• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量糖尿病患者的功能性、沟通性和批判性健康素养。

Measuring functional, communicative, and critical health literacy among diabetic patients.

作者信息

Ishikawa Hirono, Takeuchi Takeaki, Yano Eiji

机构信息

Department of Hygiene and Public Health, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2008 May;31(5):874-9. doi: 10.2337/dc07-1932. Epub 2008 Feb 25.

DOI:10.2337/dc07-1932
PMID:18299446
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Health literacy (HL), the capacity of individuals to access, understand, and use health information to make informed and appropriate health-related decisions, has been recognized as an important concept in patient education and disease management. This study examined the psychometric properties of newly developed scales for measuring three different levels of HL (i.e., functional, communicative, and critical) in patients with diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The reliability and validity of the three HL scales were evaluated in a sample of 138 outpatients with type 2 diabetes. In addition, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, knowledge of diabetes, information-seeking behaviors, and self-efficacy were assessed for each patient through a self-report questionnaire and review of electronic medical records.

RESULTS

Scale items were constructed to directly reflect the definition of HL. Internal consistency of functional, communicative, and critical HL scales was adequately high (alpha = 0.84, alpha = 0.77, and alpha = 0.65, respectively). Three interpretable factors were identified in exploratory factor analysis. Correlations between HL scales and other measures supported the construct validity of the scales. The three HL scales were only moderately correlated with each other, suggesting that each represents a different domain of HL abilities and skills.

CONCLUSIONS

Our newly developed HL scales are reliable and valid measures of three types of HL in diabetic patients. Exploring a patient's HL levels may provide a better understanding of the patient's potential barriers to self-management of disease and health-promoting behaviors.

摘要

目的

健康素养(HL)是指个人获取、理解和使用健康信息以做出明智且恰当的健康相关决策的能力,已被公认为患者教育和疾病管理中的一个重要概念。本研究检验了新开发的用于测量糖尿病患者三种不同水平健康素养(即功能型、沟通型和批判性)量表的心理测量特性。

研究设计与方法

在138例2型糖尿病门诊患者样本中评估了这三种健康素养量表的信度和效度。此外,通过自我报告问卷和电子病历回顾,对每位患者的社会人口统计学和临床特征、糖尿病知识、信息寻求行为及自我效能进行了评估。

结果

量表项目的构建直接反映了健康素养的定义。功能型、沟通型和批判性健康素养量表的内部一致性足够高(分别为α = 0.84、α = 0.77和α = 0.65)。探索性因子分析确定了三个可解释的因子。健康素养量表与其他测量指标之间的相关性支持了量表的结构效度。这三个健康素养量表彼此之间仅呈中度相关,表明每个量表代表了健康素养能力和技能的不同领域。

结论

我们新开发的健康素养量表是糖尿病患者三种类型健康素养的可靠且有效的测量工具。探索患者的健康素养水平可能有助于更好地理解患者在疾病自我管理和健康促进行为方面的潜在障碍。

相似文献

1
Measuring functional, communicative, and critical health literacy among diabetic patients.测量糖尿病患者的功能性、沟通性和批判性健康素养。
Diabetes Care. 2008 May;31(5):874-9. doi: 10.2337/dc07-1932. Epub 2008 Feb 25.
2
Patient health literacy and patient-physician information exchange during a visit.患者健康素养与就诊期间医患信息交流。
Fam Pract. 2009 Dec;26(6):517-23. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmp060. Epub 2009 Oct 7.
3
Development and Validation of a Heart Failure-Specific Health Literacy Scale.心力衰竭特异性健康素养量表的开发与验证
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016 Mar-Apr;31(2):131-9. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000226.
4
Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of Health Belief Model Scale in diabetic patients.糖尿病患者中健康信念模型量表土耳其语版本的效度和信度研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Nov;44(8):1447-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.06.004. Epub 2007 Jul 25.
5
Communicative and critical health literacy, and self-management behaviors in end-stage renal disease patients with diabetes on hemodialysis.沟通和批判式健康素养,以及血液透析终末期肾病伴糖尿病患者的自我管理行为。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 May;91(2):221-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.12.018. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
6
Patient Interpretation of Neuropathy (PIN) questionnaire: an instrument for assessment of cognitive and emotional factors associated with foot self-care.患者对神经病变的理解(PIN)问卷:一种用于评估与足部自我护理相关的认知和情感因素的工具。
Diabetes Care. 2006 Dec;29(12):2617-24. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1550.
7
Validation of the Dutch functional, communicative and critical health literacy scales.荷兰功能性、交际性和批判性健康素养量表的验证。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Oct;89(1):82-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.07.014. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
8
Patients' perspectives of the doctor-patient relationship and information giving across a range of literacy levels.不同文化程度患者对医患关系及信息提供的看法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Apr;75(1):114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.09.026. Epub 2008 Nov 28.
9
Development and validation of the Communication and Attitudinal Self-Efficacy scale for cancer (CASE-cancer).癌症沟通与态度自我效能量表(CASE-癌症)的开发与验证
Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Jun;57(3):333-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.09.005.
10
Development and evaluation of an oral health literacy instrument for adults.成人口腔健康素养工具的开发与评估
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;37(5):451-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2009.00490.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Trust in physicians as a mediator of the relationship between person-centered care and medication adherence in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a cross-sectional study.信任医生作为接受血液透析患者以患者为中心的护理与药物依从性之间关系的调解因素:一项横断面研究。
J Nephrol. 2025 Aug 19. doi: 10.1007/s40620-025-02387-2.
2
Validation of the Swedish version of HLS19-Q12: a measurement for general health literacy.瑞典版HLS19-Q12的验证:一种衡量一般健康素养的方法。
Health Promot Int. 2025 Jul 1;40(4). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf132.
3
Development of a cannabis health literacy questionnaire: preliminary validation using the Rasch model.
大麻健康素养问卷的编制:基于拉施模型的初步验证
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 24;25(1):2539. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23770-5.
4
Factors associated with parental literacy and hesitancy toward pediatric vaccination.与父母文化程度及对儿童疫苗接种的犹豫态度相关的因素。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2201. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23410-y.
5
Longitudinal association of family support, health literacy, and self-management behavior in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: an analysis based on cross-lag model.新诊断2型糖尿病患者家庭支持、健康素养与自我管理行为的纵向关联:基于交叉滞后模型的分析
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2025 Jun 9;24(2):145. doi: 10.1007/s40200-025-01651-3. eCollection 2025 Dec.
6
Factors influencing health-related quality of life among people with uncontrolled type II diabetes mellitus in Wenzhou, China: A cross-sectional study.中国温州未控制的2型糖尿病患者健康相关生活质量的影响因素:一项横断面研究。
Belitung Nurs J. 2025 May 27;11(3):321-329. doi: 10.33546/bnj.3785. eCollection 2025.
7
Conceptualisation of critical health literacy-insights from Western and East Asian perspectives: a scoping review.从西方和东亚视角看关键健康素养的概念化:一项范围综述
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 May 15;10(5):e018232. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018232.
8
Assessing Health Literacy Among Hospitalized Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study in Silesia, Poland.评估住院患者的健康素养:波兰西里西亚的一项横断面研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 8;13(6):593. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13060593.
9
Obstacles for self-management practices among diabetes patients: A facility-based study from Coastal South India.糖尿病患者自我管理实践的障碍:一项来自印度南部沿海地区的基于机构的研究。
F1000Res. 2023 Jul 17;12:839. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.138146.1. eCollection 2023.
10
Association of medication adherence with treatment preferences: incentivizing truthful self-reporting.药物依从性与治疗偏好的关联:激励真实的自我报告。
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Feb 22. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01760-z.