Gardner A W, Poehlman E T
Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Gerontology, University of Maryland, USA.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1998 Jul;53(4):M275-80. doi: 10.1093/gerona/53a.4.m275.
The purpose of this study was to compare physical activity assessed by monitoring devices and questionnaires with the criterion method of physical activity using doubly labeled water (DLW) in free-living peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) patients.
Twenty-two older nonsmoking PAOD patients with intermittent claudication (age = 68.7 +/- 7.3 years, ankle/brachial index = 0.67 +/- 0.21) were recruited from the Vascular Clinic at the Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical Center. The energy expenditure of physical activity (EEPA) was calculated using DLW. Physical activity values were also obtained by activity monitors (an accelerometer and a pedometer worn on each hip over a 48-h period) and by three activity questionnaires (the Minnesota Leisure-Time Physical Activity, the Peripheral Arterial Disease Physical Activity Recall, and the NASA Johnson Space Center questionnaire).
As expected, the claudicants were sedentary, as EEPA was 378 +/- 190 kcal/day. The activity value from the accelerometer was highly correlated with EEPA, yielding a regression equation of EEPA (kcal/day) = 81.6 + (0.599 x accelerometer kcal/day); R = .834, R2 = .696, standard error of estimate = 77 kcal/day, p = .001. The activity value from the pedometer was also correlated with EEPA, yielding a regression equation of EEPA (kcal/day) = 76.6 + (0.048 x pedometer steps/day); R = .614, R2 = .377, standard error of estimate = 124 kcal/day, p = .002. None of the physical activity questionnaires was significantly correlated with EEPA, as the correlation coefficients ranged between .037 and .326.
Free-living daily physical activity of older PAOD patients with intermittent claudication can be accurately predicted with an accelerometer, and to a lesser extent with a pedometer, worn over a 48-h period.
本研究旨在比较在自由生活的外周动脉闭塞性疾病(PAOD)患者中,通过监测设备和问卷评估的身体活动与使用双标水(DLW)的身体活动标准方法。
从巴尔的摩退伍军人事务医疗中心的血管诊所招募了22名患有间歇性跛行的老年非吸烟PAOD患者(年龄 = 68.7±7.3岁,踝臂指数 = 0.67±0.21)。使用DLW计算身体活动的能量消耗(EEPA)。还通过活动监测器(在每个臀部佩戴48小时的加速度计和计步器)和三份活动问卷(明尼苏达休闲时间身体活动问卷、外周动脉疾病身体活动回忆问卷和美国国家航空航天局约翰逊航天中心问卷)获得身体活动值。
正如预期的那样,间歇性跛行患者久坐不动,EEPA为378±190千卡/天。加速度计的活动值与EEPA高度相关,得出EEPA(千卡/天)= 81.6 +(0.599×加速度计千卡/天)的回归方程;R = 0.834,R² = 0.696,估计标准误差 = 77千卡/天,p = 0.001。计步器的活动值也与EEPA相关,得出EEPA(千卡/天)= 76.6 +(0.048×计步器步数/天)的回归方程;R = 0.614,R² = 0.377,估计标准误差 = 124千卡/天,p = 0.002。没有一份身体活动问卷与EEPA显著相关,因为相关系数在0.037至0.326之间。
对于患有间歇性跛行的老年PAOD患者,在48小时内佩戴加速度计可以准确预测其自由生活中的日常身体活动,计步器的预测程度稍低。