• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当前的观念能否预测除人格类型之外的轻躁狂症状?轻躁狂态度与积极预测量表(HAPPI)的因素分析及其与学生群体中轻躁狂症状的关联。

Do current beliefs predict hypomanic symptoms beyond personality style? Factor analysis of the hypomanic attitudes and positive predictions inventory (HAPPI) and its association with hypomanic symptoms in a student population.

作者信息

Mansell Warren, Rigby Zoe, Tai Sara, Lowe Christine

机构信息

School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 2008 Apr;64(4):450-65. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20455.

DOI:10.1002/jclp.20455
PMID:18327768
Abstract

A self-report scale called the Hypomanic Attitudes and Positive Predictions Inventory (HAPPI) has been developed to assess cognitions that distinguish between bipolar disorder and nonclinical controls (Mansell, 2006; Mansell & Jones, 2006). We recruited 191 undergraduate students to assess the associations between the HAPPI and self-reported past (MDQ; Hirschfeld et al., 2000) and present (ISS; Bauer et al., 1991) bipolar symptoms, and to explore the factor structure of the scale. The HAPPI correlated with past and present symptoms independently of the BIS/BAS subscales (Carver & White, 1994) and the HPS (Eckblad & Chapman, 1986). Five factors of the HAPPI were identified: success activation and triumph over fear, activating response style, reduced social regulation, loss of control when activated, and catastrophic beliefs about internal states. The HAPPI factors showed specific relationships with current bipolar symptoms that largely fitted with predictions based on the model. Further work is required to establish whether they have a causal role.

摘要

一种名为轻躁狂态度与积极预测量表(HAPPI)的自陈量表已被开发出来,用于评估区分双相情感障碍与非临床对照者的认知(曼塞尔,2006年;曼塞尔和琼斯,2006年)。我们招募了191名本科生,以评估HAPPI与自我报告的过去(MDQ;赫希菲尔德等人,2000年)和当前(ISS;鲍尔等人,1991年)双相情感障碍症状之间的关联,并探索该量表的因子结构。HAPPI与过去和当前症状相关,且独立于BIS/BAS分量表(卡弗和怀特,1994年)以及HPS(埃克布拉德和查普曼,1986年)。确定了HAPPI的五个因子:成功激活与战胜恐惧、激活反应风格、社会调节减少、激活时失去控制以及对内部状态的灾难性信念。HAPPI因子与当前双相情感障碍症状呈现出特定关系,这在很大程度上符合基于该模型的预测。需要进一步开展工作来确定它们是否具有因果作用。

相似文献

1
Do current beliefs predict hypomanic symptoms beyond personality style? Factor analysis of the hypomanic attitudes and positive predictions inventory (HAPPI) and its association with hypomanic symptoms in a student population.当前的观念能否预测除人格类型之外的轻躁狂症状?轻躁狂态度与积极预测量表(HAPPI)的因素分析及其与学生群体中轻躁狂症状的关联。
J Clin Psychol. 2008 Apr;64(4):450-65. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20455.
2
Principal components analysis of the hypomanic attitudes and positive predictions inventory and associations with measures of personality, cognitive style and analogue symptoms in a student sample.在学生样本中,使用轻躁狂态度和积极预测量表进行主成分分析,以及与人格、认知风格和模拟症状测量的关联。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2010 Jan;38(1):15-33. doi: 10.1017/S1352465809990476. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
3
The Brief-HAPPI: a questionnaire to assess cognitions that distinguish between individuals with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder and non-clinical controls.简明HAPPI:一种用于评估区分双相情感障碍患者与非临床对照者认知情况的问卷。
J Affect Disord. 2006 Jul;93(1-3):29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.04.004. Epub 2006 May 12.
4
Dysfunctional beliefs in bipolar disorder: hypomanic vs. depressive attitudes.双相障碍中的功能失调信念:轻躁狂与抑郁态度。
J Affect Disord. 2010 May;122(3):294-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.08.021. Epub 2009 Sep 20.
5
Appraisal of hypomania-relevant experiences: development of a questionnaire to assess positive self-dispositional appraisals in bipolar and behavioural high risk samples.轻躁狂相关经历的评估:开发一份问卷以评估双相情感障碍和行为高风险样本中的积极自我倾向性评估。
J Affect Disord. 2006 Jul;93(1-3):19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.01.017. Epub 2006 Feb 24.
6
Extreme appraisals of internal states and bipolar symptoms: the Hypomanic Attitudes and Positive Predictions Inventory.对内部状态和双相症状的极端评价:轻躁狂态度和积极预测量表。
Psychol Assess. 2011 Sep;23(3):635-645. doi: 10.1037/a0022972.
7
[The validity and reliability of the Brief-Hypomanic Attitudes and Positive Predictions Inventory-Turkish version].[简易轻躁狂态度与积极预测量表土耳其语版的效度与信度]
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2014 Summer;25(2):124-32.
8
The heterogeneous structure of schizotypal personality disorder: item-level factors of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire and their associations with obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms, dissociative tendencies, and normal personality.分裂型人格障碍的异质性结构:分裂型人格问卷的项目水平因素及其与强迫症症状、解离倾向和正常人格的关联
J Abnorm Psychol. 2008 May;117(2):364-76. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.117.2.364.
9
Development and validation of the Affective Self Rating Scale for manic, depressive, and mixed affective states.躁狂、抑郁及混合情感状态的情感自评量表的编制与验证
Nord J Psychiatry. 2008;62(2):130-5. doi: 10.1080/08039480801960354.
10
Multidimensional structure of the Hypomanic Personality Scale.《躁狂人格量表的多维结构》
Psychol Assess. 2011 Jun;23(2):504-22. doi: 10.1037/a0022301.

引用本文的文献

1
Moment-to-moment interaction between affectivity and coping behaviours in bipolar disorder and the role of cognitive appraisals.双相情感障碍中情感与应对行为的即时互动以及认知评估的作用。
BJPsych Open. 2019 May 23;5(3):e44. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2019.35.
2
Differences in beliefs about mood between people with and without bipolar disorder.双相障碍患者与非患者对情绪信念的差异。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2019 Nov;26(6):684-694. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2391. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
3
"When my Moods Drive Upward There Is Nothing I Can Do about It": A Review of Extreme Appraisals of Internal States and the Bipolar Spectrum.
“当我的情绪高涨时,我对此无能为力”:对内部状态的极端评估与双相谱系的综述
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 4;8:1235. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01235. eCollection 2017.
4
Extreme Appraisals of Internal States and Duration of Remission in Remitted Bipolar Patients.缓解期双相情感障碍患者对内部状态的极端评估及缓解持续时间
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2015 Dec;52(4):406-411. doi: 10.5152/npa.2015.7611. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
5
Family influences on mania-relevant cognitions and beliefs: a cognitive model of mania and reward.家庭对与躁狂相关的认知和信念的影响:躁狂和奖励的认知模型。
J Clin Psychol. 2012 Jul;68(7):829-42. doi: 10.1002/jclp.21862. Epub 2012 May 23.
6
The double-edged sword of goal engagement: consequences of goal pursuit in bipolar disorder.双剑合璧:双相障碍中的目标追求的后果。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2012 Jul-Aug;19(4):352-62. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1801. Epub 2012 May 21.
7
The Cognition Checklist for Mania-Revised (CCL-M-R): Factor-Analytic Structure and Links with Risk for Mania, Diagnoses of Mania, and Current Symptoms.修订版躁狂认知检查表(CCL-M-R):因素分析结构及其与躁狂风险、躁狂诊断和当前症状的关联
Int J Cogn Ther. 2009;2(4):313-324. doi: 10.1521/ijct.2009.2.4.313. Epub 2009 Dec 1.
8
Positive overgeneralization and Behavioral Approach System (BAS) sensitivity interact to predict prospective increases in hypomanic symptoms: a behavioral high-risk design.积极的泛化和行为趋近系统(BAS)敏感性相互作用,预测轻躁狂症状的前瞻性增加:一种行为高风险设计。
Behav Res Ther. 2012 Apr;50(4):231-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
9
The behavioral activation system and mania.行为激活系统与躁狂。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2012;8:243-67. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143148. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
10
Cognitive correlates of mania risk: are responses to success, positive moods, and manic symptoms distinct or overlapping?躁狂风险的认知关联:对成功、积极情绪和躁狂症状的反应是不同的还是重叠的?
J Clin Psychol. 2009 Sep;65(9):891-905. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20585.