Suppr超能文献

一项随机单病例研究,比较在穿着衣服的手臂上和卷起袖子的手臂上测量的血压。

A randomized n-of-1 study comparing blood pressure measured on a clothed arm and on an arm with a rolled-up sleeve.

作者信息

Lins Robert L

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Antwerpen, Antwerpen, Belgium.

出版信息

Acta Clin Belg. 2023 Oct;78(5):401-405. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2023.2205676. Epub 2023 May 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Blood pressure [BP] should be measured using a bare upper arm with an appropriately sized cuff. In practice, it is more convenient to measure BP on a bare arm below a rolled-up sleeve or on a sleeved arm.

AIM

A n-of-1 randomized controlled trial was performed to assess the difference between BP measurements over a sleeve or below a rolled-up sleeve.

METHODS

The study subject was male, white, 72 years old, BMI 26 kg/m2, arm circumference 29 cm, and under stable antihypertensive treatment. The mean of three BP measurements over a thin sleeve was compared with measurements below a rolled-up sleeve. Additional measurements on a completely bare arm, with thicker sleeves and up to three layers were performed. The order of measurements was determined by chance and two oscillometric devices were used. Descriptive statistics, Bland-Altman test and 2-side T test were used for comparisons.

RESULTS

504 measurements were performed: 50 % over the sleeve and 50 % below the rolled-up sleeve. The mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) was respectively 116.9 ± 9. 2 [95% CI 115.7-118.0, range 96-135] and 122.8 ± 9.2 [95% CI 121.7-124.0, range 103-139,  = 0.001] mm Hg. The mean diastolic blood pressure [DBP] was respectively 67.6 ± 6.8 [95% CI 66.8-68.4, range 52-84] and 71.8 ± 6.8 [95% CI 71.0-72.7, range 55-85,  = 0.001] mm Hg. There was no significant difference between the measurements over the sleeve and on the completely bare arm [ = 94,  = 0.97]. Sleeve thickness with 2 layers up to 3 mm thick did not affect the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Blood pressure measurements over a thin sleeve were significantly lower than measurements below a rolled-up sleeve and match measurements on a completely bare arm.

摘要

背景

应使用尺寸合适的袖带在裸露的上臂测量血压。在实际操作中,在卷起袖子下方的裸露手臂上或穿着袖子的手臂上测量血压更为方便。

目的

进行一项n-of-1随机对照试验,以评估在袖子上测量血压与在卷起袖子下方测量血压之间的差异。

方法

研究对象为72岁的白人男性,体重指数(BMI)为26kg/m²,臂围29cm,正在接受稳定的降压治疗。将在薄袖子上进行的三次血压测量的平均值与在卷起袖子下方进行的测量值进行比较。还在完全裸露的手臂上、使用更厚的袖子以及多达三层袖子的情况下进行了额外测量。测量顺序由随机确定,并使用了两台示波装置。采用描述性统计、布兰德-奥特曼检验和双侧t检验进行比较。

结果

共进行了504次测量:50%在袖子上进行,50%在卷起袖子下方进行。平均收缩压(SBP)分别为116.9±9.2[95%可信区间115.7-118.0,范围96-135]和122.8±9.2[95%可信区间121.7-124.0,范围103-139,P = 0.001]mmHg。平均舒张压(DBP)分别为67.6±6.8[95%可信区间66.8-68.4,范围52-84]和71.8±6.8[95%可信区间71.0-72.7,范围55-85,P = 0.001]mmHg。在袖子上测量与在完全裸露的手臂上测量之间无显著差异(P = 0.94,P =0.97)。厚度达3mm的两层袖子不影响测量结果。

结论

在薄袖子上测量的血压显著低于在卷起袖子下方测量的血压,且与在完全裸露的手臂上测量的结果相符。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验