• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The mental health service crisis of neoliberalism -- an antipodean perspective.

作者信息

Carney Terry

机构信息

University of Sydney, 173-175 Phillip St, Sydney 2000 Australia.

出版信息

Int J Law Psychiatry. 2008 Mar-Apr;31(2):101-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.02.001. Epub 2008 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.02.001
PMID:18314192
Abstract

Major transformations in forms of governance of the liberal state have been wrought over the course of the last century, including the rise of neoliberalism and 'new public management.' Mental health too has witnessed change, with pharmacological treatment displacing residential care, a shift to community-based services, mainstreaming with general health care, and greater reliance on civil society institutions such as the family or markets. This article considers whether mental health law, and its court/tribunal 'gatekeepers' have kept pace with those changes. It argues that the focus of the liberal project needs to shift to measures which will better guarantee access to mental health services, and keep a more watchful eye on both 'hidden' coercion of people on community treatment orders, and passive neglect of human need.

摘要

相似文献

1
The mental health service crisis of neoliberalism -- an antipodean perspective.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2008 Mar-Apr;31(2):101-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.02.001. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
2
PLC or TLC: is outpatient commitment the/an answer?强化个案管理或治疗性个案管理:门诊强制治疗是解决之道吗?
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2006 Nov-Dec;29(6):451-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.08.001. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
3
[Coercion always necessary in psychiatry].[精神病学中强制手段总是必要的]
Lakartidningen. 2006;103(48):3856-7.
4
Changing trends in mental health legislation: anatomy of reforming a civil commitment law.心理健康立法的变化趋势:一部民事收容法的改革剖析
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996 Winter;21(4):771-805.
5
What would Mary Douglas do? A commentary on Kahan et al., "Cultural cognition and public policy: the case of outpatient commitment laws".玛丽·道格拉斯会怎么做?对卡恩等人的评论,“文化认知与公共政策:门诊承诺法的案例”。
Law Hum Behav. 2010 Jun;34(3):176-85. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9184-x. Epub 2009 May 22.
6
Does fear of coercion keep people away from mental health treatment? Evidence from a survey of persons with schizophrenia and mental health professionals.对强制治疗的恐惧会使人们远离心理健康治疗吗?来自一项针对精神分裂症患者及心理健康专业人员的调查证据。
Behav Sci Law. 2003;21(4):459-72. doi: 10.1002/bsl.539.
7
Revamping mental health care in Israel: from the Netanyahu Commission to National Health Insurance Law.以色列心理健康护理的改革:从内塔尼亚胡委员会到《国家健康保险法》
Soc Work Health Care. 1997;25(3):119-29. doi: 10.1300/J010v25n03_10.
8
The past, present and future of mental health law: a therapeutic jurisprudence analysis.心理健康法的过去、现在与未来:一种治疗法理学分析
Law Context. 2003;20(2):24-53.
9
Decisions by and for people with mental retardation: balancing considerations of autonomy and protection.智障人士自身做出的决定以及为他们做出的决定:平衡自主性与保护性考量。
Villanova Law Rev. 1992;37(6):1779-809.
10
Gold Award: Reducing the admissions of high-risk chronic patients to state institutions. Gulf Coast Regional Mental Health-Mental Retardation Center, Galveston, Texas.金奖:减少高危慢性病患者入住国家机构的人数。德克萨斯州加尔维斯顿市墨西哥湾沿岸地区心理健康与智力障碍中心。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1980 Oct;31(10):690-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the priority of human rights and mental health: the PHRAME approach.评估人权与精神健康的优先事项:PHRAME方法。
BJPsych Open. 2023 Mar 27;9(2):e56. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.41.
2
A qualitative study examining the presence and consequences of moral framings in patients' and mental health workers' experiences of community treatment orders.一项定性研究,考察社区治疗令在患者及心理健康工作者经历中的道德框架的存在情况及后果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Nov 6;15:274. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0653-0.