Suppr超能文献

成人门诊患者术后疼痛管理:比较可待因与 NSAIDs 的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Managing postoperative pain in adult outpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing codeine with NSAIDs.

机构信息

Departments of Surgery (Choi, Coroneos, Voineskos) and Anesthesia (Wang, Paul), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.

出版信息

CMAJ. 2021 Jun 14;193(24):E895-E905. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.201915.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Analgesics that contain codeine are commonly prescribed for postoperative pain, but it is unclear how they compare with nonopioid alternatives. We sought to compare the effectiveness of codeine and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for adults who underwent outpatient surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing codeine and NSAIDs for postoperative pain in outpatient surgery. We searched MEDLINE and Embase from inception to October 2019 for eligible studies. Our primary outcome was the patient pain score, converted to a standard 10-point intensity scale. Our secondary outcomes were patient-reported global assessments and adverse effects. We used random-effects models and grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) to assess the quality of evidence.

RESULTS

Forty studies, including 102 trial arms and 5116 patients, met inclusion criteria. The studies had low risk of bias and low-to-moderate heterogeneity. Compared with codeine, NSAIDs were associated with better pain scores at 6 hours (weighted mean difference [WMD] 0.93 points, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71 to 1.15) and at 12 hours (WMD 0.79, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.19). Stronger NSAID superiority at 6 hours was observed among trials where acetaminophen was coadministered at equivalent doses between groups (WMD 1.18, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.48). NSAIDs were associated with better global assessments at 6 hours (WMD -0.88, 95% CI -1.04 to -0.72) and at 24 hours (WMD -0.67, 95% CI -0.95 to -0.40), and were associated with fewer adverse effects, including bleeding events.

INTERPRETATION

We found that adult outpatients report better pain scores, better global assessments and fewer adverse effects when their postoperative pain is treated with NSAIDs than with codeine. Clinicians across all specialties can use this information to improve both pain management and opioid stewardship.

摘要

背景

含可待因的镇痛药常用于术后疼痛,但它们与非阿片类替代药物相比如何尚不清楚。我们旨在比较可待因和非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)用于门诊手术成人患者的疗效。

方法

我们对比较门诊手术中可待因和 NSAIDs 用于术后疼痛的随机对照试验进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。我们从 MEDLINE 和 Embase 数据库的创建起至 2019 年 10 月对合格研究进行了检索。我们的主要结局是患者疼痛评分,转换为标准的 10 分强度量表。我们的次要结局是患者报告的总体评估和不良反应。我们使用随机效应模型和推荐评估、制定与评价(GRADE)分级来评估证据质量。

结果

40 项研究,包括 102 个试验臂和 5116 名患者,符合纳入标准。这些研究的偏倚风险低,异质性低至中度。与可待因相比,NSAIDs 在 6 小时(加权均数差 [WMD] 0.93 分,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.71 至 1.15)和 12 小时(WMD 0.79,95% CI 0.38 至 1.19)时疼痛评分更好。在组间给予等效剂量的对乙酰氨基酚的试验中,NSAIDs 在 6 小时时具有更强的优势(WMD 1.18,95% CI 0.87 至 1.48)。NSAIDs 在 6 小时(WMD -0.88,95% CI -1.04 至 -0.72)和 24 小时(WMD -0.67,95% CI -0.95 至 -0.40)时的总体评估更好,且不良反应更少,包括出血事件。

结论

我们发现,与可待因相比,门诊手术成年患者在使用 NSAIDs 治疗术后疼痛时报告的疼痛评分更好、总体评估更好且不良反应更少。所有专业的临床医生都可以利用这些信息来改善疼痛管理和阿片类药物管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6daa/8248454/2af920795fe3/193e895f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验