Raes An K, De Raedt Rudi, Fias Wim, Koster Ernst H W, Van Damme Stefaan
Faculty of Psychology, Department of Experimental, Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000, Gent, Belgium.
Psychol Res. 2009 Jan;73(1):107-13. doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0141-y. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
Previous research has indicated that conditioning depends on contingency awareness (CA). However, we argue that these studies have examined this issue under methodological conditions that might be insensitive to associative learning without CA. In the present study we examined the effect of an experimental manipulation of CA on attentive processing of classically conditioned stimuli, which is sensitive to associative learning with and without CA. We found that aversive conditioning with additional contingency instructions modulated visual attention, in the sense that the conditioned cues captured and held attention more strongly than the non-conditioned cues. Surprisingly, conditioning under conditions of restricted CA yielded a response pattern that was different from that under full CA. These findings suggest that conditioning with full and restricted CA can lead to qualitatively different effects on attention.
先前的研究表明,条件作用依赖于偶然性意识(CA)。然而,我们认为这些研究是在可能对没有CA的联想学习不敏感的方法学条件下考察这个问题的。在本研究中,我们考察了对CA进行实验操纵对经典条件刺激的注意加工的影响,这种注意加工对有或没有CA的联想学习都敏感。我们发现,带有额外偶然性指示的厌恶条件作用调节了视觉注意,即条件线索比非条件线索更强烈地捕获并保持了注意。令人惊讶的是,在有限CA条件下的条件作用产生了一种与完全CA条件下不同的反应模式。这些发现表明,完全CA和有限CA条件下的条件作用会对注意产生质的不同的影响。