Suppr超能文献

白蛋白与羟乙基淀粉用于心脏手术后患者的血流动力学比较

Hemodynamic comparison of albumin and hydroxyethyl starch in postoperative cardiac surgery patients.

作者信息

Moggio R A, Rha C C, Somberg E D, Praeger P I, Pooley R W, Reed G E

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1983 Dec;11(12):943-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198312000-00009.

Abstract

The hemodynamic effects of 2 plasma volume expanders were compared in postoperative open heart surgery patients. Albumin 5% (A) or hydroxyethyl starch 6% (HES) solutions were infused according to indications based on cardiac index (CI) and pulmonary wedge pressure (WP), and their effects evaluated by physiologic profile measurements. Both groups demonstrated significant increases with volume infusion in CI (A from 2.37 to 2.84; HES from 1.97 to 2.49 L/min X m2) and WP (A from 9.4 to 13.7 mm Hg; HES from 11.9 to 13.2 mm Hg). Stroke index and stroke work increased similarly. Mean systemic arterial pressure (MAP) and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP) remained unchanged. No significant difference for any variable was demonstrated between the A and HES groups. In the volume used, from 250 to 750 ml, HES caused no bleeding abnormalities. HES is as effective as A as a plasma volume expander in postoperative cardiac surgery patients.

摘要

在心脏直视手术术后患者中比较了两种血浆容量扩充剂的血流动力学效应。根据心脏指数(CI)和肺楔压(WP)的指征,输注5%白蛋白(A)溶液或6%羟乙基淀粉(HES)溶液,并通过生理指标测量评估其效果。两组患者在输注液体后CI(A组从2.37升至2.84;HES组从1.97升至2.49 L/min×m²)和WP(A组从9.4升至13.7 mmHg;HES组从11.9升至13.2 mmHg)均显著升高。每搏指数和每搏功也有类似升高。平均体动脉压(MAP)和平均肺动脉压(MPAP)保持不变。A组和HES组之间在任何变量上均未显示出显著差异。在所使用的250至750 ml容量范围内,HES未引起出血异常。在心脏手术术后患者中,HES作为血浆容量扩充剂与A一样有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验