• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[When is psychosis dangerous? Ethical, professional en juridical considerations concerning psychosis and coercion in Belgium].

作者信息

Verbrugghe A, Nys H, Vandenberghe J

机构信息

Universitair CGG Leuven, CGG-VBO.

出版信息

Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2008;50(3):149-58.

PMID:18324602
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Belgium a patient can only be compulsorily admitted to a psychiatric hospital if he is a danger to himself or others (law concerning coercion in Belgium, 26/06/1990).

AIM

To explore the relationship between psychosis and danger, and to analyse the various interpretations of the 'dangerousness' criterion in the context of psychotic disorders and the underlying ethical positions.

METHOD

We studied the literature by means of PubMed, PsycINFO, manuals and references and used the search terms: 'coercion', 'commitment of mentally ill', 'dangerous behaviour', and 'psychotic disorders'. results The correlation between psychosis and danger is limited but is strengthened by comorbid substance abuse and non-compliance. The clinical assessment of danger does not have a firm scientific basis. The underlying ethical position determines when danger is regarded as being serious enough to justify coercion.

CONCLUSION

Danger is a problematical criterion for coercion. We propose a model that weighs up the likelihood of danger against the expected pros and contrasts of coercion and the extent to which the disorder can be treated. The fluid nature of the 'dangerousness' criterion and the principle of proportionality call for a more varied arsenal of coercive measures which are less drastic than compulsory admission.

摘要

相似文献

1
[When is psychosis dangerous? Ethical, professional en juridical considerations concerning psychosis and coercion in Belgium].
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2008;50(3):149-58.
2
Pressure and coercion in the care for the addicted: ethical perspectives.对成瘾者护理中的压力与强制:伦理视角
J Med Ethics. 2004 Oct;30(5):453-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2002.002212.
3
Can we justify eliminating coercive measures in psychiatry?我们能否证明在精神病学中消除强制手段是合理的?
J Med Ethics. 2009 Jan;35(1):69-73. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.022780.
4
[Elements of state coercion in health care: selected issues].[医疗保健中的国家强制要素:若干选定问题]
Med Pr. 2011;62(1):67-72.
5
The danger of dangerousness: why we must remove the dangerousness criterion from our mental health acts.危险性的危害:为何我们必须从精神健康法案中删除危险性标准。
J Med Ethics. 2008 Dec;34(12):877-81. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.025098.
6
Patients' and next-of-kins' attitudes towards compulsory psychiatric care.患者及其近亲对强制精神科护理的态度。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2008;62(6):444-9. doi: 10.1080/08039480801984248.
7
[Compulsory hospitalisation of patients suffering from severe drug or alcohol addiction].[对患有严重药物或酒精成瘾的患者进行强制住院治疗]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2013;55(4):269-77.
8
[Discharge of incompetent mentally abnormal criminals: experience from the Austrian central treatment institution].[无行为能力的精神异常罪犯的释放:来自奥地利中央治疗机构的经验]
Psychiatr Prax. 1993 Sep;20(5):181-7.
9
[Between autonomy and coercion: compulsory treatment in psychiatry from an ethical perspective].[介于自主与强制之间:从伦理视角看精神病学中的强制治疗]
Psychiatr Prax. 2014 Jul;41 Suppl 1:S58-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1369906. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
10
Dilemmas related to compulsory admission: a case report.
Psychiatr Danub. 2007 Dec;19(4):303-5.