Suppr超能文献

套袖式手臂与裸臂血压测量的比较。

A comparison of blood pressure measurement over a sleeved arm versus a bare arm.

作者信息

Ma Grace, Sabin Norman, Dawes Martin

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Que.

出版信息

CMAJ. 2008 Feb 26;178(5):585-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.070975.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The measurement of blood pressure is a common clinical exam with important health consequences. We sought to determine whether the measurement of blood pressure over a sleeved arm varies from that taken on a bare arm.

METHODS

We recruited 376 patients between 18 and 85 years of age from a family medicine clinic between September 2004 and November 2006. They all had their blood pressure recorded using the same automatic oscillometric device, with the cuff placed over their bare arms for the first reading. Each patient was then randomly assigned to either the bare-arm group, for which the second blood pressure reading was also taken on a bare arm, or the sleeved-arm group, for which the second reading was taken with the cuff placed over the patient's sleeve.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 376 participants was 61.6 years (standard deviation 15.0), 61% of the participants were male, 41% had hypertension and 11.7% had diabetes. We found no clinically important differences between the bare-arm group (n = 180) and the sleeved-arm group (n = 196) in age, sex or body mass index. The mean differences between the first and second readings for patients in the bare-arm group were 4.1 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8 to 5.5) for systolic blood pressure and 0.1 mm Hg (95% CI -0.7 to 0.9) for diastolic blood pressure. The mean differences between the first and second readings for patients in the sleeved-arm group were 3.4 mm Hg (95% CI 2.1 to 4.7) for systolic blood pressure and 0.4 mm Hg (95% CI -0.4 to 1.3) for diastolic blood pressure. The between-group differences in these values was 0.76 mm Hg (95% CI -1.13 to 2.65) for systolic and -0.31 mm Hg (95% CI -1.48 to 0.86) for diastolic blood pressure; neither of these differences was clinically important or statistically significant.

INTERPRETATION

We found that there was no significant difference in blood pressure recorded over a sleeve or on a bare arm. For practical purposes, the decision to measure blood pressure on a bare arm or over a sleeved arm should be left to the judgment of the health care professional taking the blood pressure.

摘要

背景

血压测量是一项常见的临床检查,对健康有重要影响。我们试图确定通过带袖手臂测量的血压与在裸臂上测量的血压是否存在差异。

方法

2004年9月至2006年11月期间,我们从一家家庭医学诊所招募了376名年龄在18至85岁之间的患者。他们均使用同一台自动示波装置记录血压,首次测量时将袖带置于裸臂上。然后,将每位患者随机分配至裸臂组(该组第二次血压测量也在裸臂上进行)或带袖臂组(该组第二次测量时将袖带置于患者衣袖上)。

结果

376名参与者的平均年龄为61.6岁(标准差15.0),61%为男性,41%患有高血压,11.7%患有糖尿病。我们发现,裸臂组(n = 180)和带袖臂组(n = 196)在年龄、性别或体重指数方面无临床重要差异。裸臂组患者首次和第二次测量值之间的收缩压平均差异为4.1毫米汞柱(95%置信区间[CI] 2.8至5.5),舒张压平均差异为0.1毫米汞柱(95% CI -0.7至0.9)。带袖臂组患者首次和第二次测量值之间的收缩压平均差异为3.4毫米汞柱(95% CI 2.1至4.7),舒张压平均差异为0.4毫米汞柱(95% CI -0.4至1.3)。这些值在组间的差异为收缩压0.76毫米汞柱(95% CI -1.13至2.65),舒张压-0.31毫米汞柱(95% CI -1.48至0.86);这些差异均无临床重要性或统计学显著性。

解读

我们发现,通过衣袖或裸臂记录的血压无显著差异。出于实际目的,在裸臂或带袖手臂上测量血压的决定应留由测量血压的医护专业人员判断。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验