Suppr超能文献

为激素敏感性乳腺癌绝经后女性选择早期辅助治疗:芳香化酶抑制剂与他莫昔芬的比较。

Choosing early adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer: aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen.

作者信息

Carpenter R

机构信息

St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008 Jul;34(7):746-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.01.011. Epub 2008 Mar 4.

Abstract

AIMS

The aromatase inhibitors (AIs) anastrozole, exemestane, and letrozole have demonstrated superior disease-free survival (DFS) over tamoxifen in several trials. As the choice of adjuvant endocrine treatment for early breast cancer (EBC) is evolving from tamoxifen to the AIs, this review compares the AIs with tamoxifen to help surgeons choose a treatment plan that provides the greatest reduction of recurrence risk for their patients.

METHODS

MEDLINE was searched to identify relevant literature on the adjuvant use of tamoxifen and AIs in EBC.

RESULTS

Despite the use of adjuvant tamoxifen, recurrence is a persistent threat to women with hormone-sensitive EBC. Trials of the AIs versus tamoxifen have established that patients benefit from longer DFS, and in some cases distant DFS, after the use of an AI as initial adjuvant therapy, as switch therapy following 2-3 years of tamoxifen, or as extended adjuvant therapy following 5 years of tamoxifen. The AIs are well tolerated, with a different safety profile than that of tamoxifen in all these settings. Trials addressing the optimal regimen and treatment duration for AIs are also underway.

CONCLUSIONS

The advantage in DFS associated with AIs over tamoxifen use should prompt physicians and patients to consider the use of an AI as the initial adjuvant endocrine therapy or, alternatively, switching patients who currently take tamoxifen to an AI for the remainder of adjuvant endocrine therapy. Prolonging the period of adjuvant therapy with letrozole after 5 years of tamoxifen reduces recurrence and is associated with a survival advantage in node-positive patients.

摘要

目的

在多项试验中,芳香化酶抑制剂(AIs)阿那曲唑、依西美坦和来曲唑已显示出相较于他莫昔芬具有更好的无病生存期(DFS)。由于早期乳腺癌(EBC)辅助内分泌治疗的选择正从他莫昔芬转向AIs,本综述比较了AIs与他莫昔芬,以帮助外科医生选择能最大程度降低患者复发风险的治疗方案。

方法

检索MEDLINE以识别关于他莫昔芬和AIs在EBC中辅助应用的相关文献。

结果

尽管使用了辅助性他莫昔芬,但复发仍是激素敏感性EBC女性面临的持续威胁。AIs与他莫昔芬的试验已证实,患者在将AI作为初始辅助治疗、在使用他莫昔芬2 - 3年后作为转换治疗或在使用他莫昔芬5年后作为延长辅助治疗后,可从更长的DFS中获益,在某些情况下还可从远处DFS中获益。AIs耐受性良好,在所有这些情况下其安全性与他莫昔芬不同。关于AIs最佳方案和治疗持续时间的试验也在进行中。

结论

与使用他莫昔芬相比,AIs在DFS方面的优势应促使医生和患者考虑将AI作为初始辅助内分泌治疗,或者将目前服用他莫昔芬的患者转换为AI进行剩余的辅助内分泌治疗。在使用他莫昔芬5年后用 来曲唑延长辅助治疗期可降低复发率,并在淋巴结阳性患者中具有生存优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验