Cockburn J, Hill D, Irwig L, De Luise T, Turnbull D, Schofield P
Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Anti-Cancer Council of Victoria, Carlton Sth, Australia.
Eur J Cancer. 1991;27(7):827-31. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(91)90126-x.
A reliable and valid questionnaire has been developed to measure the satisfaction of participants with service offered at mammography screening programmes. The questionnaire measures five specific aspects: convenience and accessibility, staffs' interpersonal skills, information transfer between staff and client, physical surroundings and perceived technical competence of staff. A general satisfaction dimension was also included. Systematic procedures were followed to ensure that the initial pool of items met the criteria for satisfactory content validity. These procedures included extensive literature review and interviews with participants and service providers. Discriminant validity was assessed by a modified Q-sort procedure, where eight expert judges sorted items into relevant dimensions. The sample for other validity and reliability testing consisted of 584 women who were participants at a breast X-ray programme in Melbourne, Australia. Concurrent validity was demonstrated by considering the correlation of the sum of the subscale scores for each respondent with their score on the general subscale (r = 0.76; P less than 0.001). Multiple regression was used to provide further evidence for the discriminant validity of the proposed subscales and support for the multidimensional conceptualism of satisfaction. Scores on the general satisfaction subscale were used as an outcome variable and other subscale scores were predictor variables. All subscale scores significantly contributed to the prediction of satisfaction, over and above that of other subscales (R2 = 0.59). This indicates that these subscales are measuring distinct dimensions of satisfaction. Cronbach's alpha of each subscale was over 0.50, indicating that the subscales are reliable. The instrument is a potentially useful tool for assessing the quality of care at mammographic screening services and could be used routinely by such services to monitor satisfaction.
已经开发出一种可靠且有效的问卷,用于衡量参与者对乳房X光检查筛查项目所提供服务的满意度。该问卷测量五个具体方面:便利性和可及性、工作人员的人际沟通技巧、工作人员与客户之间的信息传递、物理环境以及对工作人员技术能力的感知。还纳入了一个总体满意度维度。遵循系统程序以确保初始项目池符合令人满意的内容效度标准。这些程序包括广泛的文献综述以及对参与者和服务提供者的访谈。通过改良的Q分类程序评估区分效度,八名专家评委将项目分类到相关维度。用于其他效度和信度测试的样本包括584名澳大利亚墨尔本乳房X光检查项目的女性参与者。通过考虑每个受访者的子量表分数总和与其在总体子量表上的分数之间的相关性来证明同时效度(r = 0.76;P小于0.001)。多元回归用于为所提议子量表的区分效度提供进一步证据,并支持满意度的多维概念。总体满意度子量表的分数用作结果变量,其他子量表分数用作预测变量。所有子量表分数对满意度预测的贡献均显著高于其他子量表(R2 = 0.59)。这表明这些子量表正在测量满意度的不同维度。每个子量表的克朗巴哈系数均超过0.50,表明子量表是可靠的。该工具是评估乳房X光检查筛查服务护理质量的潜在有用工具,此类服务可常规使用它来监测满意度。