• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于结构的虚拟筛选与监督一致性评分:构象预测与富集因子评估

Structure-based virtual screening with supervised consensus scoring: evaluation of pose prediction and enrichment factors.

作者信息

Teramoto Reiji, Fukunishi Hiroaki

机构信息

Bio-IT Center and Nano Electronics Research Laboratories, NEC Corporation, 34, Miyukigaoka, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8501, Japan.

出版信息

J Chem Inf Model. 2008 Apr;48(4):747-54. doi: 10.1021/ci700464x. Epub 2008 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1021/ci700464x
PMID:18318474
Abstract

Since the evaluation of ligand conformations is a crucial aspect of structure-based virtual screening, scoring functions play significant roles in it. However, it is known that a scoring function does not always work well for all target proteins. When one cannot know which scoring function works best against a target protein a priori, there is no standard scoring method to know it even if 3D structure of a target protein-ligand complex is available. Therefore, development of the method to achieve high enrichments from given scoring functions and 3D structure of protein-ligand complex is a crucial and challenging task. To address this problem, we applied SCS (supervised consensus scoring), which employs a rough linear correlation between the binding free energy and the root-mean-square deviation (rmsd) of a native ligand conformations and incorporates protein-ligand binding process with docked ligand conformations using supervised learning, to virtual screening. We evaluated both the docking poses and enrichments of SCS and five scoring functions (F-Score, G-Score, D-Score, ChemScore, and PMF) for three different target proteins: thymidine kinase (TK), thrombin (thrombin), and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma). Our enrichment studies show that SCS is competitive or superior to a best single scoring function at the top ranks of screened database. We found that the enrichments of SCS could be limited by a best scoring function, because SCS is obtained on the basis of the five individual scoring functions. Therefore, it is concluded that SCS works very successfully from our results. Moreover, from docking pose analysis, we revealed the connection between enrichment and average centroid distance of top-scored docking poses. Since SCS requires only one 3D structure of protein-ligand complex, SCS will be useful for identifying new ligands.

摘要

由于配体构象的评估是基于结构的虚拟筛选的关键环节,评分函数在其中起着重要作用。然而,众所周知,评分函数并非对所有靶蛋白都能始终良好发挥作用。当无法事先知晓哪种评分函数对靶蛋白效果最佳时,即便有靶蛋白 - 配体复合物的三维结构,也没有标准的评分方法来确定这一点。因此,开发一种能从给定的评分函数和蛋白质 - 配体复合物的三维结构中实现高富集度的方法是一项关键且具有挑战性的任务。为解决此问题,我们将监督一致性评分(SCS)应用于虚拟筛选,该方法利用天然配体构象的结合自由能与均方根偏差(rmsd)之间的粗略线性相关性,并通过监督学习将蛋白质 - 配体结合过程与对接的配体构象相结合。我们针对三种不同的靶蛋白:胸苷激酶(TK)、凝血酶(thrombin)和过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ(PPARγ),评估了SCS以及五种评分函数(F - Score、G - Score、D - Score、ChemScore和PMF)的对接姿势和富集度。我们的富集度研究表明,在筛选数据库的前列排名中,SCS具有竞争力或优于最佳的单一评分函数。我们发现SCS的富集度可能会受到最佳评分函数的限制,因为SCS是基于五个单独的评分函数获得的。因此,从我们得到的结果可以得出结论,SCS非常成功。此外,通过对接姿势分析,我们揭示了富集度与高分对接姿势的平均质心距离之间的联系。由于SCS仅需要蛋白质 - 配体复合物的一个三维结构,SCS将有助于识别新的配体。

相似文献

1
Structure-based virtual screening with supervised consensus scoring: evaluation of pose prediction and enrichment factors.基于结构的虚拟筛选与监督一致性评分:构象预测与富集因子评估
J Chem Inf Model. 2008 Apr;48(4):747-54. doi: 10.1021/ci700464x. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
2
Supervised scoring models with docked ligand conformations for structure-based virtual screening.用于基于结构的虚拟筛选的带有对接配体构象的监督评分模型。
J Chem Inf Model. 2007 Sep-Oct;47(5):1858-67. doi: 10.1021/ci700116z. Epub 2007 Aug 9.
3
Consensus scoring with feature selection for structure-based virtual screening.基于结构的虚拟筛选中具有特征选择的共识评分
J Chem Inf Model. 2008 Feb;48(2):288-95. doi: 10.1021/ci700239t. Epub 2008 Jan 30.
4
Supervised consensus scoring for docking and virtual screening.对接和虚拟筛选的监督一致性评分
J Chem Inf Model. 2007 Mar-Apr;47(2):526-34. doi: 10.1021/ci6004993. Epub 2007 Feb 13.
5
The consequences of scoring docked ligand conformations using free energy correlations.使用自由能相关性对对接配体构象进行评分的后果。
Eur J Med Chem. 2007 Jul;42(7):921-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2006.12.037. Epub 2007 Jan 21.
6
DrugScore(CSD)-knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction.DrugScore(CSD)——一种基于小分子晶体数据的知识评分函数,对近天然配体构象具有卓越的识别率和更好的亲和力预测能力。
J Med Chem. 2005 Oct 6;48(20):6296-303. doi: 10.1021/jm050436v.
7
A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance.当前对接和评分方法在药物相关系统上的详细比较。
Proteins. 2004 Aug 1;56(2):235-49. doi: 10.1002/prot.20088.
8
Ligand bias of scoring functions in structure-based virtual screening.基于结构的虚拟筛选中评分函数的配体偏向性
J Chem Inf Model. 2006 May-Jun;46(3):1334-43. doi: 10.1021/ci050407t.
9
Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking.11种分子对接评分函数的比较评估
J Med Chem. 2003 Jun 5;46(12):2287-303. doi: 10.1021/jm0203783.
10
Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.用于蛋白激酶的配体对接和虚拟筛选中的蛋白质柔性
J Mol Biol. 2004 Mar 12;337(1):209-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.01.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Are predefined decoy sets of ligand poses able to quantify scoring function accuracy?预先定义的配体构象虚拟集能否定量评估打分函数的准确性?
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2012 Feb;26(2):185-97. doi: 10.1007/s10822-011-9539-5. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
2
Cheminformatics meets molecular mechanics: a combined application of knowledge-based pose scoring and physical force field-based hit scoring functions improves the accuracy of structure-based virtual screening. cheminformatics 与分子力学相结合:基于知识的构象评分和基于物理力场的命中评分函数的联合应用提高了基于结构的虚拟筛选的准确性。
J Chem Inf Model. 2012 Jan 23;52(1):16-28. doi: 10.1021/ci2002507. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
3
CSAR benchmark exercise of 2010: combined evaluation across all submitted scoring functions.
2010 年的 CSAR 基准测试练习:所有提交的评分函数的综合评估。
J Chem Inf Model. 2011 Sep 26;51(9):2115-31. doi: 10.1021/ci200269q. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
4
VoteDock: consensus docking method for prediction of protein-ligand interactions.VoteDock:用于预测蛋白质-配体相互作用的共识对接方法。
J Comput Chem. 2011 Mar;32(4):568-81. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21642. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
5
Target flexibility: an emerging consideration in drug discovery and design.靶点灵活性:药物发现与设计中一个新出现的考量因素。
J Med Chem. 2008 Oct 23;51(20):6237-55. doi: 10.1021/jm800562d. Epub 2008 Sep 12.