Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Jun;7(6):849-860. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01609-6. Epub 2023 May 15.
In the classical twin design, researchers compare trait resemblance in cohorts of identical and non-identical twins to understand how genetic and environmental factors correlate with resemblance in behaviour and other phenotypes. The twin design is also a valuable tool for studying causality, intergenerational transmission, and gene-environment correlation and interaction. Here we review recent developments in twin studies, recent results from twin studies of new phenotypes and recent insights into twinning. We ask whether the results of existing twin studies are representative of the general population and of global diversity, and we conclude that stronger efforts to increase representativeness are needed. We provide an updated overview of twin concordance and discordance for major diseases and mental disorders, which conveys a crucial message: genetic influences are not as deterministic as many believe. This has important implications for public understanding of genetic risk prediction tools, as the accuracy of genetic predictions can never exceed identical twin concordance rates.
在经典的双胞胎设计中,研究人员比较同卵和非同卵双胞胎群体中特质的相似性,以了解行为和其他表型的相似性与遗传和环境因素的相关性。双胞胎设计也是研究因果关系、代际传递以及基因-环境相关性和相互作用的宝贵工具。在这里,我们回顾了双胞胎研究的最新进展、新表型的双胞胎研究的最新结果以及双胞胎现象的最新见解。我们询问了现有双胞胎研究的结果是否代表了一般人群和全球多样性,并得出结论,需要做出更大努力来提高代表性。我们提供了主要疾病和精神障碍的双胞胎一致性和不一致性的最新概述,这传达了一个关键信息:遗传影响并不像许多人想象的那样具有决定性。这对于公众理解遗传风险预测工具具有重要意义,因为遗传预测的准确性永远不可能超过同卵双胞胎的一致性率。