Pang Peter S, Cleland John G F, Teerlink John R, Collins Sean P, Lindsell Christopher J, Sopko George, Peacock W Frank, Fonarow Gregg C, Aldeen Amer Z, Kirk J Douglas, Storrow Alan B, Tavares Miguel, Mebazaa Alexandre, Roland Edmond, Massie Barry M, Maisel Alan S, Komajda Michel, Filippatos Gerasimos, Gheorghiade Mihai
Department of Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Eur Heart J. 2008 Mar;29(6):816-24. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn048. Epub 2008 Mar 1.
Dyspnoea is the most common presenting symptom amongst patients with acute heart failure syndromes (AHFS). It is distressing to patients and therefore an important target for treatment in clinical practice, clinical trials, and for regulatory approval of novel agents. Despite its importance as a treatment target, no consensus exists on how to assess dyspnoea in this setting. There is a considerable uncertainty about the reproducibility of the various instruments used to measure dyspnoea, their ability to reflect changes in symptoms and whether they accurately reflect the patient's experience. Little attempt has been made to ensure consistent implementation with respect to patients' posture during assessment or timing in relationship to therapy. There is also limited understanding of how rapidly and completely dyspnoea responds to standard therapy. A standardized method with which to assess dyspnoea is required for clinical trials of AHFS in order to ensure uniform collection of data on a key endpoint. We propose the Provocative Dyspnoea Assessment, a method of measurement that combines sequential dyspnoea provocation by positioning and walking with a dyspnoea self assessment using a five-point Likert scale, to yield a final Dyspnoea Severity Score. This proposed tool requires detailed validation but has face validity for the uniform assessment of dyspnoea.
呼吸困难是急性心力衰竭综合征(AHFS)患者中最常见的首发症状。它令患者痛苦不堪,因此在临床实践、临床试验以及新型药物的监管审批中都是重要的治疗靶点。尽管其作为治疗靶点很重要,但在这种情况下如何评估呼吸困难尚无共识。用于测量呼吸困难的各种工具的可重复性、它们反映症状变化的能力以及是否准确反映患者体验存在相当大的不确定性。在评估过程中关于患者姿势或与治疗相关的时间安排方面,几乎没有努力确保一致的实施。对于呼吸困难对标准治疗的反应速度和程度也了解有限。为了确保在AHFS临床试验中统一收集关键终点的数据,需要一种标准化的方法来评估呼吸困难。我们提出了激发性呼吸困难评估法,这是一种测量方法,它将通过体位和行走进行的序贯性呼吸困难激发与使用五点李克特量表进行的呼吸困难自我评估相结合,以得出最终的呼吸困难严重程度评分。这个提议的工具需要详细验证,但在统一评估呼吸困难方面具有表面效度。