• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于结构的虚拟筛选中具有特征选择的共识评分

Consensus scoring with feature selection for structure-based virtual screening.

作者信息

Teramoto Reiji, Fukunishi Hiroaki

机构信息

Bio-IT Center, NEC Corporation, 34, Miyukigaoka, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8501, Japan.

出版信息

J Chem Inf Model. 2008 Feb;48(2):288-95. doi: 10.1021/ci700239t. Epub 2008 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1021/ci700239t
PMID:18229906
Abstract

The evaluation of ligand conformations is a crucial aspect of structure-based virtual screening, and scoring functions play significant roles in it. While consensus scoring (CS) generally improves enrichment by compensating for the deficiencies of each scoring function, the strategy of how individual scoring functions are selected remains a challenging task when few known active compounds are available. To address this problem, we propose feature selection-based consensus scoring (FSCS), which performs supervised feature selection with docked native ligand conformations to select complementary scoring functions. We evaluated the enrichments of five scoring functions (F-Score, D-Score, PMF, G-Score, and ChemScore), FSCS, and RCS (rank-by-rank consensus scoring) for four different target proteins: acetylcholine esterase (AChE), thrombin (thrombin), phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5), and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma). The results indicated that FSCS was able to select the complementary scoring functions and enhance ligand enrichments and that it outperformed RCS and the individual scoring functions for all target proteins. They also indicated that the performances of the single scoring functions were strongly dependent on the target protein. An especially favorable result with implications for practical drug screening is that FSCS performs well even if only one 3D structure of the protein-ligand complex is known. Moreover, we found that one can infer which scoring functions significantly enrich active compounds by using feature selection before actual docking and that the selected scoring functions are complementary.

摘要

配体构象的评估是基于结构的虚拟筛选的关键环节,评分函数在其中起着重要作用。虽然共识评分(CS)通常通过弥补每个评分函数的不足来提高富集效果,但在已知活性化合物较少的情况下,如何选择单个评分函数的策略仍然是一项具有挑战性的任务。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了基于特征选择的共识评分(FSCS),它利用对接的天然配体构象进行有监督的特征选择,以选择互补的评分函数。我们评估了五种评分函数(F-Score、D-Score、PMF、G-Score和ChemScore)、FSCS以及秩次秩次共识评分(RCS)对四种不同靶蛋白的富集效果:乙酰胆碱酯酶(AChE)、凝血酶(thrombin)、磷酸二酯酶5(PDE5)和过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ(PPARgamma)。结果表明,FSCS能够选择互补的评分函数并增强配体富集效果,并且在所有靶蛋白上均优于RCS和单个评分函数。结果还表明,单个评分函数的性能强烈依赖于靶蛋白。一个对实际药物筛选有重要意义的特别有利的结果是,即使仅知道蛋白质-配体复合物的一个三维结构,FSCS也表现良好。此外,我们发现可以在实际对接之前通过特征选择推断出哪些评分函数能显著富集活性化合物,并且所选的评分函数是互补的。

相似文献

1
Consensus scoring with feature selection for structure-based virtual screening.基于结构的虚拟筛选中具有特征选择的共识评分
J Chem Inf Model. 2008 Feb;48(2):288-95. doi: 10.1021/ci700239t. Epub 2008 Jan 30.
2
Structure-based virtual screening with supervised consensus scoring: evaluation of pose prediction and enrichment factors.基于结构的虚拟筛选与监督一致性评分:构象预测与富集因子评估
J Chem Inf Model. 2008 Apr;48(4):747-54. doi: 10.1021/ci700464x. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
3
Supervised scoring models with docked ligand conformations for structure-based virtual screening.用于基于结构的虚拟筛选的带有对接配体构象的监督评分模型。
J Chem Inf Model. 2007 Sep-Oct;47(5):1858-67. doi: 10.1021/ci700116z. Epub 2007 Aug 9.
4
Supervised consensus scoring for docking and virtual screening.对接和虚拟筛选的监督一致性评分
J Chem Inf Model. 2007 Mar-Apr;47(2):526-34. doi: 10.1021/ci6004993. Epub 2007 Feb 13.
5
SeleX-CS: a new consensus scoring algorithm for hit discovery and lead optimization.SeleX-CS:一种用于命中发现和先导优化的新型共识评分算法。
J Chem Inf Model. 2009 Mar;49(3):623-33. doi: 10.1021/ci800335j.
6
Scoring ligand similarity in structure-based virtual screening.基于结构的虚拟筛选中配体相似性的评分
J Mol Recognit. 2009 Jul-Aug;22(4):280-92. doi: 10.1002/jmr.942.
7
Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.在多样化测试集上对评分函数的比较评估。
J Chem Inf Model. 2009 Apr;49(4):1079-93. doi: 10.1021/ci9000053.
8
Homology model-based virtual screening for GPCR ligands using docking and target-biased scoring.基于同源性模型,利用对接和靶点偏向性评分进行GPCR配体的虚拟筛选。
J Chem Inf Model. 2008 May;48(5):1104-17. doi: 10.1021/ci8000265. Epub 2008 Apr 26.
9
Evaluation of binary QSAR models derived from LUDI and MOE scoring functions for structure based virtual screening.基于LUDI和MOE评分函数的二元定量构效关系模型在基于结构的虚拟筛选中的评估。
J Chem Inf Model. 2006 Jan-Feb;46(1):39-51. doi: 10.1021/ci050120w.
10
Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking.11种分子对接评分函数的比较评估
J Med Chem. 2003 Jun 5;46(12):2287-303. doi: 10.1021/jm0203783.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the Virtual Screening Ability of Target-Specific Scoring Functions Using Deep Learning Methods.使用深度学习方法提高靶点特异性评分函数的虚拟筛选能力
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Aug 22;10:924. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00924. eCollection 2019.
2
Enhance the performance of current scoring functions with the aid of 3D protein-ligand interaction fingerprints.借助三维蛋白质-配体相互作用指纹图谱提高当前评分函数的性能。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2017 Jul 18;18(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1750-5.
3
Computational methods in drug discovery.药物发现中的计算方法。
Beilstein J Org Chem. 2016 Dec 12;12:2694-2718. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.12.267. eCollection 2016.
4
systemsDock: a web server for network pharmacology-based prediction and analysis.SystemsDock:一个基于网络药理学的预测与分析的网络服务器。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jul 8;44(W1):W507-13. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw335. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
5
vSDC: a method to improve early recognition in virtual screening when limited experimental resources are available.vSDC:一种在实验资源有限时改善虚拟筛选中早期识别的方法。
J Cheminform. 2016 Jan 18;8:1. doi: 10.1186/s13321-016-0112-z. eCollection 2016.
6
Combining machine learning systems and multiple docking simulation packages to improve docking prediction reliability for network pharmacology.结合机器学习系统和多个对接模拟软件包以提高网络药理学对接预测的可靠性。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 31;8(12):e83922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083922. eCollection 2013.
7
Computational methods in drug discovery.药物发现中的计算方法。
Pharmacol Rev. 2013 Dec 31;66(1):334-95. doi: 10.1124/pr.112.007336. Print 2014.
8
Docking challenge: protein sampling and molecular docking performance.对接挑战:蛋白质采样和分子对接性能。
J Chem Inf Model. 2013 Aug 26;53(8):1934-45. doi: 10.1021/ci400040d. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
9
Are predefined decoy sets of ligand poses able to quantify scoring function accuracy?预先定义的配体构象虚拟集能否定量评估打分函数的准确性?
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2012 Feb;26(2):185-97. doi: 10.1007/s10822-011-9539-5. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
10
Cheminformatics meets molecular mechanics: a combined application of knowledge-based pose scoring and physical force field-based hit scoring functions improves the accuracy of structure-based virtual screening. cheminformatics 与分子力学相结合:基于知识的构象评分和基于物理力场的命中评分函数的联合应用提高了基于结构的虚拟筛选的准确性。
J Chem Inf Model. 2012 Jan 23;52(1):16-28. doi: 10.1021/ci2002507. Epub 2011 Dec 14.