• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Community learning disability teams: developments, composition and good practice: a review of the literature.

作者信息

Slevin Eamonn, Truesdale-Kennedy Maria, McConkey Roy, Barr Owen, Taggart Laurence

机构信息

Institute of Nursing Research, University of Ulster, Northern Ireland, UK.

出版信息

J Intellect Disabil. 2008 Mar;12(1):59-79. doi: 10.1177/1744629507083583.

DOI:10.1177/1744629507083583
PMID:18337302
Abstract

This article presents the findings from a literature review related to community learning disability teams (CLDTs). Much of the existing literature on CLDTs is inspirational, theoretical or opinion based rather than evidence based. It was considered that current knowledge is insufficient to allow a systematic review; therefore a structured review of factors that impact on CLDTs was undertaken following some of the principles of a systematic review. The review covers historical and philosophical influences on the development of CLDTs; the structure and common composition of CLDTs; the main challenges facing CLDTs; and the barriers that impact on their effective working. Based on the available evidence a number of good practice suggestions are forwarded that have the potential to enhance the work undertaken by CLDTs, but it is acknowledged that there is a need for more research into the effectiveness of these teams.

摘要

相似文献

1
Community learning disability teams: developments, composition and good practice: a review of the literature.
J Intellect Disabil. 2008 Mar;12(1):59-79. doi: 10.1177/1744629507083583.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
5
Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.卫生技术评估中决策分析模型良好实践指南综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. doi: 10.3310/hta8360.
6
Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability.针对智障父母的家长培训干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 13;7(7):CD007987. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007987.pub3.
7
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
8
Is speech and language therapy effective at improving the communication of adults with intellectual disabilities?: A systematic review.言语和语言治疗对改善智障成年人的沟通能力是否有效?:一项系统综述。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 Mar;56(2):435-450. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12601. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
9
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
10
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors supporting optimisation of psychotropic deprescribing in people with intellectual disabilities within the UK: a modified Delphi study.支持英国智力残疾者精神药物减药优化的因素:一项改良德尔菲研究
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 19;16:1652988. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1652988. eCollection 2025.
2
Organising healthcare services for persons with an intellectual disability.为智障人士组织医疗保健服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 11;4(4):CD007492. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007492.pub2.