Standl T, Lochbuehler H, Galli C, Reich A, Dietrich G, Hagemann H
Academic Hospital Solingen, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Solingen, Hannover, Germany.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008 Jun;25(6):437-45. doi: 10.1017/S0265021508003888. Epub 2008 Mar 13.
For perioperative volume therapy in infants and young children, human albumin has frequently been the colloid of choice. Recently, HES 130/0.4 (6% hydroxyethyl starch, Voluven; Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany) was developed, which demonstrated improved pharmacokinetics and a favourable safety profile in adults compared with hydroxyethyl starch products with a less rapid metabolization.
Our prospective, controlled, randomized, open, multicentre pilot study was designed to obtain data on the effects of HES 130/0.4 compared with human albumin 5% with regard to haemodynamics in children <2 yr scheduled for elective non-cardiac surgery.
A total of 81 patients were treated. Comparable amounts of both study solutions (16.0 mL kg(-1) hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 vs. 16.9 mL kg(-1) human albumin 5%) as well as add-on crystalloids were used until 4-6 h postoperatively. No differences were detected between the two treatment groups regarding perioperative stabilization of haemodynamics, coagulation parameters, blood gas analyses or other laboratory values. Blood loss was 96 +/-143 mL for hydroxyethyl starch and 145+/- 290 mL for human albumin (P > 0.05). There were no relevant differences in the amount of red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma or platelet concentrates in both treatment groups. Median length of ICU stay was 3.5 days (range 1-57 days, mean +/- SD 7.6 +/- 11.5 days) in the hydroxyethyl starch group and 6.0 days (range 1-71 days; mean +/- SD 9.1 +/- 14.2 days) in the human albumin group. There was no difference for hospital stay (median: 12 days for both groups).
Both HES 130/0.4 and human albumin 5% were effective for haemodynamic stabilization in non-cardiac surgery of young infants with no adverse impact on coagulation or other safety parameters in our study population.
对于婴幼儿围手术期的容量治疗,人血白蛋白一直是常用的胶体溶液。最近,研发出了HES 130/0.4(6%羟乙基淀粉,万汶;费森尤斯卡比公司,德国巴特洪堡),与代谢较慢的羟乙基淀粉产品相比,其在成人中展现出了更好的药代动力学特性和良好的安全性。
我们开展了一项前瞻性、对照、随机、开放、多中心的试点研究,旨在获取有关HES 130/0.4与5%人血白蛋白相比,对计划接受择期非心脏手术的2岁以下儿童血流动力学影响的数据。
共治疗了81例患者。术后4 - 6小时内,两种研究溶液的使用量相当(16.0 mL/kg羟乙基淀粉130/0.4对比16.9 mL/kg 5%人血白蛋白),且晶体液补充量也相当。在围手术期血流动力学稳定、凝血参数、血气分析或其他实验室值方面,两个治疗组之间未检测到差异。羟乙基淀粉组的失血量为96±143 mL,人血白蛋白组为145±290 mL(P>0.05)。两个治疗组在红细胞、新鲜冰冻血浆或血小板浓缩物的使用量上没有显著差异。羟乙基淀粉组ICU住院时间中位数为3.5天(范围1 - 57天,平均±标准差7.6±11.5天),人血白蛋白组为6.0天(范围1 - 71天;平均±标准差9.1±14.2天)。住院时间无差异(中位数:两组均为12天)。
在我们的研究人群中,HES 130/0.4和5%人血白蛋白在婴幼儿非心脏手术中对血流动力学稳定均有效,且对凝血或其他安全参数无不良影响。