Holt Brady W, Lambourne Kate
Strength and Conditioning Athletic Department, University of Evansville, Evansville, Indiana, USA.
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Jan;22(1):226-9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31815f9d6a.
The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of different types of warm-up on countermovement vertical jump (VJ) performance. Sixty-four male Division I collegiate football players completed a pretest for VJ height. The participants were then randomly assigned to a warm-up only condition, a warm-up plus static stretching condition, a warm-up plus dynamic stretching condition, or a warm-up plus dynamic flexibility condition. VJ performance was tested immediately after the completion of the warm-up. The results showed that there was a significant difference (P < .05) in VJ performance between the warm-up groups. Posttest jump performance improved in all groups; however, the mean for the static stretching group was significantly lower than the means for the other 3 groups. The static stretching negated the benefits gained from a general warm-up when performed immediately before a VJ test.
本研究的目的是比较不同类型的热身运动对反向纵跳(VJ)表现的影响。64名美国大学体育协会一级联赛的男性大学生橄榄球运动员完成了VJ高度的预测试。然后,参与者被随机分配到仅进行热身的组、热身加静态拉伸的组、热身加动态拉伸的组或热身加动态柔韧性的组。在热身结束后立即测试VJ表现。结果显示,热身组之间的VJ表现存在显著差异(P < .05)。所有组的测试后跳跃表现均有所提高;然而,静态拉伸组的平均值显著低于其他3组的平均值。在VJ测试前立即进行静态拉伸会抵消一般热身所带来的益处。