• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种经皮冠状动脉介入治疗-溶栓预测工具,用于协助在急性心肌梗死的即刻溶栓治疗与延迟的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗之间做出选择。

A percutaneous coronary intervention-thrombolytic predictive instrument to assist choosing between immediate thrombolytic therapy versus delayed primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Kent David M, Ruthazer Robin, Griffith John L, Beshansky Joni R, Concannon Thomas W, Aversano Thomas, Grines Cindy L, Zalenski Robert J, Selker Harry P

机构信息

Center for Cardiovascular Health Services Research, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2008 Mar 15;101(6):790-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.10.050. Epub 2008 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.10.050
PMID:18328842
Abstract

Based on the thrombolytic predictive instrument (TPI), we sought to create electrocardiographically based, real-time decision support to immediate identification of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) likely to benefit from primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with thrombolysis. Using data from the Atlantic Cardiovascular Patient Outcomes Research Team (C-PORT) Trial, we tested a mathematical model predicting mortality in patients with STEMI if treated with PCI and if treated with thrombolytic therapy. We adapted the model for incorporation into computerized electrocardiograms as a PCI-TPI. For patients with STEMI in the C-PORT Trial, the model yielded unbiased mortality predictions: for those receiving thrombolysis, it predicted 6.3% mortality and actual mortality was 6.0% (95% confidence interval 3.0 to 10.6); for those receiving PCI, it predicted 4.5% mortality and actual mortality was 3.9% (95% confidence interval 1.4 to 8.2). Excellent discrimination was reflected by its receiver operating characteristic curve area of 0.86. According to the model, and validated by actual trial outcomes, 1/3 of subjects accounted for all the mortality benefit from PCI. In conclusion, for STEMI, the PCI-TPI accurately predicts mortality for treatment with PCI and with thrombolytic therapy. Incorporated into electrocardiogram, it may assist targeting PCI to those who benefit most and identifying patients before hospitalization for whom a receiving hospital should prepare for PCI.

摘要

基于溶栓预测工具(TPI),我们试图创建一种基于心电图的实时决策支持系统,以便立即识别出与溶栓相比可能从直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中获益的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者。利用来自大西洋心血管患者预后研究团队(C-PORT)试验的数据,我们测试了一个数学模型,该模型可预测STEMI患者接受PCI治疗和溶栓治疗后的死亡率。我们对该模型进行了调整,以便将其纳入计算机化心电图中,作为PCI-TPI。对于C-PORT试验中的STEMI患者,该模型得出了无偏倚的死亡率预测结果:对于接受溶栓治疗的患者,模型预测死亡率为6.3%,实际死亡率为6.0%(95%置信区间为3.0%至10.6%);对于接受PCI治疗的患者,模型预测死亡率为4.5%,实际死亡率为3.9%(95%置信区间为1.4%至8.2%)。其受试者工作特征曲线面积为0.86,反映出该模型具有出色的区分能力。根据该模型,并经实际试验结果验证,三分之一的受试者获得了PCI带来的所有死亡率降低益处。总之,对于STEMI患者,PCI-TPI能够准确预测PCI治疗和溶栓治疗后的死亡率。将其整合到心电图中,可能有助于将PCI治疗靶向至最能获益的患者,并在患者住院前识别出接收医院应为其准备PCI治疗的患者。

相似文献

1
A percutaneous coronary intervention-thrombolytic predictive instrument to assist choosing between immediate thrombolytic therapy versus delayed primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.一种经皮冠状动脉介入治疗-溶栓预测工具,用于协助在急性心肌梗死的即刻溶栓治疗与延迟的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗之间做出选择。
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Mar 15;101(6):790-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.10.050. Epub 2008 Jan 28.
2
Treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in West Pomerania province of Poland. Comparison between primary coronary intervention and thrombolytic therapy.波兰西波美拉尼亚省急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死的治疗。直接冠状动脉介入治疗与溶栓治疗的比较。
Kardiol Pol. 2006 Jun;64(6):591-9; discussion 600-1.
3
Effects of pretreatment with clopidogrel on nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention after fibrinolytic administration for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a Clopidogrel as Adjunctive Reperfusion Therapy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (CLARITY-TIMI) 28 study.氯吡格雷预处理对ST段抬高型心肌梗死溶栓治疗后非急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的影响:氯吡格雷作为辅助再灌注治疗-心肌梗死溶栓(CLARITY-TIMI)28研究。
Am Heart J. 2008 Jan;155(1):133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.08.034. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
4
Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients receiving enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin after fibrinolytic therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the ExTRACT-TIMI 25 trial.在ExTRACT-TIMI 25试验中,接受纤溶治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者在使用依诺肝素或普通肝素后进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jun 12;49(23):2238-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.093. Epub 2007 May 25.
5
Comparison of thrombolysis followed by broad use of percutaneous coronary intervention with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation acute myocardial infarction: data from the french registry on acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (FAST-MI).ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死溶栓后广泛应用经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:来自法国急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死注册研究(FAST-MI)的数据
Circulation. 2008 Jul 15;118(3):268-76. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.762765. Epub 2008 Jun 30.
6
Influence of age on long-term outcome after emergent percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.年龄对ST段抬高型心肌梗死急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后长期预后的影响。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Jun;22(6):273-7.
7
Comparison of the predictive value of four different risk scores for outcomes of patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.四种不同风险评分对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者预后预测价值的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Jul 1;102(1):6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.02.088. Epub 2008 May 28.
8
A geospatial analysis of emergency transport and inter-hospital transfer in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Jan 1;101(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.07.050. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
9
Primary percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention compared with intravenous thrombolysis in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,直接经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术与静脉溶栓治疗的比较。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Apr;90(4):672-8.
10
Relation between electrocardiographic ST-segment resolution and early and late outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后心电图ST段分辨率与早期及晚期预后的关系
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Feb 1;95(3):343-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.09.031.

引用本文的文献

1
Can risk modelling improve treatment decisions in asymptomatic carotid stenosis?无症状性颈动脉狭窄的治疗决策能否通过风险建模得到改善?
BMC Neurol. 2019 Nov 22;19(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1528-7.
2
The use of patient-specific equipoise to support shared decision-making for clinical care and enrollment into clinical trials.利用患者特异性的平衡来支持临床护理中的共同决策以及参与临床试验。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Feb;3(1):27-36. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.380.
3
Risk and treatment effect heterogeneity: re-analysis of individual participant data from 32 large clinical trials.
风险与治疗效果的异质性:对32项大型临床试验个体参与者数据的重新分析。
Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Dec 1;45(6):2075-2088. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw118.
4
Using internally developed risk models to assess heterogeneity in treatment effects in clinical trials.使用内部开发的风险模型评估临床试验中治疗效果的异质性。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Jan;7(1):163-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000497. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
5
Random treatment assignment using mathematical equipoise for comparative effectiveness trials.采用数学均衡随机分组进行比较有效性试验。
Clin Transl Sci. 2011 Feb;4(1):10-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00253.x.
6
Assessing and reporting heterogeneity in treatment effects in clinical trials: a proposal.评估和报告临床试验中治疗效果的异质性:建议。
Trials. 2010 Aug 12;11:85. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-85.
7
Comparative effectiveness of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction regionalization strategies.ST段抬高型心肌梗死区域化策略的比较效果
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Sep;3(5):506-13. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.908541. Epub 2010 Jul 27.