• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放性与微创腰椎间盘切除术:手术时间、住院时间、麻醉药物使用及并发症的比较

Open versus minimally invasive lumbar microdiscectomy: comparison of operative times, length of hospital stay, narcotic use and complications.

作者信息

Harrington J F, French P

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island 02905, USA.

出版信息

Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2008 Feb;51(1):30-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1004543.

DOI:10.1055/s-2007-1004543
PMID:18306129
Abstract

To determine if a minimally invasive approach to lumbar microdiscectomy reduces post-operative pain, length of hospital stay, or frequency of complications we retrospectively compared medical records of single level microdiscectomy patients by a single surgeon performed using a traditional open approach versus a minimally invasive approach. Thirty-five patients were in the open group: 63% male, average age 41.2 years, and 31 patients were in the minimally invasive group: 68% male, average age 42.1 years. There was no difference in surgical time or blood loss between the open and minimally invasive groups: 84.1 versus 76.8 minutes and 51.4 versus 69.7 mL, respectively. There were no significant complications intraoperatively or within the 30 day post-op period for either group. The average dose of intravenous morphine taken was 12.9 mg for the minimally invasive group and 15.7 mg for the open group (P=0.04). The average dose of hydrocodone was 13.4 mg for the minimally invasive group and 20.9 mg for the open group (P=0.03). The open group took an average of 11.7 mg oxycodone, the minimally invasive none. 45.2% of patients in the minimally invasive group were discharged on the same day as surgery compared to 5.75% in the open group (P=0.001). Microdiscectomy was performed safely and effectively through a minimally invasive expanding retractor system and operating microscope. Surgical times, blood loss, complications, and outcome were similar to a traditional open microdiscectomy while pain medication requirements and hospitalization were significantly less.

摘要

为了确定腰椎间盘显微切除术的微创方法是否能减轻术后疼痛、缩短住院时间或降低并发症发生率,我们回顾性比较了由同一位外科医生采用传统开放手术方法与微创方法进行的单节段椎间盘显微切除术患者的病历。开放组有35例患者:男性占63%,平均年龄41.2岁;微创组有31例患者:男性占68%,平均年龄42.1岁。开放组和微创组之间的手术时间和失血量没有差异:分别为84.1分钟对76.8分钟和51.4毫升对69.7毫升。两组在术中及术后30天内均无显著并发症。微创组静脉注射吗啡的平均剂量为12.9毫克,开放组为15.7毫克(P = 0.04)。微创组氢可酮的平均剂量为13.4毫克,开放组为20.9毫克(P = 0.03)。开放组平均服用11.7毫克羟考酮,微创组未服用。微创组45.2%的患者在手术当天出院,而开放组为5.75%(P = 0.001)。通过微创扩张牵开器系统和手术显微镜安全有效地进行了椎间盘显微切除术。手术时间、失血量、并发症和结果与传统开放椎间盘显微切除术相似,但止痛药物需求和住院时间明显减少。

相似文献

1
Open versus minimally invasive lumbar microdiscectomy: comparison of operative times, length of hospital stay, narcotic use and complications.开放性与微创腰椎间盘切除术:手术时间、住院时间、麻醉药物使用及并发症的比较
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2008 Feb;51(1):30-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1004543.
2
Minimally invasive compared to open microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation.与开放性微椎间盘切除术相比,微创治疗腰椎间盘突出症。
J Clin Neurosci. 2011 Jan;18(1):81-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.04.040. Epub 2010 Sep 20.
3
Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the "classic" open approach.减压性腰椎椎板切除术技术比较:微创与“经典”开放手术入路
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2008 Apr;51(2):100-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1022542.
4
Prospective evaluation of a 3-blade speculum cannula for minimally invasive lumbar microdiscectomy.用于微创腰椎间盘切除术的三叶片窥器套管的前瞻性评估。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006 Jun;19(4):257-61. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000203272.12875.e4.
5
Laparoscopic L5-S1 diskectomy: a cost-effective, minimally invasive general surgery--neurosurgery team alternative to laminectomy.腹腔镜L5-S1椎间盘切除术:一种具有成本效益的微创普通外科 - 神经外科团队替代椎板切除术的方法。
Am Surg. 1996 Jan;62(1):64-8.
6
[Therapeutic effect of microsurgery lumbar discectomy on single-level lumbar disc protrusion].显微外科腰椎间盘切除术治疗单节段腰椎间盘突出症的疗效
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Aug;23(8):909-12.
7
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases.经皮椎间孔入路腰椎间融合术治疗退变性腰椎疾病。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Aug 1;35(17):1615-20. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c70fe3.
8
Tubular microsurgery for lumbar discectomies and laminectomies in obese patients: operative results and outcome.管状显微镜手术治疗肥胖患者的腰椎间盘切除术和椎板切除术:手术结果和预后。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 15;34(18):E664-72. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b0b63d.
9
Laparoscopic lumbar diskectomy: preliminary report of a minimally invasive anterior approach to the herniated L5-S1 disk.腹腔镜腰椎间盘切除术:L5 - S1椎间盘突出症微创前路手术的初步报告
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1995 Oct;5(5):363-9.
10
Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.单节段和双节段腰椎全椎间盘置换术与腰椎环形融合术的费用比较分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Dec 1;32(25):2905-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815b84ae.

引用本文的文献

1
Open laminectomy vs. minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a review.开放性椎板切除术与微创椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的综述
Front Surg. 2024 Nov 7;11:1357897. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1357897. eCollection 2024.
2
The Effects of Opioid Dependency Use on Postoperative Spinal Surgery Outcomes: A Review of the Available Literature.阿片类药物依赖使用对脊柱手术后结果的影响:现有文献综述
Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Jul 4;13(4):e136563. doi: 10.5812/aapm-136563. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Microendoscopic Surgery for Degenerative Disorders of the Cervical and Lumbar Spine: The Influence of the Tubular Workspace on Instrument Angulation, Clinical Outcome, Complications, and Reoperation Rates.
用于颈椎和腰椎退行性疾病的显微内镜手术:管状工作空间对器械角度、临床疗效、并发症及再次手术率的影响
J Pers Med. 2023 May 30;13(6):912. doi: 10.3390/jpm13060912.
4
Association Between Early Surgery and Postoperative Opioid Use in Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis Using an Administrative Claims Database in Japan.腰椎间盘突出症患者早期手术与术后阿片类药物使用之间的关联:一项使用日本行政索赔数据库的倾向评分匹配分析
Global Spine J. 2024 Jul;14(6):1738-1744. doi: 10.1177/21925682231154854. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
5
Minimally Invasive Spinal Treatment (MIST)-A New Concept in the Treatment of Spinal Diseases: A Narrative Review.微创脊柱治疗(MIST)——脊柱疾病治疗新概念:叙述性综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Aug 18;58(8):1123. doi: 10.3390/medicina58081123.
6
Preoperative Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection Increases the Risk of a Dural Tear During Minimally Invasive Lumbar Discectomy.术前腰椎硬膜外类固醇注射增加了微创腰椎间盘切除术中硬脊膜撕裂的风险。
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Jun;16(3):505-511. doi: 10.14444/8249.
7
Adolescent Lumbar Disc Herniation with a Peculiar Gait Pattern Managed by Transforaminal Endoscopic Spine Surgery.经椎间孔内镜脊柱手术治疗伴有特殊步态模式的青少年腰椎间盘突出症
J Orthop Case Rep. 2020 Nov;10(8):93-96. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2020.v10.i08.1876.
8
Chronic Opioid Use Following Lumbar Discectomy: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Current Trends in the United States.腰椎间盘切除术后慢性阿片类药物使用情况:美国的患病率、危险因素及当前趋势
Neurospine. 2020 Dec;17(4):879-887. doi: 10.14245/ns.2040122.061. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
9
Comparison between Results of Microdiscectomy and Open Discectomy in Management of High-Level Lumbar Disc Prolapse.显微椎间盘切除术与开放椎间盘切除术治疗高位腰椎间盘突出症的疗效比较
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Aug 30;7(17):2851-2857. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.679. eCollection 2019 Sep 15.
10
Trends in outpatient minimally invasive spine surgery.门诊微创脊柱手术的发展趋势。
J Spine Surg. 2019 Jun;5(Suppl 1):S108-S114. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.04.17.