Temporal analysis of cellular cytotoxicity and humoral factors during progession and regression of Rous sarcomas in Japanese quails.

Temporal appearance of cellular cytotoxicity and humoral activities including blocking and arming activities during the entire course of Rous sarcoma development in Japanese quails was examined by microcytotoxicity assay with comparison of animals bearing regressing tumors induced by a moderate dose of virus (regressors) and animals bearing growing tumors induced by a large dose of virus (progressors). Cellular cytotoxicity of the spleen cells in regressors was detected in a biphasic pattern; the first phase being observed as early as 3-5 days post inoculation (p.i.), followed by an eclipse period between 7-10 days p.i. which was the time of active tumor growth, and the second phase occurring after 12 days p.i. when the tumor had attained the maximum size. In progressors, only the first phase was observed. Instead, a stimulatory effect of the spleen cells on growth of target cells was noticed. Arming activity which confers cytotoxic activity on the normal spleen cells was demonstrated in the sera of regressors in the similar biphasic pattern as the cellular cytotoxicity; the early activity being present at 3 days p.i., and the late one after 19 days p.i. The former was detected by pre-incubation of serum with effector cells in microcytotoxicity assay and the latter by pre-incubation with target cells. In progressors, only the early arming activity which reacts with effector cells was demonstrated. Blocking activity which abrogates cellular cytotoxicity was demonstrated in both regressors and progressors but in different patterns of appearance, that is, blocking activity in regressors was only transiently demonstrated only by pre-incubation with effector cells at the time of maximum tumor growth, while the activity in progressors seemed to persist after the tumor reached the maximum size. Since the earlier activity was found to be effective at effector cell level, and the later one at both effector and target cell levels, participation of blocking factors of different types in progressors was also suggested.