Tamburrini Gianpiero, Dal Fabbro Mateus, Di Rocco Concezio
Pediatric Neurosurgery Unit, Institute of Neurosurgery, Catholic University Medical School, Largo "A. Gemelli", 8, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Childs Nerv Syst. 2008 May;24(5):593-604. doi: 10.1007/s00381-008-0585-9. Epub 2008 Feb 28.
The management of Sylvian arachnoid cysts in children is still a matter of debate. Diagnosis is often incidental, and symptoms are frequently aspecific in symptomatic cases. Suggested diagnostic investigation results have been often unclear. Surgical treatment is also controversial, pure, and assisted endoscopic cyst marsupialization having entered in the traditional debate between craniotomic and shunting approach
The objective of the present study was to survey if (and, eventually, which) agreement points do actually exist between internationally recognized pediatric neurosurgery centers in the management of children with a controversial type of Sylvian arachnoid cyst (Type II cyst).
Contributors were asked to answer to a six-separate-part multiple choice questionnaire related to the case of a 2.7-year-old boy with a Type II left Sylvian arachnoid cyst presented in different clinical situations. If surgery was indicated, it was asked which surgical procedure the authors would have suggested as first option.
The option of the mere clinical observation was chosen by the majority of surgeons in case of asymptomatic clinical discovery. On the other hand, a constantly high percentage of participants suggested direct surgical treatment based on clinical manifestations or as a preventive measure justified by the risk of spontaneous or traumatic intracranial bleeding. The only diagnostic investigation result which significantly influenced the surgical indication was a localizing electroencephalography, if the child presented with seizures. The result is that in most cases the surgical indication was based on aspecific clinical manifestations and laboratory data. Craniotomy and arachnoid cyst marsupialization represented the preferred surgical option (66.6%), 28.8% of the participants suggesting pure or assisted endoscopic cyst marsupialization as primary surgical procedure. Cyst shunting was suggested by only three centers.
儿童大脑外侧裂蛛网膜囊肿的治疗仍存在争议。诊断常常是偶然发现,有症状的病例中症状也往往缺乏特异性。建议的诊断性检查结果常常不明确。手术治疗也存在争议,单纯及辅助性内镜下囊肿造袋术已进入开颅手术和分流手术传统争论之中。
本研究的目的是调查国际公认的小儿神经外科中心在处理有争议类型的大脑外侧裂蛛网膜囊肿(II型囊肿)患儿时是否(以及最终哪些)存在共识点。
要求参与者回答一份分为六个部分的多项选择题问卷,该问卷涉及一名2.7岁患有左侧II型大脑外侧裂蛛网膜囊肿男孩在不同临床情况下的病例。如果建议进行手术,则询问作者会建议将哪种手术作为首选。
大多数外科医生在无症状临床发现的情况下选择单纯临床观察。另一方面,相当高比例的参与者建议根据临床表现或作为自发性或外伤性颅内出血风险所证明的预防措施进行直接手术治疗。唯一显著影响手术指征的诊断性检查结果是,如果患儿出现癫痫发作,则是定位脑电图。结果是,在大多数情况下,手术指征基于非特异性临床表现和实验室数据。开颅手术和蛛网膜囊肿造袋术是首选的手术方式(66.6%),28.8%的参与者建议将单纯或辅助性内镜下囊肿造袋术作为主要手术方式。只有三个中心建议进行囊肿分流术。