Opdam Niek J M, Bronkhorst Ewald M, Roeters Joost M, Loomans Bas A C
Department of Preventive and Curative Dentistry, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Adhes Dent. 2007 Oct;9(5):469-75.
To investigate longevity and reasons for failure of Class II posterior composite restorations (PCRs) placed with or without a lining of glass-ionomer cement.
Four hundred fifty-eight Class II PCR placed in 248 patients (110 male, 138 female, age 18 to 80) by two dentists in a general practice between 1988 and 1997 were retrospectively examined from the patient files. The restorations were placed either with a total-etch technique or with a resin-modified glass-ionomer lining placed on the dentin. Items recorded were date of placement, date of last check-up visit, tooth number, and restored surfaces. Date of replacement and reason for failure of the PCR was recorded. A restoration was clinically acceptable when still in function and acceptable at the last check-up visit. Additionally, the caries risk for each patient was estimated by the treating clinician. Life tables and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to express survival rates. A Cox regression was applied to assess the influence of variables on survival.
Three hundred seventy-six total-etch PCRs and 82 PCRs with a lining were investigated. After 9 years, survival percentages of 88.1% for total-etch restorations and 70.5% for restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer lining were found. The most important reasons for failure were fracture and caries. Predominantly, failures started occurring after 3 to 4 years of clinical service. Results of the Cox regression show that the presence of a lining and high risk for caries significantly increased the failure rate of the restorations.
PCRs placed with a resin-modified glass-ionomer lining clinically showed more frequent fractures than PCRs placed with a total-etch technique.
研究在有或没有玻璃离子粘固剂衬层的情况下放置的Ⅱ类后牙复合树脂修复体(PCR)的存留时间及失败原因。
回顾性检查了1988年至1997年间两位全科牙医为248例患者(110名男性,138名女性,年龄18至80岁)放置的458个Ⅱ类PCR。修复体采用全酸蚀技术或在牙本质上放置树脂改性玻璃离子衬层进行放置。记录的项目包括放置日期、最后一次复诊日期、牙位和修复面。记录PCR的更换日期和失败原因。当修复体仍在使用且在最后一次复诊时可接受时,临床上认为该修复体是可接受的。此外,治疗医生对每位患者的龋病风险进行了评估。使用生命表和Kaplan-Meier曲线来表示生存率。应用Cox回归来评估变量对生存的影响。
研究了376个全酸蚀PCR和82个有衬层的PCR。9年后,全酸蚀修复体的存留率为88.1%,有树脂改性玻璃离子衬层的修复体的存留率为70.5%。失败的最重要原因是折断和龋病。主要是在临床使用3至4年后开始出现失败。Cox回归结果表明,有衬层和高龋病风险显著增加了修复体的失败率。
与采用全酸蚀技术放置的PCR相比,采用树脂改性玻璃离子衬层放置的PCR在临床上显示出更频繁的折断。