Cheraghi-Sohi Sudeh, Hole Arne Risa, Mead Nicola, McDonald Ruth, Whalley Diane, Bower Peter, Roland Martin
National Primary Care Research and Development Centre (NPCRDC), University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Ann Fam Med. 2008 Mar-Apr;6(2):107-15. doi: 10.1370/afm.816.
The consultation is fundamental to the delivery of primary care, but different ways of organizing consultations may lead to different patient experiences in terms of access, continuity, technical quality of care, and communication. Patients' priorities for these different issues need to be understood, but the optimal methods for assessing priorities are unclear. This study used a discrete choice experiment to assess patients' priorities.
We surveyed patients from 6 family practices in England. The patients chose between primary care consultations differing in attributes such as ease of access (wait for an appointment), choice (flexibility of appointment times), continuity (physician's knowledge of the patient), technical quality (thoroughness of physical examination), and multiple aspects of patient-centered care (interest in patient's ideas, inquiry about patient's social and emotional well-being, and involvement of patient in decision making). We used probit models to assess the relative priority patients placed on different attributes and to estimate how much they were willing to pay for them.
Analyses were based on responses from 1,193 patients (a 53% response rate). Overall, patients were willing to pay the most for a thorough physical examination ($40.87). The next most valued attributes of care were seeing a physician who knew them well ($12.18), seeing a physician with a friendly manner ($8.50), having a reduction in waiting time of 1 day ($7.22), and having flexibility of appointment times ($6.71). Patients placed similar value on the different aspects of patient-centered care ($12.06-$14.82). Responses were influenced by the scenario in which the decision was made (minor physical problem vs urgent physical problem vs ambiguous physical or psychological problem) and by patients' demographic characteristics.
Although patient-centered care is important to patients, they may place higher priority on the technical quality of care and continuity of care. Discrete choice experiments may be a useful method for assessing patients' priorities in health care.
会诊是初级医疗服务的基础,但不同的会诊组织方式可能会在就诊机会、连续性、医疗技术质量和沟通等方面给患者带来不同的体验。需要了解患者对这些不同问题的优先考虑事项,但评估优先事项的最佳方法尚不清楚。本研究采用离散选择实验来评估患者的优先事项。
我们对来自英格兰6家家庭诊所的患者进行了调查。患者在不同属性的初级医疗会诊之间进行选择,这些属性包括就诊便利性(等待预约的时间)、选择度(预约时间的灵活性)、连续性(医生对患者的了解程度)、技术质量(体格检查的彻底性)以及以患者为中心的医疗服务的多个方面(对患者想法的关注、对患者社会和情感福祉的询问以及患者参与决策)。我们使用概率模型来评估患者对不同属性的相对优先考虑程度,并估计他们愿意为这些属性支付的费用。
分析基于1193名患者的回复(回复率为53%)。总体而言,患者愿意为全面的体格检查支付最高费用(40.87美元)。其次最受重视的医疗属性是看熟悉他们的医生(12.18美元)、看态度友好的医生(8.50美元)、等待时间减少1天(7.22美元)以及预约时间的灵活性(6.71美元)。患者对以患者为中心的医疗服务的不同方面给予了相似的重视程度(12.06 - 14.82美元)。回复受到做出决策的场景(轻微身体问题、紧急身体问题、不明确的身体或心理问题)以及患者人口统计学特征的影响。
虽然以患者为中心的医疗服务对患者很重要,但他们可能会更优先考虑医疗技术质量和医疗连续性。离散选择实验可能是评估患者在医疗保健方面优先事项的一种有用方法。