Suppr超能文献

向非统计专业人员教授验证性因素分析:一个用于估计心理测量工具组合信度的案例研究。

Teaching Confirmatory Factor Analysis to Non-Statisticians: A Case Study for Estimating Composite Reliability of Psychometric Instruments.

作者信息

Gajewski Byron J, Jiang Yu, Yeh Hung-Wen, Engelman Kimberly, Teel Cynthia, Choi Won S, Greiner K Allen, Daley Christine Makosky

机构信息

University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS 66160 USA.

出版信息

Case Studies Bus Ind Gov Stat. 2014 Jan;5(2):88-101.

Abstract

Texts and software that we are currently using for teaching multivariate analysis to non-statisticians lack in the delivery of factor analysis (CFA). The purpose of this paper is to provide educators with a complement to these resources that includes CFA its computation. We focus on how to use CFA to estimate a "composite reliability" of a psychometric instrument. This paper provides guidance for introducing, via a case-study, the non-statistician to CFA. As a complement to our instruction about the more traditional SPSS, we successfully piloted the software R for estimating CFA on nine non-statisticians. This approach can be used with healthcare graduate students taking a multivariate course, as well as modified for community stakeholders of our Center for American Indian Community Health (e.g. community advisory boards, summer interns, & research team members). The placement of CFA at the end of the class is strategic and gives us an opportunity to do some innovative teaching: (1) build ideas for understanding the case study using previous course work (such as ANOVA); (2) incorporate multi-dimensional scaling (that students already learned) into the selection of a factor structure (new concept); (3) use interactive data from the students (active learning); (4) review matrix algebra and its importance to psychometric evaluation; (5) show students how to do the calculation on their own; and (6) give students access to an actual recent research project.

摘要

我们目前用于向非统计专业人员教授多元分析的文本和软件,在讲授验证性因素分析(CFA)方面存在不足。本文的目的是为教育工作者提供这些资源的补充内容,包括CFA及其计算方法。我们重点关注如何使用CFA来估计心理测量工具的“组合信度”。本文通过一个案例研究,为向非统计专业人员介绍CFA提供指导。作为对我们关于更传统的SPSS教学的补充,我们成功地在九名非统计专业人员身上试用了用于估计CFA的软件R。这种方法可用于修读多元课程的医疗保健专业研究生,也可针对我们美国印第安社区健康中心的社区利益相关者(如社区咨询委员会、暑期实习生和研究团队成员)进行调整。将CFA安排在课程结尾是经过深思熟虑的,这使我们有机会进行一些创新教学:(1)利用之前的课程作业(如方差分析)来构建理解案例研究的思路;(2)将学生已经学过的多维尺度分析纳入因素结构的选择(新概念);(3)使用学生的交互式数据(主动学习);(4)复习矩阵代数及其对心理测量评估的重要性;(5)向学生展示如何自己进行计算;(6)让学生接触到一个实际的近期研究项目。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e9f/3996839/1339262b9c03/nihms419622f1.jpg

相似文献

4

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验