Yuan Shi-Min, Mishaly David, Shinfeld Amihay, Raanani Ehud
Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2008 Apr;9(4):327-37. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e32821626ce.
The valved conduit of choice in right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) reconstruction provides a challenge for cardiac surgeons. The present study collected data regarding the clinical outcome of valved conduits for RVOT reconstruction, so as to explore various options of ideal conduits in clinical practice.
English language articles on valved conduits for RVOT reconstruction were retrieved from the MEDLINE database with respect to the commonly used homograft, stented xenograft and stentless xenograft, and the occasionally used autologous tissue valved conduit as well. Clinical outcomes of each conduit were outlined with respect to their early and late mortalities, conduit failure, conduit reoperation, reoperation-free interval, actuarial freedom from reoperation, and survival rates. Conduit-related complications, risk factors and pathological findings of the valved conduits were summarized.
Conduit failure was defined as the need for reoperation for conduit stenosis or extrinsic compression, conduit regurgitation, or anastomotic dehiscence. The conduit failure rates at 2 years were 9-55%, 35% and 25% for homograft, stented xenograft and stentless xenograft conduits, respectively. The 5-year actuarial freedoms from reoperation were 87-98.2% for homograft, 37% for Hancock, 81-92% for Carpentier-Edwards, 78% for Contegra, and 82.95% for LabCor, respectively. The result for Hancock at 5 years appeared to be disappointing, although it did prove promising, and was 79.5% at 10 years and 65.8% at 15 years. Autologous pericardial valved conduits for RVOT reconstruction showed superb properties, and the autologous monocusp pulmonary artery conduit functioned well early postoperatively, but data for long-term follow-up are lacking.
Conduit failure and explant is inevitable. This phenomenon is worse with a longer follow-up. Mechanisms involved in conduit failure are unknown, even though they were accounted for by calcification and extensive intimal proliferation, and somatic outgrowth. Homografts are commonly used and have experienced a long history. The pulmonary homograft is the most commonly used RVOT conduit, especially in small children, due to its excellent characteristics. The newly-developed Contegra conduit has become popular due to its availability in full sizes and the acceptable results obtained at intermediate follow-up. The Hancock conduit can function sufficiently well for as long as 5-10 years, and early valve failure is relatively rare. It is admissible to use the Hancock conduit as an interim measure for future conduit reoperation due to its adequate function until subsequent operation. The application of an autologeous tissue valved conduit should be considered when other alternatives are not available.
右心室流出道(RVOT)重建中选用的带瓣管道给心脏外科医生带来了挑战。本研究收集了关于RVOT重建带瓣管道临床结果的数据,以探索临床实践中理想管道的各种选择。
从MEDLINE数据库检索关于RVOT重建带瓣管道的英文文章,涉及常用的同种异体移植物、带支架异种移植物和无支架异种移植物,以及偶尔使用的自体组织带瓣管道。概述了每种管道的临床结果,包括早期和晚期死亡率、管道失败、管道再次手术、无再次手术间隔、再次手术的精算自由度和生存率。总结了带瓣管道的相关并发症、危险因素和病理结果。
管道失败定义为因管道狭窄或外部压迫、管道反流或吻合口裂开而需要再次手术。同种异体移植物、带支架异种移植物和无支架异种移植物管道在2年时的管道失败率分别为9% - 55%、35%和25%。同种异体移植物5年再次手术的精算自由度为87% - 98.2%,Hancock为37%,Carpentier - Edwards为81% - 92%,Contegra为78%,LabCor为82.95%。Hancock在5年时的结果似乎令人失望,尽管它确实曾显示出前景,10年时为79.5%,15年时为65.8%。用于RVOT重建的自体心包带瓣管道表现出优异的性能,自体单叶肺动脉管道术后早期功能良好,但缺乏长期随访数据。
管道失败和取出是不可避免的。这种现象在更长的随访期更严重。尽管管道失败的机制被认为是钙化、广泛的内膜增生和体细胞生长,但具体机制尚不清楚。同种异体移植物使用普遍且历史悠久。肺同种异体移植物是最常用的RVOT管道,尤其是在小儿患者中,因其优异的特性。新开发的Contegra管道因其全尺寸可用以及中期随访获得的可接受结果而受到欢迎。Hancock管道可以充分发挥功能长达5至10年,早期瓣膜失败相对少见。由于其功能足够直到后续手术,因此可将Hancock管道用作未来管道再次手术的临时措施。当没有其他选择时,应考虑应用自体组织带瓣管道。