• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[葡萄糖酸氯己定/乙醇免洗外科手消毒与聚维酮碘抗菌效果的评估]

[Evaluation of a waterless, scrubless chlorhexidine gluconate/ethanol surgical scrub and povidone-iodine for antimicrobial efficacy].

作者信息

Choi Jeong Sil

机构信息

Department of Nursing Science, Konyang University, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Korea.

出版信息

Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi. 2008 Feb;38(1):39-44. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2008.38.1.39.

DOI:10.4040/jkan.2008.38.1.39
PMID:18323716
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare 1% chlorhexidine-gluconate/61% ethanol (CHG/Ethanol) emollient and 7.5% povidone-iodine (PVI) scrub for antimicrobial,residual effect, and skin condition.

METHOD

CHG/Ethanol emollient hand hygiene was performed waterless, and brushless by operating doctors and nurses (N=20). PVI hand washing was performed with water and a brush (N=20) for 5 min. The subjects were asked to press their left hand in hand-shaped agar before a surgical scrub, immediately after a surgical scrub and after the operation. The amount of isolated microorganisms were calculated by counting the number of divided areas(1 x 1 cm, 160 cell) which were culture positive in the hand culture plate. The skin condition was evaluated.

RESULT

The antimicrobial count of CHG/Ethanol emollient and PVI immediately post surgical scrub was 0.0 vs. 4.1 (p>.05), and after the operation was 0.1 vs. 37.8 (p>.05)respectively. The Residual effect of CHG/Ethanol emollient immediately post surgical scrub and after the operation were 0.0 vs. 0.1 (p>.05), and PVI were 4.1 vs. 37.8 (p>.05)respectively. The skin condition and satisfaction of CHG/Ethanol emollient was higher than PVI (p<.05).

CONCLUSION

The antimicrobial effect between CHG/Ethanol emollient and PVI were the same. Considering skin condition, satisfaction and allergic reaction CHG/Ethanol emollient for surgical scrub is recommended in Korea.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较1%葡萄糖酸氯己定/61%乙醇(CHG/乙醇)润肤剂和7.5%聚维酮碘(PVI)擦洗剂在抗菌、残留效果及皮肤状况方面的差异。

方法

由20名手术医生和护士采用无水、无刷方式使用CHG/乙醇润肤剂进行手部卫生清洁。20名人员采用用水和刷子的方式进行PVI洗手,持续5分钟。要求受试者在手术擦洗前、手术擦洗后即刻以及手术后将左手按压在手部形状的琼脂上。通过计算手部培养平板上培养呈阳性的分隔区域(1×1厘米,160个细胞)数量来计算分离出的微生物数量。对皮肤状况进行评估。

结果

手术擦洗后即刻,CHG/乙醇润肤剂和PVI的抗菌计数分别为0.0和4.1(p>0.05),手术后分别为0.1和37.8(p>0.05)。手术擦洗后即刻及手术后,CHG/乙醇润肤剂的残留效果分别为0.0和0.1(p>0.05),PVI分别为4.1和37.8(p>0.05)。CHG/乙醇润肤剂的皮肤状况及满意度高于PVI(p<0.05)。

结论

CHG/乙醇润肤剂和PVI的抗菌效果相同。考虑到皮肤状况、满意度及过敏反应,在韩国推荐使用CHG/乙醇润肤剂进行手术擦洗。

相似文献

1
[Evaluation of a waterless, scrubless chlorhexidine gluconate/ethanol surgical scrub and povidone-iodine for antimicrobial efficacy].[葡萄糖酸氯己定/乙醇免洗外科手消毒与聚维酮碘抗菌效果的评估]
Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi. 2008 Feb;38(1):39-44. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2008.38.1.39.
2
Evaluation of a waterless, scrubless chlorhexidine gluconate/ethanol surgical scrub for antimicrobial efficacy.对一种无水、免刷的葡萄糖酸洗必泰/乙醇手术 scrub 进行抗菌效果评估。
Am J Infect Control. 2001 Dec;29(6):377-82. doi: 10.1067/mic.2001.118842.
3
An evaluation of five protocols for surgical handwashing in relation to skin condition and microbial counts.关于皮肤状况和微生物计数对五种外科洗手方案的评估。
J Hosp Infect. 1997 May;36(1):49-65. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(97)90090-6.
4
Methods for evaluating changes in skin condition due to the effects of antimicrobial hand cleansers: two studies comparing a new waterless chlorhexidine gluconate/ethanol-emollient antiseptic preparation with a conventional water-applied product.评估抗菌洗手液作用导致皮肤状况变化的方法:两项将新型无水葡萄糖酸氯己定/乙醇润肤抗菌制剂与传统水性产品进行比较的研究。
Am J Infect Control. 2001 Dec;29(6):361-9. doi: 10.1067/mic.2001.118619.
5
Comparison of the antimicrobial efficacy of povidone-iodine, povidone-iodine-ethanol and chlorhexidine gluconate-ethanol surgical scrubs.聚维酮碘、聚维酮碘 - 乙醇及葡萄糖酸氯己定 - 乙醇外科洗手剂抗菌效果的比较
Dermatology. 2006;212 Suppl 1:21-5. doi: 10.1159/000089195.
6
Antiseptic efficacies of waterless hand rub, chlorhexidine scrub, and povidone-iodine scrub in surgical settings: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.无水手部清洁剂、洗必泰刷手和聚维酮碘刷手在手术环境中的消毒效果:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Hosp Infect. 2019 Apr;101(4):370-379. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.11.012. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
7
Development and evaluation of a new alcohol-based surgical hand scrub formulation with persistent antimicrobial characteristics and brushless application.一种具有持久抗菌特性且无需刷手的新型酒精基外科手消毒制剂的研发与评估。
Am J Infect Control. 1998 Oct;26(5):507-12. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(98)70024-0.
8
Effects of Hand Hygiene Using 4% Chlorhexidine Gluconate or Natural Soap During Hand Rubbing Followed by Alcohol-Based 1% Chlorhexidine Gluconate Sanitizer Lotion in the Operating Room.手术室中手部揉搓后使用 4%葡萄糖酸氯己定或天然皂液,再使用含 1%葡萄糖酸氯己定的酒精基洗手液对手部进行卫生处理的效果。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2022 Jan;11(1):1-9. doi: 10.1089/wound.2020.1352. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
9
Comparison of Aqueous and Alcohol-based Agents for Presurgical Skin Preparation Methods in Mice.小鼠术前皮肤准备方法中水性和酒精性制剂的比较。
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2018 Jul 1;57(4):401-414. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-17-000128. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
10
Antiseptic Effect of Conventional Povidone-Iodine Scrub, Chlorhexidine Scrub, and Waterless Hand Rub in a Surgical Room: A Randomized Controlled Trial.手术室中常规聚维酮碘擦洗、氯己定擦洗和免洗洗手液的抗菌效果:一项随机对照试验
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Apr;38(4):417-422. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.296. Epub 2016 Dec 20.