Evans D G R, Young K, Bulman M, Shenton A, Wallace A, Lalloo F
Academic Unit of Medical Genetics and Regional Genetics Service, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Clin Genet. 2008 Apr;73(4):338-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2008.00974.x. Epub 2008 Feb 26.
While there are many reports in the literature of mutation testing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in breast/ovarian cancer families, the question of which type of ovarian cancers are relevant still pertains. We have undertaken whole gene screening including multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification in an affected individual within 442 unrelated non-Jewish families containing at least one reported ovarian cancer diagnosed less than 50 years or at any age with family history of breast or ovarian cancer for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. A total of 166 mutations were identified 110 (25%) in BRCA1 and 56 (13%) in BRCA2. In families without confirmation of ovarian diagnosis, the detection rate drops significantly. In families fulfilling Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium (BCLC) criteria with confirmed ovarian cancer cases, the mutation detection frequency was 80%. If only BCLC families with unconfirmed ovarian cancers were included, the detection rate dropped to 36% when a relevant ovarian cancer diagnosis was not confirmed. In BCLC families containing only one ovarian cancer, BRCA2 accounted for 45% of identified mutations. No mutations were identified in affected individuals with borderline or mucinous tumours. Detection rates dropped below the 10/20% international thresholds in a number of families with unconfirmed ovarian cancers. Borderline/mucinous pathology substantially reduces the likelihood of identifying a BRCA1/2 mutation. Strenuous efforts should be made to confirm ovarian pathology if the lack of confirmation or refuting the diagnosis would decrease a family's likelihood of mutation detection below screening thresholds. In the UK, a higher proportion of families harbour BRCA2 pathogenic mutations than predicted from previous studies.
虽然文献中有许多关于乳腺癌/卵巢癌家族中BRCA1和BRCA2突变检测的报道,但哪种类型的卵巢癌与之相关的问题仍然存在。我们对442个无血缘关系的非犹太家族中至少有一名报告的卵巢癌患者进行了全基因筛查,包括多重连接依赖探针扩增,这些患者年龄小于50岁或任何年龄,有乳腺癌或卵巢癌家族史,以检测BRCA1和BRCA2中的突变。共鉴定出166个突变,其中BRCA1中有110个(25%),BRCA2中有56个(13%)。在未确诊卵巢癌的家族中,检测率显著下降。在符合乳腺癌连锁协会(BCLC)标准且卵巢癌病例确诊的家族中,突变检测频率为80%。如果仅纳入卵巢癌未确诊的BCLC家族,当相关卵巢癌诊断未得到证实时,检测率降至36%。在仅包含一例卵巢癌的BCLC家族中,BRCA2占已鉴定突变的45%。在交界性或黏液性肿瘤患者中未鉴定出突变。在一些卵巢癌未确诊的家族中,检测率低于10%/20%的国际阈值。交界性/黏液性病理特征显著降低了鉴定BRCA1/2突变的可能性。如果缺乏确诊或否定诊断会使家族突变检测的可能性降至筛查阈值以下,则应大力努力确认卵巢病理情况。在英国,携带BRCA2致病突变的家族比例高于先前研究的预测。