de Almeida Glauce Regina Costa, de Souza Guerra Carolina, Tanus-Santos José Eduardo, Barbosa Fernando, Gerlach Raquel Fernanda
Department of Morphology, Stomatology and Physiology, Dental School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo-FORP/USP, Av. do Café, S/N, Monte Alegre, CEP 14040-904, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Environ Res. 2008 Jun;107(2):264-70. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2008.01.002. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
In a previous study, we showed 4 times more lead in surface deciduous enamel (1.9-5.9 microm) of a notoriously contaminated area (Bauru, São Paulo State, Brazil) in comparison to samples from a region with no lead contamination described (Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo State, Brazil). The samples from the more superficial enamel (1.9-3.18 microm) showed higher amounts of lead and the highest variability, while in the subsurface enamel (3.18-5.9 microm) a plateau in lead content was detected in children living in the contaminated environment (around 600 microg/g). Here we expand our previous study, and use only samples obtained from subsurface enamel (Ribeirão Preto, n=186; Bauru, n=20). We tried to distinguish regions with more children with lead above the threshold of 600 microg/g of lead in enamel. We tested whether differences in the percentage of children with ''high" lead (600 microg/g) could be observed among the different Kindergartens studied in Ribeirão Preto. We also tested whether these results were different from the ones provided by conventional comparison of the data. Ribeirão Preto showed almost 4 times less lead than Bauru (p<0.0001), and a statistically significant difference was found only in Ribeirão Preto between Kindergarten 2 and 5 (p<0.01). Twelve percent of the children from Ribeirão Preto had "high" lead, while 55% of the children from Bauru did so. However, when we looked at the percentages of children with "high" lead in each Kindergarten, and compared them, a whole new picture emerged, in which we could see children with "high" lead concentrated mainly in 3 Kindergartens from Ribeirão Preto, with Kindergarten 5 with 33% of the children with "high" lead, being statistically different from all Kindergartens, except 4 and 6. The threshold of 600 microg/g of lead in subsurface enamel was tentatively settled here after the plateau seen in exposed children, and enabled us to identify locations with more children exposed to a higher amount of lead.
在之前的一项研究中,我们发现,与来自无铅污染地区(巴西圣保罗州里贝朗普雷图)的样本相比,在一个污染严重的地区(巴西圣保罗州鲍鲁),乳牙表层釉质(1.9 - 5.9微米)中的铅含量高出4倍。来自较表层釉质(1.9 - 3.18微米)的样本显示出更高的铅含量和最大的变异性,而在污染环境中生活的儿童的乳牙次表层釉质(3.18 - 5.9微米)中,铅含量达到了一个稳定水平(约600微克/克)。在此,我们扩展了之前的研究,仅使用从乳牙次表层釉质获取的样本(里贝朗普雷图,n = 186;鲍鲁,n = 20)。我们试图区分出釉质中铅含量高于600微克/克阈值的儿童较多的区域。我们测试了在里贝朗普雷图研究的不同幼儿园中,能否观察到“高”铅(600微克/克)儿童百分比的差异。我们还测试了这些结果是否与传统数据比较得出的结果不同。里贝朗普雷图的铅含量几乎比鲍鲁少4倍(p < 0.0001),并且仅在里贝朗普雷图的幼儿园2和幼儿园5之间发现了统计学上的显著差异(p < 0.01)。里贝朗普雷图12%的儿童有“高”铅水平,而鲍鲁55%的儿童有“高”铅水平。然而,当我们查看每个幼儿园中“高”铅儿童的百分比并进行比较时,出现了全新的情况,我们可以看到里贝朗普雷图有“高”铅水平的儿童主要集中在3所幼儿园,其中幼儿园5有33%的儿童有“高”铅水平,与除幼儿园4和幼儿园6之外的所有幼儿园相比有统计学差异。在观察到暴露儿童的铅含量稳定水平后,在此暂定乳牙次表层釉质中铅含量600微克/克的阈值,这使我们能够识别出有更多儿童暴露于更高铅含量的地点。