Knecht G, Morawitz I, Schanda H
Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik Wien, Osterreich.
Psychiatr Prax. 1993 Sep;20(5):181-7.
Based on the data of 66 male patients not guilty for reason of insanity, who were treated in Justizanstalt Göllersdorf, Austria's central institution for mentally ill offenders, we examined the influence of age, duration of detention, diagnosis, and offence on discharge. Law provides a yearly, compulsory examination of the necessity of further inpatient-treatment. We also tried to describe a concept of further dangerousness (considered to be the essential basis for the decision of possible discharge) in a four-factor-model including the criteria psychopathology, insight, conflict behaviour, and social competence. Concerning the various levels of decision finding (institution, expert, court) different interpretations of these criteria could be demonstrated. Independent of diagnostic and prognostic considerations the court stressed mainly kind of offence as the most important factor for the possibility of discharge.
基于在奥地利中央精神病罪犯机构——格勒斯多夫司法精神病院接受治疗的66名因精神错乱而无罪的男性患者的数据,我们研究了年龄、拘留时间、诊断和犯罪对出院的影响。法律规定每年对进一步住院治疗的必要性进行强制检查。我们还试图在一个四因素模型中描述进一步危险性的概念(被认为是决定是否可能出院的基本依据),该模型包括精神病理学、洞察力、冲突行为和社会能力等标准。关于不同的决策层面(机构、专家、法院),可以证明对这些标准存在不同的解释。独立于诊断和预后考虑,法院主要强调犯罪类型是出院可能性的最重要因素。