Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tangerang, Banten, Indonesia.
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tangerang, Banten, Indonesia
Int Braz J Urol. 2025 Jan-Feb;51(1). doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0356.
The external ureteral catheter (EUC) and double-J stent (DJ-stent) are frequently used for drainage in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). This study aims to compare the outcomes and effectiveness of these two methods.
We conducted a detailed literature search using relevant key words on Google Scholar, Europe PMC, Medline, and Scopus databases. Continuous variables were combined using mean difference (MD), while binary variables were analysed using risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals through random-effects models.
Our analysis included nine studies. The results showed that EUC was associated with a significantly lower incidence of stent-related symptoms [RR 0.32 (95% CI 0.19 - 0.54), p < 0.0001, I² = 24%] compared to the DJ-stent. There were no significant differences between EUC and DJ-stent in terms of postoperative fever (p = 0.92), urine leakage (p = 0.21), perinephric collection (p = 0.85), haemoglobin drop (p = 0.06), transfusion rate (p = 0.27), VAS score (p = 0.67), analgesic requirements (p = 0.59), stone-free rate (p = 0.14), duration of surgery (p = 0.10), and duration of hospitalization (p = 0.50).
The EUC demonstrated fewer stent-related symptoms than the DJ-stent in tubeless PCNL, while both methods showed comparable safety and efficacy. The choice between EUC and DJ-stent should consider patient preferences and surgeon expertise. Further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with larger sample sizes are needed to affirm these results.
在无管经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)中,常使用外置输尿管导管(EUC)和双 J 支架(DJ-支架)进行引流。本研究旨在比较这两种方法的结果和效果。
我们使用 Google Scholar、Europe PMC、Medline 和 Scopus 数据库中相关的关键词进行了详细的文献检索。使用均数差(MD)合并连续变量,使用随机效应模型分析二分类变量的风险比(RR)及其 95%置信区间。
我们的分析纳入了 9 项研究。结果显示,与 DJ-支架相比,EUC 与支架相关症状的发生率显著降低[RR 0.32(95%CI 0.19-0.54),p<0.0001,I²=24%]。EUC 与 DJ-支架在术后发热(p=0.92)、尿漏(p=0.21)、肾周积液(p=0.85)、血红蛋白下降(p=0.06)、输血率(p=0.27)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分(p=0.67)、镇痛需求(p=0.59)、结石清除率(p=0.14)、手术时间(p=0.10)和住院时间(p=0.50)方面无显著差异。
在无管 PCNL 中,EUC 比 DJ-支架引起的支架相关症状更少,而这两种方法具有相似的安全性和疗效。选择 EUC 还是 DJ-支架应考虑患者的偏好和外科医生的专业知识。需要进一步开展更大样本量的随机对照试验(RCT)来证实这些结果。