Suppr超能文献

一项比较门诊普通外科手术后对乙酰氨基酚加布洛芬与对乙酰氨基酚加可待因加咖啡因疗效的随机对照试验。

A randomized controlled trial comparing acetaminophen plus ibuprofen versus acetaminophen plus codeine plus caffeine after outpatient general surgery.

作者信息

Mitchell Alex, van Zanten Sander Veldhuyzen, Inglis Karen, Porter Geoffrey

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University and QEII Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Mar;206(3):472-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.09.006. Epub 2007 Nov 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Narcotics are used extensively in outpatient general surgery but are often poorly tolerated with variable efficacy. Acetaminophen combined with NSAIDs is a possible alternative. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of acetaminophen, codeine, and caffeine (Tylenol No. 3) with acetaminophen and ibuprofen for management of pain after outpatient general surgery procedures.

STUDY DESIGN

A double-blind randomized controlled trial was performed in patients undergoing outpatient inguinal/umbilical/ventral hernia repair or laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were randomized to receive acetaminophen plus codeine plus caffeine (Tylenol No. 3) or acetaminophen plus ibuprofen (AcIBU) 4 times daily for 7 days or until pain-free. Pain intensity, measured four times daily by visual analogue scale, was the primary outcome. Secondary end points included incidence of side effects, patient satisfaction, number of days until patient was pain-free, and use of alternative analgesia.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-six patients were randomized (74 Tylenol No. 3 and 72 AcIBU), and 139 (95%) patients completed the study. No significant differences in mean or maximum daily visual analogue scale scores were identified between the 2 groups, except on postoperative day 2, when pain was improved in AcIBU patients (p = 0.025). During the entire week, mean visual analogue scale score was modestly lower in AcIBU patients (p = 0.018). More patients in the AcIBU group, compared with Tylenol No. 3, were satisfied with their analgesia (83% versus 64%, respectively; p = 0.02). There were more side effects with Tylenol No. 3 (57% versus 41%, p = 0.045), and the discontinuation rate was also higher in Tylenol No. 3-treated patients (11% versus 3%, p = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

When compared with Tylenol No. 3, AcIBU was not an inferior analgesic and was associated with fewer side effects and higher patient satisfaction. AcIBU is an effective, low-cost, and safe alternative to codeine-based narcotic analgesia for outpatient general surgery procedures.

摘要

背景

麻醉药在门诊普通外科手术中广泛使用,但耐受性往往较差,疗效也不尽相同。对乙酰氨基酚联合非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)可能是一种替代选择。本研究的目的是比较对乙酰氨基酚、可待因和咖啡因(泰诺3号)与对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬在门诊普通外科手术后疼痛管理中的疗效。

研究设计

对接受门诊腹股沟/脐/腹疝修补术或腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者进行了一项双盲随机对照试验。患者被随机分为两组,分别接受对乙酰氨基酚加可待因加咖啡因(泰诺3号)或对乙酰氨基酚加布洛芬(AcIBU),每日4次,共7天,或直至无痛。通过视觉模拟量表每天测量4次疼痛强度,这是主要结局指标。次要终点包括副作用发生率、患者满意度、患者无痛天数以及使用替代镇痛药物的情况。

结果

146例患者被随机分组(74例接受泰诺3号,72例接受AcIBU),139例(95%)患者完成了研究。两组之间在每日平均或最大视觉模拟量表评分上无显著差异,但在术后第2天,AcIBU组患者的疼痛有所改善(p = 0.025)。在整周内,AcIBU组患者的平均视觉模拟量表评分略低(p = 0.018)。与泰诺3号组相比,AcIBU组对镇痛效果满意的患者更多(分别为83%和64%;p = 0.02)。泰诺3号的副作用更多(57%对41%,p = 0.045),泰诺3号治疗的患者停药率也更高(11%对3%,p = 0.044)。

结论

与泰诺3号相比,AcIBU并非疗效较差的镇痛药,且副作用更少,患者满意度更高。对于门诊普通外科手术,AcIBU是基于可待因的麻醉性镇痛的一种有效、低成本且安全的替代药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验