• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

行为科学研究为儿童疾病风险大规模研究中的生物伦理问题提供信息。

Behavioral Science Research Informs Bioethical Issues in the Conduct of Large-Scale Studies of Children's Disease Risk.

作者信息

Tercyak Kenneth P, Swartling Ulrica, Mays Darren, Johnson Suzanne Bennett, Ludvigsson Johnny

机构信息

Associate Professor, Director of Behavioral Prevention Research, Division of Population Sciences, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100 Washington, DC 20007, USA.

出版信息

AJOB Prim Res. 2013 Jan 1;4(3):4-14. doi: 10.1080/21507716.2013.806968.

DOI:10.1080/21507716.2013.806968
PMID:23977442
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3747010/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Birth cohort studies of the natural history of pediatric common disease risk raise many bioethical issues, including re-consenting participants over time as children mature and cohort retention. Understanding participants' study-specific knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behavior may offer insights into these issues from a psychological perspective.

METHODS

We conducted an analysis of factors associated with parent-child communication about minor children's participation in a population-based birth cohort; children's knowledge about their own participation; and parental willingness to be re-contacted for future study among Swedish parents ( = 3,605) of children originally enrolled at birth in a prospective study of type 1 diabetes risk.

RESULTS

More open parent-child communication about disease risk screening research and greater knowledge among children about their own research participation facilitated greater parent willingness to participate in further study. Parents' decisions about further study participation were most strongly favorable among those who communicated openly with their child and with high study-specific knowledge.

CONCLUSIONS

Epidemiologists, bioethicists, and others involved in the design and conduct of large-scale, prospective birth cohorts may consider embedding periodic assessments of participants' study-specific attitudes and behavior to address long-term retention and willingness to engage in future research.

摘要

背景

儿科常见疾病风险自然史的出生队列研究引发了许多生物伦理问题,包括随着儿童成长对参与者进行重新同意以及队列保留。从心理学角度了解参与者特定于研究的知识、态度、信念和行为可能有助于洞察这些问题。

方法

我们对与父母 - 子女就幼儿参与基于人群的出生队列进行沟通的相关因素;儿童对自身参与情况的了解;以及瑞典父母(n = 3605)中愿意在未来研究中被再次联系的情况进行了分析,这些儿童最初在一项1型糖尿病风险前瞻性研究中于出生时入组。

结果

关于疾病风险筛查研究的亲子沟通越开放,儿童对自身研究参与情况的了解越多,父母参与进一步研究的意愿就越高。在那些与孩子进行了开放沟通且对研究有较高特定知识的父母中,他们关于进一步参与研究的决定最为积极。

结论

参与大规模前瞻性出生队列设计和实施的流行病学家、生物伦理学家及其他人员,可能会考虑对参与者特定于研究的态度和行为进行定期评估,以解决长期保留问题以及参与未来研究的意愿。

相似文献

1
Behavioral Science Research Informs Bioethical Issues in the Conduct of Large-Scale Studies of Children's Disease Risk.行为科学研究为儿童疾病风险大规模研究中的生物伦理问题提供信息。
AJOB Prim Res. 2013 Jan 1;4(3):4-14. doi: 10.1080/21507716.2013.806968.
2
Creating opportunities for parent empowerment: program effects on the mental health/coping outcomes of critically ill young children and their mothers.为家长赋权创造机会:该项目对危重症幼儿及其母亲心理健康/应对结果的影响。
Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6):e597-607. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.6.e597.
3
Advance care planning for children with special health care needs: a survey of parental attitudes.为有特殊医疗需求的儿童进行预先护理规划:家长态度调查
Pediatrics. 1996 May;97(5):682-7.
4
A family-based approach to the prevention of depressive symptoms in children at risk: evidence of parental and child change.一种基于家庭的方法预防有风险儿童的抑郁症状:父母和儿童变化的证据。
Pediatrics. 2003 Aug;112(2):e119-31. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.2.e119.
5
Factors That Affect Chinese Parents' Willingness to Donate Children's Biospecimens in Pediatric Research.影响中国父母在儿科研究中捐赠孩子生物样本意愿的因素。
Biopreserv Biobank. 2018 Dec;16(6):402-410. doi: 10.1089/bio.2018.0051. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
6
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
7
Parental attitudes and willingness to donate children's biospecimens for congenital heart disease research: a cross-sectional study in Shanghai, China.父母对捐赠儿童生物样本用于先天性心脏病研究的态度及意愿:中国上海的一项横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 17;8(10):e022290. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022290.
8
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.迈向政治发展科学。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.
9
Psychometric properties of the Pediatric Testing Attitudes Scale-Diabetes (P-TAS-D) for parents of children undergoing predictive risk screening.用于接受预测风险筛查的儿童的父母的儿科测试态度量表-糖尿病(P-TAS-D)的心理测量特性。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2013 Dec;14(8):602-10. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12053. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
10
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.

本文引用的文献

1
Resolving the variable genome and epigenome in human disease.解析人类疾病中的可变基因组和表观基因组。
J Intern Med. 2012 Apr;271(4):379-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02508.x.
2
A grand challenge for applied genetic epidemiology: putting the human genome in context.应用遗传流行病学面临的一项重大挑战:将人类基因组置于具体情境中。
Front Genet. 2011 Mar 3;2:10. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2011.00010. eCollection 2011.
3
"My parents decide if I can. I decide if I want to." Children's views on participation in medical research.“我父母决定我是否可以。我决定我是否愿意。”儿童对参与医学研究的看法。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Dec;6(4):68-75. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.68.
4
A systematic review of the effect of retention methods in population-based cohort studies.基于人群队列研究中保留方法效果的系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Apr 19;11:249. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-249.
5
The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) study: predictors of early study withdrawal among participants with no family history of type 1 diabetes.幼年起病的糖尿病环境决定因素(TEDDY)研究:1 型糖尿病家族史阴性参与者早期退出研究的预测因素。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2011 May;12(3 Pt 1):165-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2010.00686.x. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
6
The storage and use of biological tissue samples from minors for research: a focus group study.未成年人生物组织样本用于研究的储存与使用:一项焦点小组研究。
Public Health Genomics. 2011;14(2):68-76. doi: 10.1159/000294185. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
7
An integrative approach to health.整体健康方法。
Demography. 2010 Feb;47(1):1-22. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0091.
8
Handling ethical, legal and social issues in birth cohort studies involving genetic research: responses from studies in six countries.处理涉及遗传研究的出生队列研究中的伦理、法律和社会问题:来自六个国家的研究的回应。
BMC Med Ethics. 2010 Mar 23;11:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-11-4.
9
Growing up as a research subject: ethical and legal issues in birth cohort studies involving genetic research.作为研究对象成长:涉及基因研究的出生队列研究中的伦理和法律问题。
Health Law J. 2007;15:1-41.
10
Split views among parents regarding children's right to decide about participation in research: a questionnaire survey.父母对于孩子决定是否参与研究的权利存在不同看法:一项问卷调查
J Med Ethics. 2009 Jul;35(7):450-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.027383.