Vanover Jennifer, Sun Jingru, Deka Srilekha, Kintner Jennifer, Duffourc Michelle M, Schoborg Robert V
Department of Microbiology, James H. Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614-0579, USA.
ViroMed Laboratories, Minnetonka, MN, USA.
Microbiology (Reading). 2008 Mar;154(Pt 3):971-978. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/012161-0.
Several inducers of chlamydial persistence have been described, including interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), IFN-alpha, IFN-beta, and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) exposure, and iron, amino acid or glucose deprivation. A tissue-culture model of Chlamydia trachomatis/herpes simplex virus type-2 (HSV-2) co-infection indicates that viral co-infection stimulates the formation of persistent chlamydiae. This study was designed to ascertain whether co-infection-induced persistence is mediated by a previously characterized mechanism. Luminex assays indicate that IFN-gamma, IFN-alpha, and TNF-alpha are not released from co-infected cells. Semiquantitative RT-PCR studies demonstrate that IFN-beta, IFN-gamma, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, lymphotoxin-alpha and inducible nitric oxide synthase are not expressed during co-infection. These data indicate that viral-induced persistence is not stimulated by any persistence-associated cytokine. Supplementation of co-infected cells with excess amino acids, iron-saturated holotransferrin, glucose or a combination of amino acids and iron does not restore chlamydial infectivity, demonstrating that HSV-2-induced persistence is not mediated by depletion of these nutrients. Finally, inclusions within co-infected cells continue to enlarge and incorporate C(6)-NBD-ceramide, indicating that HSV-2 co-infection does not inhibit vesicular transport to the developing inclusion. Collectively these data demonstrate that co-infection-induced persistence is not mediated by any currently characterized persistence inducer or anti-chlamydial pathway. Previous studies indicate that HSV-2 attachment and/or entry into the host cell is sufficient for stimulating chlamydial persistence, suggesting that viral attachment and/or entry may trigger a novel host pathway which restricts chlamydial development.
已描述了几种衣原体持续性感染的诱导因素,包括γ干扰素(IFN-γ)、α干扰素、β干扰素和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)暴露,以及铁、氨基酸或葡萄糖缺乏。沙眼衣原体/2型单纯疱疹病毒(HSV-2)共感染的组织培养模型表明,病毒共感染会刺激持续性衣原体的形成。本研究旨在确定共感染诱导的持续性是否由先前已明确的机制介导。Luminex分析表明,IFN-γ、IFN-α和TNF-α并非从共感染细胞中释放。半定量逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)研究表明,共感染期间不表达β干扰素、IFN-γ、吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶、淋巴毒素-α和诱导型一氧化氮合酶。这些数据表明,病毒诱导的持续性并非由任何与持续性相关的细胞因子所刺激。用过量氨基酸、铁饱和全转铁蛋白、葡萄糖或氨基酸与铁的组合补充共感染细胞并不能恢复衣原体的感染性,这表明HSV-2诱导的持续性并非由这些营养物质的缺乏所介导。最后,共感染细胞内的包涵体继续增大并掺入C(6)-NBD-神经酰胺,这表明HSV-2共感染并不抑制向正在形成的包涵体的囊泡转运。这些数据共同表明,共感染诱导的持续性并非由任何目前已明确的持续性诱导因素或抗衣原体途径所介导。先前的研究表明,HSV-2附着和/或进入宿主细胞足以刺激衣原体持续性感染,这表明病毒附着和/或进入可能触发一种新的宿主途径,从而限制衣原体的发育。