Cesarini David, Dawes Christopher T, Fowler James H, Johannesson Magnus, Lichtenstein Paul, Wallace Björn
Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 50 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Mar 11;105(10):3721-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710069105. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
Although laboratory experiments document cooperative behavior in humans, little is known about the extent to which individual differences in cooperativeness result from genetic and environmental variation. In this article, we report the results of two independently conceived and executed studies of monozygotic and dizygotic twins, one in Sweden and one in the United States. The results from these studies suggest that humans are endowed with genetic variation that influences the decision to invest, and to reciprocate investment, in the classic trust game. Based on these findings, we urge social scientists to take seriously the idea that differences in peer and parental socialization are not the only forces that influence variation in cooperative behavior.
尽管实验室实验证明了人类的合作行为,但对于合作性的个体差异在多大程度上源于基因和环境变异,我们知之甚少。在本文中,我们报告了两项独立构思并实施的针对同卵双胞胎和异卵双胞胎的研究结果,一项在瑞典进行,另一项在美国进行。这些研究结果表明,人类具有影响在经典信任博弈中投资决策和回报投资决策的基因变异。基于这些发现,我们敦促社会科学家认真对待这样一种观点,即同伴和父母社会化的差异并非影响合作行为变异的唯一因素。