Fanning Ruth M
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Anaesthesia. 2008 Apr;63(4):370-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05378.x. Epub 2008 Feb 22.
Conscious sedation is routinely performed by non-anaesthetic doctors. Although guidelines exist to help promote patient safety, it is not clear how stringently these are adhered to. We circulated a questionnaire to non-anaesthetic doctors in training to assess sedation practices. A response rate of 79% (111/140) was achieved. Results showed that 70% of respondents used data recording sheets and/or had protocols for recovery and discharge. In all, 88% of procedures were performed in the presence of an assistant; 82% of respondents used pulse oximetry; 80% used non-invasive blood pressure monitoring; 53% used ECG monitoring; and none used capnography. Of respondents, 29% were Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) certified; and 22% reported an adverse event. Two respondents experienced adverse events that required the assistance of an anaesthetist. The practice of sedation is not without risk, and doctors involved in the practice should be aware of, and adhere to, appropriate guidelines.
清醒镇静通常由非麻醉医生实施。尽管有指南来促进患者安全,但尚不清楚这些指南的遵守程度有多严格。我们向接受培训的非麻醉医生发放了一份问卷,以评估镇静操作情况。回收率为79%(111/140)。结果显示,70%的受访者使用数据记录表和/或有恢复及出院方案。总体而言,88%的操作是在有助手在场的情况下进行的;82%的受访者使用脉搏血氧饱和度仪;80%使用无创血压监测;53%使用心电图监测;无人使用二氧化碳监测。在受访者中,29%获得了高级心血管生命支持(ACLS)认证;22%报告了不良事件。两名受访者经历了需要麻醉医生协助的不良事件。镇静操作并非没有风险,参与该操作的医生应了解并遵守适当的指南。