• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于涉及儿童的预测性筛查中数据使用、保密和同意的观点。

Views on data use, confidentiality and consent in a predictive screening involving children.

作者信息

Helgesson G, Swartling U

机构信息

Unit for Bioethics, Department of LIME, Karolinska Institutet, Berzelius väg 3, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2008 Mar;34(3):206-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.020016.

DOI:10.1136/jme.2006.020016
PMID:18316465
Abstract

Data from the 5-6 year control questionnaire of the ABIS study, a Swedish prospective screening of children for Type 1 diabetes, indicates a genuine trust in the researchers--very few participating families expressed concern about their participation. Nevertheless, a majority do not want their research data to be used beyond the agreement of the original consent. They want to be asked for renewed consent in such cases. A vast majority also want potential high-risk information about their child to be communicated to them. Most participating families want this regardless of whether any preventive treatment is available. Although potential benefits for their child is a motivation for participation for a majority of the respondents, they also claim to be motivated by altruistic reasons. These results are compared to results from two similar studies in the UK.

摘要

ABIS研究是一项瑞典针对1型糖尿病儿童的前瞻性筛查,其5-6年对照调查问卷的数据表明,研究对象对研究人员有着真正的信任——很少有参与研究的家庭对参与研究表示担忧。然而,大多数人不希望在超出原始同意书约定的范围使用他们的研究数据。在这种情况下,他们希望被询问是否同意再次使用。绝大多数人还希望了解有关其子女的潜在高风险信息。无论是否有任何预防性治疗,大多数参与研究的家庭都希望如此。尽管对大多数受访者来说,孩子可能获得的益处是参与研究的一个动机,但他们也声称是出于利他主义的原因。这些结果与英国两项类似研究的结果进行了比较。

相似文献

1
Views on data use, confidentiality and consent in a predictive screening involving children.关于涉及儿童的预测性筛查中数据使用、保密和同意的观点。
J Med Ethics. 2008 Mar;34(3):206-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.020016.
2
Information and informed consent in a longitudinal screening involving children: a questionnaire survey.一项涉及儿童的纵向筛查中的信息与知情同意:问卷调查
Eur J Hum Genet. 2005 Mar;13(3):376-83. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201336.
3
Split views among parents regarding children's right to decide about participation in research: a questionnaire survey.父母对于孩子决定是否参与研究的权利存在不同看法:一项问卷调查
J Med Ethics. 2009 Jul;35(7):450-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.027383.
4
Practical matters, rather than lack of trust, motivate non-participation in a long-term cohort trial.实际问题而非缺乏信任促使人们不参与长期队列研究。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2009 Sep;10(6):408-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2008.00498.x. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
5
Ethical issues associated with conducting genetic family studies of complex disease.与开展复杂疾病的基因家族研究相关的伦理问题。
Ann Epidemiol. 2005 Oct;15(9):712-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.09.010.
6
Parent responses to participation in genetic screening for diabetes risk.父母对参与糖尿病风险基因筛查的反应。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2004 Dec;5(4):174-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-543X.2004.00070.x.
7
Building on relationships of trust in biobank research.基于生物样本库研究中的信任关系。
J Med Ethics. 2005 Jul;31(7):415-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.009456.
8
Self-assessed understanding as a tool for evaluating consent: reflections on a longitudinal study.自我评估的理解作为评估同意的一种工具:对一项纵向研究的思考
J Med Ethics. 2008 Jul;34(7):557-62. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.018143.
9
Ethical issues in couple and family research.伴侣与家庭研究中的伦理问题。
J Fam Psychol. 2005 Mar;19(1):157-67. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.19.1.157.
10
[A modified informed-consent procedure in which the complete information is given retrospectively: no objection from participating patients].一种修改后的知情同意程序,即回顾性地提供完整信息:参与的患者无异议
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005 Jan 1;149(1):29-32.

引用本文的文献

1
Information and Parental Consent for French Neonatal Screening: A Qualitative Study on Parental Opinion.法国新生儿筛查的信息与家长同意:关于家长意见的定性研究
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2023 May 3;9(2):26. doi: 10.3390/ijns9020026.
2
Clinicians' views and experiences of offering two alternative consent pathways for participation in a preterm intrapartum trial: a qualitative study.临床医生对于提供两种参与早产分娩期试验的替代同意途径的观点和经验:一项定性研究
Trials. 2017 Apr 26;18(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1940-5.
3
Parental Estimation of Their Child's Increased Type 1 Diabetes Risk During the First 2 Years of Participation in an International Observational Study: Results From the TEDDY study.
在一项国际观察性研究的头两年中,父母对其子女患1型糖尿病风险增加的估计:TEDDY研究结果
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016 Apr;11(2):106-14. doi: 10.1177/1556264616648589. Epub 2016 May 30.
4
Experience, knowledge, and opinions about childhood genetic testing in Batten disease.关于神经鞘脂贮积症(Batten 病)儿童基因检测的经验、知识和意见。
Mol Genet Metab. 2014 Feb;111(2):197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2013.10.017. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
5
Behavioral Science Research Informs Bioethical Issues in the Conduct of Large-Scale Studies of Children's Disease Risk.行为科学研究为儿童疾病风险大规模研究中的生物伦理问题提供信息。
AJOB Prim Res. 2013 Jan 1;4(3):4-14. doi: 10.1080/21507716.2013.806968.
6
Psychometric properties of the Pediatric Testing Attitudes Scale-Diabetes (P-TAS-D) for parents of children undergoing predictive risk screening.用于接受预测风险筛查的儿童的父母的儿科测试态度量表-糖尿病(P-TAS-D)的心理测量特性。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2013 Dec;14(8):602-10. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12053. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
7
Parental views on informed consent for expanded newborn screening.父母对扩大新生儿筛查的知情同意的看法。
Health Expect. 2013 Sep;16(3):239-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00710.x. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
8
Psychological impact of screening and prediction in type 1 diabetes.1 型糖尿病筛查和预测的心理影响。
Curr Diab Rep. 2011 Oct;11(5):454-9. doi: 10.1007/s11892-011-0208-9.
9
The value of using top-down and bottom-up approaches for building trust and transparency in biobanking.采用自上而下和自下而上的方法在生物样本库中建立信任和透明度的价值。
Public Health Genomics. 2010;13(4):207-14. doi: 10.1159/000279622. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
10
Exclusive breastfeeding of Swedish children and its possible influence on the development of obesity: a prospective cohort study.瑞典儿童的纯母乳喂养及其对肥胖发展的可能影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2008 Oct 9;8:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-8-42.