• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向双过程推理与判断的生理学:柠檬水、意志力与基于规则的昂贵分析

Toward a physiology of dual-process reasoning and judgment: lemonade, willpower, and expensive rule-based analysis.

作者信息

Masicampo E J, Baumeister Roy F

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4301, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2008 Mar;19(3):255-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02077.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02077.x
PMID:18315798
Abstract

This experiment used the attraction effect to test the hypothesis that ingestion of sugar can reduce reliance on intuitive, heuristic-based decision making. In the attraction effect, a difficult choice between two options is swayed by the presence of a seemingly irrelevant "decoy" option. We replicated this effect and the finding that the effect increases when people have depleted their mental resources performing a previous self-control task. Our hypothesis was based on the assumption that effortful processes require and consume relatively large amounts of glucose (brain fuel), and that this use of glucose is why people use heuristic strategies after exerting self-control. Before performing any tasks, some participants drank lemonade sweetened with sugar, which restores blood glucose, whereas others drank lemonade containing a sugar substitute. Only lemonade with sugar reduced the attraction effect. These results show one way in which the body (blood glucose) interacts with the mind (self-control and reliance on heuristics).

摘要

本实验利用吸引力效应来检验以下假设

摄入糖分可以减少对基于直觉、启发式的决策方式的依赖。在吸引力效应中,两个选项之间的艰难抉择会受到一个看似无关的“诱饵”选项的影响。我们重复了这一效应,并且发现当人们在完成先前的自我控制任务后耗尽了心理资源时,该效应会增强。我们的假设基于这样的假定:费力的认知过程需要并消耗相对大量的葡萄糖(大脑的燃料),而正是这种对葡萄糖的消耗导致人们在进行自我控制后使用启发式策略。在执行任何任务之前,一些参与者饮用了加糖的柠檬水,这可以恢复血糖,而其他参与者则饮用了含有糖替代品的柠檬水。只有加糖的柠檬水降低了吸引力效应。这些结果显示了身体(血糖)与思维(自我控制和对启发式的依赖)相互作用的一种方式。

相似文献

1
Toward a physiology of dual-process reasoning and judgment: lemonade, willpower, and expensive rule-based analysis.迈向双过程推理与判断的生理学:柠檬水、意志力与基于规则的昂贵分析
Psychol Sci. 2008 Mar;19(3):255-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02077.x.
2
Logic feels so good-I like it! Evidence for intuitive detection of logicality in syllogistic reasoning.逻辑感觉真好!我喜欢!三段论推理中对逻辑性的直观检测的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 May;38(3):596-616. doi: 10.1037/a0026099. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
3
Automatic and controlled components of judgment and decision making.判断与决策中的自动与受控成分。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(5):797-813. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.797.
4
Logic and belief across the lifespan: the rise and fall of belief inhibition during syllogistic reasoning.一生中的逻辑与信念:三段论推理中信念抑制的起伏
Dev Sci. 2009 Jan;12(1):123-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00746.x.
5
Intuition, reason, and metacognition.直觉、推理和元认知。
Cogn Psychol. 2011 Nov;63(3):107-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
6
Self-control without a "self"?: common self-control processes in humans and dogs.没有“自我”的自我控制?人类和狗共有的自我控制过程。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Apr;21(4):534-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797610364968. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
7
Belief inhibition during thinking: not always winning but at least taking part.思考过程中的信念抑制:并非总是获胜,但至少参与其中。
Cognition. 2009 Oct;113(1):45-61. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.07.009. Epub 2009 Aug 22.
8
Decisions among time saving options: when intuition is strong and wrong.节省时间的选项之间的决策:当直觉强烈但错误时。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Feb;127(2):501-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.09.003. Epub 2007 Oct 23.
9
How to explain receptivity to conjunction-fallacy inhibition training: evidence from the Iowa gambling task.如何解释对合取谬误抑制训练的接受度:来自爱荷华赌博任务的证据。
Brain Cogn. 2010 Apr;72(3):378-84. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.11.004. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
10
Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles.直观判断和深思熟虑的判断基于共同的原则。
Psychol Rev. 2011 Jan;118(1):97-109. doi: 10.1037/a0020762.

引用本文的文献

1
Disease cause attribution and preference for low versus high self-management treatments.疾病病因归因以及对低自我管理治疗与高自我管理治疗的偏好。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 22;15(1):26550. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11710-7.
2
Transitional Shock in Newly Graduated Registered Nurses From the Perspective of Self-Depletion and Impact on Cognitive Decision-Making: A Phenomenological Study.从自我损耗视角及对认知决策影响看新毕业注册护士的过渡性休克:一项现象学研究
J Nurs Manag. 2024 Oct 29;2024:6722892. doi: 10.1155/2024/6722892. eCollection 2024.
3
Ego Depletion and Time Pressure Promote Spontaneous Deception:An Event-Related Potential Study.
自我损耗与时间压力助长自发欺骗:一项事件相关电位研究
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2021 Sep 11;17(3):239-249. doi: 10.5709/acp-0333-8. eCollection 2021.
4
The Problem of Purity in Moral Psychology.道德心理学中的纯洁问题。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2023 Aug;27(3):272-308. doi: 10.1177/10888683221124741. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
5
Rethinking clinical decision-making to improve clinical reasoning.重新思考临床决策以改善临床推理。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 8;9:900543. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.900543. eCollection 2022.
6
Measuring Motivation for Cognitive Effort as State.将认知努力动机作为一种状态进行测量。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 9;12:785094. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.785094. eCollection 2021.
7
Individual differences in social distancing and mask-wearing in the pandemic of COVID-19: The role of need for cognition, self-control and risk attitude.新冠疫情期间社交距离和佩戴口罩的个体差异:认知需求、自我控制和风险态度的作用。
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Jun;175:110706. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110706. Epub 2021 Jan 31.
8
A Schema-Activation Approach to Failure and Success in Self-Control.一种关于自我控制中失败与成功的图式激活方法。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 15;11:2256. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02256. eCollection 2020.
9
Environmental Orderliness Affects Self-Control and Creative Thinking: The Moderating Effects of Trait Self-Control.环境有序性影响自我控制和创造性思维:特质自我控制的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 31;11:1515. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01515. eCollection 2020.
10
When a Combination of Nudges Decreases Sustainable Food Choices Out-Of-Home-The Example of Food Decoys and Descriptive Name Labels.当助推措施组合减少外出就餐时的可持续食物选择——以食物诱饵和描述性名称标签为例
Foods. 2020 May 2;9(5):557. doi: 10.3390/foods9050557.