Smith R N, Andersen R N, Kolenbrander P E
Laboratory of Microbial Ecology, National Institute of Dental Research, Bethesda, Maryland.
J Periodontal Res. 1991 Sep;26(5):422-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1991.tb01732.x.
The potential inhibitory effect of chlorhexidine digluconate on the intergeneric coaggregation of 11 pairs of Gram-positive organisms was compared to its ability to inhibit coaggregations of 14 pairs comprised of both a Gram-positive and a Gram-negative cell type. Dramatic differences in the inhibitory effectiveness of the antimicrobial compound on the two kinds of coaggregation pairs were found. Gram-positive pairs were not inhibited at a concentration of 0.25%, whereas the coaggregations involving a Gram-negative partner were usually completely blocked at concentrations as low as 0.01%. Similar effects to chlorhexidine digluconate were found with octenidine dihydrochloride and cetylpyridinium chloride, while sodium dodecylsulfate was inhibitory only at 10- to 50-fold higher concentrations. These results suggest that chlorhexidine digluconate, octenidine dihydrochloride, and cetylpyridinium chloride may be effective inhibitors of later microbial colonizers of dental plaque but may not disturb a normal healthy indigenous flora.
将葡萄糖酸洗必泰对11对革兰氏阳性菌属间共聚集的潜在抑制作用与其抑制由14对革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌组成的共聚集的能力进行了比较。发现该抗菌化合物对两种共聚集对的抑制效果存在显著差异。革兰氏阳性菌对在0.25%的浓度下未受到抑制,而涉及革兰氏阴性菌伙伴的共聚集通常在低至0.01%的浓度下就被完全阻断。二盐酸奥替尼啶和氯化十六烷基吡啶与葡萄糖酸洗必泰有相似的效果,而十二烷基硫酸钠仅在浓度高10至50倍时才有抑制作用。这些结果表明,葡萄糖酸洗必泰、二盐酸奥替尼啶和氯化十六烷基吡啶可能是牙菌斑后期微生物定植的有效抑制剂,但可能不会干扰正常健康的本土菌群。