Popescu Mihai, Popescu Elena-Anda, Chan Tszping, Blunt Shannon D, Lewine Jeffrey D
Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology and the Hoglund Brain Imaging Center, The University of Kansas Medical Center, 2021West 38th Avenue, Kansas City, KS 66160-7401 USA.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008 Mar;55(3):1092-102. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2007.906504.
A rapidly growing number of neuromagnetic studies focus on the analysis of auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) in relation to a diverse array of factors including age, selective attention, and presence of psychopathology. The objectives of these studies require accurate spatio-temporal estimation of the underlying neural generators, a challenging task due to the relatively low signal strength and high correlation between bilateral auditory cortical sources. This paper evaluates the performance of two beamforming schemes that can potentially overcome such difficulties: 1) the linearly constrained minimum variance beamformer with partial sensor coverage (LCMV-PSC), and 2) the multiple constrained minimum-variance beamformer with coherent source region suppression (MCMV-CSRS). Simulation experiments are conducted to assess the impact of source parameters on the reconstruction accuracy. The results indicate that the LCMV-PSC method is prone to localization errors that essentially occur along medio-lateral directions, increase with source depth, and are associated to amplitude and phase distortions of the estimated time courses of activity. Comparatively, the MCMV-CSRS method exhibits precise localization and minimal amplitude and phase distortion for a broad range of relative interferer's positions within the suppression region. The results from the numerical experiments are validated on real magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data collected from a 40-Hz ASSR paradigm.
越来越多的神经磁学研究聚焦于分析听觉稳态反应(ASSR)与包括年龄、选择性注意力和精神病理学存在等多种因素的关系。这些研究的目标需要对潜在神经发生器进行准确的时空估计,由于信号强度相对较低以及双侧听觉皮层源之间的高相关性,这是一项具有挑战性的任务。本文评估了两种可能克服此类困难的波束形成方案的性能:1)具有部分传感器覆盖的线性约束最小方差波束形成器(LCMV-PSC),以及2)具有相干源区域抑制的多约束最小方差波束形成器(MCMV-CSRS)。进行了模拟实验以评估源参数对重建精度的影响。结果表明,LCMV-PSC方法容易出现定位误差,这些误差主要沿中侧方向出现,随源深度增加,并且与估计活动时间进程的幅度和相位失真有关。相比之下,对于抑制区域内广泛的相对干扰源位置,MCMV-CSRS方法表现出精确的定位以及最小的幅度和相位失真。数值实验的结果在从40赫兹ASSR范式收集的真实脑磁图(MEG)数据上得到了验证。