• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对已知患有恶性肿瘤且伴有心包积液患者的电视辅助胸腔镜心包切开术:心包积液细胞学阳性及心包转移的生存情况和预后:一项病例对照研究

VATS pericardiotomy for patients with known malignancy and pericardial effusion: survival and prognosis of positive cytology and metastatic involvement of the pericardium: a case control study.

作者信息

Neragi-Miandoab Siyamek, Linden Philip A, Ducko Christopher T, Bueno Raphael, Richards William G, Sugarbaker David J, Jaklitsch Michael T

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Cardiothoracic Surgery, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA 02118, USA.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2008 Apr;6(2):110-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Jan 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2007.12.005
PMID:18329349
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pericardiotomy for cancer patients with effusion can alleviate symptoms, but with unclear effect on long term survival. Our experience with VATS technique has produced some long-term survivors.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 62 VATS pericardiotomy for pericardial effusion in patients with known malignancy. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Log-Rank tests were used for analysis.

RESULTS

The mean age was 54.8+/-14.3 years (ranging from 19 to 79). The mean hospital stay was 8.7+/-5.5 days. The median survival was 6.75 months (range 1 month-10 years). Overall one-year survival was 44.2%, 3-year survival 17.6%, and 5-year survival 10% after drainage of pericardial effusion. The mean survival in cytology negative patients (n=21) was 13.4+/-0.98 months, compared to 4.89+/-0.9 months in cytology positive patients (n=27) (p=0.0175). The 5-year survival in cytology negative patients was 19.6%, while none of the patients with positive cytology were alive after 36 months. The mean survival in patients with no evidence of metastatic disease on the pericardium (n=28) was 12.8+/-0.9 months, compared to patients with metastatic disease of the pericardium (n=22) 4.66+/-0.8 months (p=0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

VATS Pericardiotomy can provide effective long-term drainage in patients with symptomatic pericardial effusion. Positive cytology and metastatic involvement of the pericardium are predictive of worse survival. Survival greater than 5 years can be expected in 19% and 17% of patients with negative fluid cytology and negative metastatic disease of the pericardium, respectively.

摘要

背景

对伴有积液的癌症患者进行心包切开术可缓解症状,但对长期生存的影响尚不清楚。我们应用电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)技术的经验产生了一些长期存活者。

方法

对62例行VATS心包切开术治疗心包积液且患有已知恶性肿瘤的患者进行回顾性分析。采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线和Log-Rank检验进行分析。

结果

平均年龄为54.8±14.3岁(范围为19至79岁)。平均住院时间为8.7±5.5天。中位生存期为6.75个月(范围为1个月至10年)。心包积液引流后,总体1年生存率为44.2%,3年生存率为17.6%,5年生存率为10%。细胞学检查阴性患者(n=21)的平均生存期为13.4±0.98个月,而细胞学检查阳性患者(n=27)为4.89±0.9个月(p=0.0175)。细胞学检查阴性患者的5年生存率为19.6%,而细胞学检查阳性的患者在36个月后均无存活。心包无转移疾病证据的患者(n=28)的平均生存期为12.8±0.9个月,相比之下,心包有转移疾病的患者(n=22)为4.66±0.8个月(p=0.026)。

结论

VATS心包切开术可为有症状的心包积液患者提供有效的长期引流。细胞学阳性和心包转移受累提示生存较差。心包积液细胞学检查阴性且心包无转移疾病的患者中,分别有19%和17%的患者预期生存期大于5年。

相似文献

1
VATS pericardiotomy for patients with known malignancy and pericardial effusion: survival and prognosis of positive cytology and metastatic involvement of the pericardium: a case control study.针对已知患有恶性肿瘤且伴有心包积液患者的电视辅助胸腔镜心包切开术:心包积液细胞学阳性及心包转移的生存情况和预后:一项病例对照研究
Int J Surg. 2008 Apr;6(2):110-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Jan 9.
2
Primary percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy for malignant pericardial effusion.原发性经皮球囊心包切开术治疗恶性心包积液
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Mar 1;71(4):504-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21431.
3
Abnormal cytology predicts poor prognosis in cancer patients with pericardial effusion.细胞学异常预示着心包积液癌症患者的预后不良。
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 1;23(22):5211-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.00.745.
4
Severe pericardial effusion in patients with concurrent malignancy: a retrospective analysis of prognostic factors influencing survival.合并恶性肿瘤患者的严重心包积液:影响生存的预后因素的回顾性分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Nov;15(11):3268-71. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0059-z. Epub 2008 Jul 22.
5
Surgical management of symptomatic pericardial effusion in patients with solid malignancies.实体恶性肿瘤患者有症状心包积液的外科治疗
Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Dec;13(12):1732-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9073-1. Epub 2006 Oct 7.
6
Pericardiectomy in dogs: 22 cases (1978-1994).犬心包切除术:22例(1978 - 1994年)
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1997 Sep 15;211(6):736-40.
7
Long-Term Outcomes after Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Pericardiectomy for Pericardial Effusion.电视辅助胸腔镜下心包切除术治疗心包积液的长期预后
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Dec 20;23(6):304-308. doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.17-00046. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
8
Retrospective comparison of outcomes, diagnostic value, and complications of percutaneous prolonged drainage versus surgical pericardiotomy of pericardial effusion associated with malignancy.回顾性比较恶性肿瘤相关性心包积液行经皮持续引流与外科心包切开术的疗效、诊断价值和并发症。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 15;112(8):1235-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.05.066. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
9
Effects of posterior pericardiotomy on the incidence of pericardial effusion and atrial fibrillation after coronary revascularization.心包后切开术对冠状动脉血运重建术后心包积液和心房颤动发生率的影响。
Med Sci Monit. 2006 Oct;12(10):CR431-4. Epub 2006 Sep 25.
10
Laparoscopic pericardio-peritoneal window: an alternative approach in the treatment of recurrent pericardial effusion, in-hospital evolution and survival.腹腔镜下心包-腹膜开窗术:治疗复发性心包积液的一种替代方法、院内病情进展及生存率
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007 Apr;17(2):116-9. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318030b0d9.

引用本文的文献

1
Pericardial Window Operation in Oncology Patients: Analysis of Long-Term Survival and Prognostic Factors.肿瘤患者的心包开窗手术:长期生存及预后因素分析
J Chest Surg. 2024 Mar 5;57(2):169-177. doi: 10.5090/jcs.23.113. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
2
Cardiac Tamponade in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.乳腺癌患者的心脏压塞:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2022 Dec 30;14(12):e33123. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33123. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Life-Threatening Cardiac Tamponade Secondary to COVID-19 Treated with Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Case Report.
COVID-19 所致危及生命的心包填塞采用单孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗:病例报告。
Am J Case Rep. 2022 Apr 9;23:e935839. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.935839.
4
The Value of Cytology in the Evaluation of Malignant Pericardial Effusions: A Systematic Review.细胞学检查在恶性心包积液评估中的价值:一项系统评价
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 1;12(2):367. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020367.
5
Long-Term Outcomes after Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Pericardiectomy for Pericardial Effusion.电视辅助胸腔镜下心包切除术治疗心包积液的长期预后
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Dec 20;23(6):304-308. doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.17-00046. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
6
Comparison of acute phase reaction and postoperative stress in pigs undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic versus thoracotomy pneumonectomy.电视辅助胸腔镜手术与开胸肺叶切除术猪的急性期反应和术后应激比较
Acta Vet Scand. 2016 Nov 9;58(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13028-016-0256-x.
7
Management of Malignant Pericardial Effusion.恶性心包积液的管理
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2014 Jul-Aug;5(4):281-9.