• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Predicting the use of individualized risk assessment for breast cancer.预测乳腺癌个体化风险评估的应用情况。
Womens Health Issues. 2008 Mar-Apr;18(2):100-9. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2008.01.002.
2
Predictors of mammography screening among ethnically diverse low-income women.不同种族低收入女性乳腺钼靶筛查的预测因素
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008 May;17(4):527-37. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0331.
3
Breast cancer screening among African American women: adherence to current recommendations.非裔美国女性的乳腺癌筛查:对当前建议的依从性
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2005 May;16(2):308-14. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2005.0024.
4
Demographics and perceptions of barriers toward breast cancer screening among Asian-American women.亚裔美国女性的人口统计学特征及对乳腺癌筛查障碍的认知
Women Health. 2008;48(3):261-81. doi: 10.1080/03630240802463384.
5
Comparison between African-American and white women in their beliefs about breast cancer and their health locus of control.非裔美国女性与白人女性在乳腺癌信念及健康控制点方面的比较。
Cancer Nurs. 2000 Aug;23(4):268-76. doi: 10.1097/00002820-200008000-00003.
6
Differences in breast self-examination techniques between Caucasian and African American elderly women.高加索和非裔美国老年女性乳房自我检查技术的差异。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2005 Jul-Aug;14(6):476-84. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2005.14.476.
7
Breast cancer early detection: differences between African American and white women's health beliefs and detection practices.乳腺癌早期检测:非裔美国女性与白人女性健康观念及检测行为的差异
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1995 Jun;22(5):835-7.
8
Addressing social determinants of health to improve access to early breast cancer detection: results of the Boston REACH 2010 Breast and Cervical Cancer Coalition Women's Health Demonstration Project.解决健康的社会决定因素以改善早期乳腺癌检测的可及性:波士顿REACH 2010乳腺癌和宫颈癌联盟妇女健康示范项目的结果
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 May;18(5):677-90. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.0972.
9
Black women and breast health: a review of the literature.黑人女性与乳房健康:文献综述。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2011 Feb;15(1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2010.05.005. Epub 2010 Jun 29.
10
Racial/Ethnic Differences in Cardiovascular Symptoms in Four Major Racial/Ethnic Groups of Midlife Women: A Secondary Analysis.中年女性四大种族/族裔群体心血管症状的种族/族裔差异:一项二次分析
Women Health. 2015;55(5):525-47. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2015.1022813. Epub 2015 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Among Low-Income Women of Color in Primary Care: A Pilot Study.初级保健中低收入有色人种女性的乳腺癌风险评估:一项试点研究。
J Oncol Pract. 2015 Jul;11(4):e460-7. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.003558. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
2
Monitoring style of coping with cancer related threats: a review of the literature.应对癌症相关威胁的监测方式:文献综述
J Behav Med. 2014 Oct;37(5):931-54. doi: 10.1007/s10865-014-9553-x. Epub 2014 Feb 2.
3
A randomized comparison of print and web communication on colorectal cancer screening.一种比较印刷品和网络通讯在结直肠癌筛查中的随机对照研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jan 28;173(2):122-9. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.1017.
4
Individual breast cancer risk assessment in underserved populations: integrating empirical bioethics and health disparities research.弱势群体中个体乳腺癌风险评估:整合实证生物伦理学与健康差异研究
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012 Nov;23(4 Suppl):34-46. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0178.

本文引用的文献

1
A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1.恐惧诉求与态度改变的保护动机理论1。
J Psychol. 1975 Sep;91(1):93-114. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803.
2
Lay Attitudes toward Genetic Testing for Susceptibility to Inherited Diseases.公众对遗传性疾病易感性基因检测的态度。
J Health Psychol. 2001 Jul;6(4):405-23. doi: 10.1177/135910530100600404.
3
Monitoring styles in women at risk for cervical cancer: implications for the framing of health-relevant messages.宫颈癌高危女性的监测方式:对健康相关信息框架的影响
Ann Behav Med. 1999 Spring;21(1):27-34. doi: 10.1007/BF02895030.
4
Consumer information materials for diagnostic breast tests: women's views on information and their understanding of test results.用于乳腺诊断检测的消费者信息材料:女性对信息的看法及其对检测结果的理解
Health Expect. 2003 Dec;6(4):298-311. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-7625.2003.00227.x.
5
Rational choice(s)? Rethinking decision-making on breast cancer risk and screening mammography.理性选择?重新思考乳腺癌风险与乳腺钼靶筛查的决策制定
Nurs Inq. 2003 Dec;10(4):245-56. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1800.2003.00190.x.
6
Messages influencing college women's tanning bed use: statistical versus narrative evidence format and a self-assessment to increase perceived susceptibility.影响大学女生使用晒黑床的信息:统计证据与叙述性证据形式以及提高感知易感性的自我评估
J Health Commun. 2003 Sep-Oct;8(5):443-61. doi: 10.1080/713852118.
7
Some problems with social cognition models: a pragmatic and conceptual analysis.社会认知模型的一些问题:一项务实与概念性分析。
Health Psychol. 2003 Jul;22(4):424-8. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.22.4.424.
8
Assessing interpersonal fusion: reliability and validity of a new DSI fusion with others subscale.评估人际融合:一个新的与他人融合的DSI分量表的信度和效度
J Marital Fam Ther. 2003 Apr;29(2):209-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2003.tb01201.x.
9
A breast cancer education and on-site screening intervention for unscreened African American women.针对未接受筛查的非裔美国女性的乳腺癌教育与现场筛查干预措施。
J Cancer Educ. 2002 Winter;17(4):231-6. doi: 10.1080/08858190209528844.
10
Cancer-related health disparities in women.女性中与癌症相关的健康差异。
Am J Public Health. 2003 Feb;93(2):292-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.2.292.

预测乳腺癌个体化风险评估的应用情况。

Predicting the use of individualized risk assessment for breast cancer.

作者信息

Bartle-Haring Suzanne, Toviessi Paula, Katafiasz Heather

机构信息

Department of Human Development and Family Science, College of Education and Human Ecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.

出版信息

Womens Health Issues. 2008 Mar-Apr;18(2):100-9. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2008.01.002.

DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2008.01.002
PMID:18319147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2276320/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the decision to obtain individualized risk assessment (IRA) after a breast cancer education session.

METHODS

A sample of both African American and Caucasian women was used to determine if there were differences by race/ethnicity in uptake of the assessment and differences in the variables that were most predictive of uptake. The sample included 166 women between the ages of 18 and 80. Sixty-two percent of the sample were African American women.

KEY FINDINGS

The results suggested that African American women and Caucasian women used different factors and used other factors differently to decide whether or not to obtain an IRA.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

These results are discussed within the context of health disparities among ethnic minority and Caucasian women with implications for breast cancer control programs. The results of this study suggest that knowledge alone does not lead to opting for a personalized risk assessment, and that African American and Caucasian women use different pieces of information, or information differently to make decision about getting more personalized information about risk.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查在参加乳腺癌教育课程后获取个性化风险评估(IRA)的决定因素。

方法

采用非裔美国女性和白人女性样本,以确定种族/民族在接受评估方面是否存在差异,以及在最能预测接受情况的变量方面是否存在差异。样本包括166名年龄在18岁至80岁之间的女性。样本中62%为非裔美国女性。

主要发现

结果表明,非裔美国女性和白人女性在决定是否获取IRA时使用不同的因素,且对其他因素的使用方式也不同。

结论与启示

在少数族裔和白人女性健康差异的背景下讨论了这些结果,对乳腺癌控制项目具有启示意义。本研究结果表明,仅靠知识并不能导致选择个性化风险评估,非裔美国女性和白人女性使用不同的信息或不同方式的信息来决定是否获取更多关于风险的个性化信息。