Slobbe Laurentius C J, Arah Onyebuchi A, de Bruin Agnes, Westert Gert P
Department of Public Health and Healthcare, National Institute for Public Health and Environment, Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, PO Box 1, 3721 MA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Mar 4;8:52. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-52.
Patterns in time, place and cause of death can have an important impact on calculated hospital mortality rates. Objective is to quantify these patterns following myocardial infarction and stroke admissions in Dutch hospitals during the period 1996-2003, and to compare trends in the commonly used 30-day in-hospital mortality rates with other types of mortality rates which use more extensive follow-up in time and place of death.
Discharge data for all Dutch admissions for index conditions (1996-2003) were linked to the death certification registry. Then, mortality rates within the first 30, 90 and 365 days following admissions were analyzed for deaths occurring within and outside hospitals.
Most deaths within a year after admission occurred within 30 days (60-70%). No significant trends in this distribution of deaths over time were observed. Significant trends in the distribution over place of death were observed for both conditions. For myocardial infarction, the proportion of deaths after transfer to another hospital has doubled from 1996-2003. For stroke a significant rise of the proportion of deaths outside hospital was found. For MI the proportion of deaths attributed to a circulatory disease has significantly fallen overtime. Seven types of hospital mortality indicators, different in scope and observation period, all show a drop of hospital mortality for both MI and stroke over the period 1996-2003. For stroke the observed absolute reduction in death rate increases for the first year after admission, for MI the observed drop in 365-day overall mortality almost equals the observed drop in 30-day in hospital mortality over 1996-2003.
Changes in the timing, place and causes of death following admissions for myocardial infarction and stroke have important implications for the definitions of in-hospital and post-admission mortality rates as measures of hospital performance. Although necessary for understanding mortality patterns over time, including within mortality rates deaths which occur outside hospitals and after longer periods following index admissions remain debatable and may not reflect actual hospital performance but probably mirrors transfer, efficiency, and other health care policies.
死亡的时间、地点和原因模式可能对计算出的医院死亡率产生重要影响。目的是量化1996年至2003年期间荷兰医院心肌梗死和中风入院后的这些模式,并比较常用的30天住院死亡率与其他类型死亡率的趋势,后者在死亡时间和地点上采用了更广泛的随访。
将荷兰所有索引疾病入院(1996 - 2003年)的出院数据与死亡证明登记处相链接。然后,分析入院后前30天、90天和365天内医院内和医院外发生死亡的死亡率。
入院后一年内的大多数死亡发生在30天内(60 - 70%)。未观察到这种死亡分布随时间的显著趋势。两种疾病在死亡地点分布上均观察到显著趋势。对于心肌梗死,转至另一家医院后死亡的比例在1996年至2003年期间增加了一倍。对于中风,发现医院外死亡比例显著上升。对于心肌梗死,归因于循环系统疾病的死亡比例随时间显著下降。七种范围和观察期不同的医院死亡率指标均显示,1996年至2003年期间心肌梗死和中风的医院死亡率均有所下降。对于中风,入院后第一年观察到的死亡率绝对下降幅度增加,对于心肌梗死,1996年至2003年期间观察到的365天总体死亡率下降几乎等于观察到的30天住院死亡率下降。
心肌梗死和中风入院后死亡的时间、地点和原因变化对作为医院绩效衡量指标的住院死亡率和入院后死亡率的定义具有重要意义。尽管对于理解随时间的死亡模式是必要的,但将医院外发生的死亡以及索引入院后较长时间发生的死亡纳入死亡率计算仍存在争议,且可能无法反映实际医院绩效,而可能反映了转诊、效率及其他医疗保健政策。