Ozden Cuneyt, Ozdal Ozdem Levent, Aktas Binhan Kagan, Ozelci Alper, Altinova Serkan, Memis Ali
Department of Urology, Numune Education and Research Hospital, Cevizlidere Mah. 14. Cad, Balgat 12/25, 06100 Ankara, Turkey.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2008;40(3):583-6. doi: 10.1007/s11255-008-9355-6. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
The purpose was to evaluate the efficacy of the addition of short-term desmopressin to enuretic alarm in patients with primary monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis (PMNE).
A total of 58 [corrected] children with PMNE were included in this study. The patients were randomized into two groups. In group 1 (n=30), the patients were given 6 weeks of additional oral desmopressin to 12 weeks of enuretic alarm therapy, as a single dose of 0.2 mg at the first 3 weeks and 0.4 mg at the following 3 weeks. In group 2 (n=28), the patients were given 12 weeks of enuretic alarm therapy alone. According to the number of wet nights after 12 weeks of treatment, the patients were defined as complete responders (dry or more than 75% reduction in wet nights), partial responders (50 to 75% reduction) and non-responders (less than 50% reduction). Relapse was defined as the reappearance of >1 wet night per week for complete responders and >50% increase in pre-treatment wetting frequency for partial responders, and all these patients were called relapsers.
The mean number of wet nights after 3 and 6 weeks treatment was significantly lower in group 1 compared to group 2. However, there was no significant difference between the groups regarding the mean number of wet nights after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding the number of responders, partial responders, non-responders and relapsers. In the group with additional desmopressin therapy given, the number of patients who abandoned therapy was lower than the alarm therapy alone group, but it was not statistically significant.
Our data showed that the addition of short-term desmopressin to alarm therapy was more effective only in the period when it was given, and it did not change the response to alarm therapy in the long term.
评估在原发性单纯性夜间遗尿症(PMNE)患者中,短期去氨加压素联合遗尿报警器的疗效。
本研究共纳入58例[校正后]PMNE患儿。将患者随机分为两组。第1组(n = 30)患者在接受12周遗尿报警器治疗的基础上,额外口服6周去氨加压素,前3周单剂量为0.2 mg,后3周为0.4 mg。第2组(n = 28)患者仅接受12周遗尿报警器治疗。根据治疗12周后的尿床夜数,将患者定义为完全缓解者(尿床次数减少至零或减少超过75%)、部分缓解者(减少50%至75%)和无反应者(减少少于50%)。复发定义为完全缓解者每周再次出现>1个尿床夜,部分缓解者治疗前尿床频率增加>50%,所有这些患者均称为复发者。
治疗3周和6周后,第1组的平均尿床夜数显著低于第2组。然而,治疗12周和24周后,两组之间的平均尿床夜数无显著差异。两组在缓解者、部分缓解者、无反应者和复发者的数量上无显著差异。在接受额外去氨加压素治疗的组中,放弃治疗的患者数量低于仅接受报警器治疗的组,但差异无统计学意义。
我们的数据表明,在报警器治疗中添加短期去氨加压素仅在给药期间更有效,从长期来看,它并没有改变对报警器治疗的反应。