• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

艾滋病病毒(HIV)性风险行为回顾性评估的可靠性:双周、三个月及十二个月自我报告的比较

Reliability of retrospective assessments of sexual HIV risk behavior: a comparison of biweekly, three-month, and twelve-month self-reports.

作者信息

Kauth M R, St Lawrence J S, Kelly J A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Mississippi.

出版信息

AIDS Educ Prev. 1991 Fall;3(3):207-14.

PMID:1834142
Abstract

A review of 30 AIDS behavioral research studies revealed that almost half employed retrospective sexual activity assessment periods of 12 months or longer. The present study examined the correspondence between retrospective reports of sexual activity for 3 overlapping time-frames (past 2 weeks, past 3 months, and past 12 months) for 61 gay men. Adjusted for equivalent 12-month intervals, the reported mean frequencies of sexual practices were considerably higher for shorter recall periods than for longer recall periods, a discrepancy greater than would be expected by normal activity fluctuation. The study also found that behavior reported across shorter retrospective time-frames was more consistent, while reliability for frequently occurring and unsafe sexual activities decreased as the recall period lengthened. Studies utilizing recall periods of 12 months or more may produce data of questionable reliability.

摘要

一项对30项艾滋病行为研究的综述显示,几乎一半的研究采用了12个月或更长时间的回顾性性活动评估期。本研究调查了61名男同性恋者在3个重叠时间框架(过去2周、过去3个月和过去12个月)内性活动回顾报告之间的一致性。经调整为等效的12个月间隔后,较短回忆期报告的性行为平均频率比较长回忆期高得多,这种差异大于正常活动波动预期的差异。该研究还发现,在较短回顾性时间框架内报告的行为更一致,而随着回忆期延长,频繁发生的不安全性行为的可靠性降低。使用12个月或更长时间回忆期的研究可能会产生可靠性存疑的数据。

相似文献

1
Reliability of retrospective assessments of sexual HIV risk behavior: a comparison of biweekly, three-month, and twelve-month self-reports.艾滋病病毒(HIV)性风险行为回顾性评估的可靠性:双周、三个月及十二个月自我报告的比较
AIDS Educ Prev. 1991 Fall;3(3):207-14.
2
Effects of question format and collection mode on the accuracy of retrospective surveys of health risk behavior: a comparison with daily sexual activity diaries.问题形式和收集方式对健康风险行为回顾性调查准确性的影响:与日常性活动日记的比较
Health Psychol. 2007 Jan;26(1):60-7. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.1.60.
3
Factors associated with sexual problems in HIV-positive gay men.与HIV阳性男同性恋者性问题相关的因素。
Int J STD AIDS. 2004 Nov;15(11):732-6. doi: 10.1258/0956462042395221.
4
Reliability of self-reported sexual behavior risk factors for HIV infection in homosexual men.男同性恋者中自我报告的HIV感染性行为风险因素的可靠性。
Public Health Rep. 1987 Nov-Dec;102(6):692-7.
5
Sexual practices and condom usage in a cohort of homosexual men in relation to human immunodeficiency virus status.一组同性恋男性的性行为及避孕套使用情况与人类免疫缺陷病毒感染状况的关系。
Med J Aust. 1989 Sep 18;151(6):318-22.
6
Awareness of sexual partners' HIV status as an influence upon high-risk sexual behaviour among gay men.知晓性伴侣的艾滋病毒感染状况对男同性恋者高危性行为的影响。
AIDS. 1994 Jun;8(6):837-41.
7
[High-risk sex behavior and HIV prevalence among gay and bisexual men in the community of Madrid].[马德里社区男同性恋者和双性恋男性中的高危性行为及艾滋病毒流行情况]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2000 Jan-Feb;74(1):25-32.
8
The evaluation of surveys of sexual behaviour: a study of couples in rural Senegal.性行为调查评估:塞内加尔农村夫妇的一项研究。
Health Transit Rev. 1994;4 Suppl:111-24.
9
Prevalence of high-risk sex among HIV-positive gay and bisexual men: a longitudinal analysis.艾滋病毒呈阳性的男同性恋者和双性恋男性中的高危性行为流行率:一项纵向分析。
Am J Prev Med. 1996 Nov-Dec;12(6):472-7.
10
Prevalence and trends in homosexual behaviour in Norway.挪威同性恋行为的患病率及趋势。
Scand J Soc Med. 1997 Mar;25(1):33-8.

引用本文的文献

1
"You Are on the Right Track With the App:" Qualitative Analysis of Mobile Phone Use and User Feedback Regarding Mobile Phone Sexual Risk Assessments for HIV Prevention Research.“你使用这款应用的方向是正确的:”关于用于艾滋病预防研究的手机性风险评估的手机使用情况及用户反馈的定性分析
Front Digit Health. 2021 Mar 22;3:576514. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.576514. eCollection 2021.
2
Assessing the Reliability of Self-Reported Sexual Behavior Among Male Couples.评估男性伴侣间自我报告性行为的可靠性。
Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Apr;50(3):1067-1086. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01857-x. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
3
Stigma and Web-Based Sex Seeking Among Men Who Have Sex With Men and Transgender Women in Tijuana, Mexico: Cross-Sectional Study.
墨西哥蒂华纳的男男性行为者和跨性别女性中的污名化和基于网络的性寻求:横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Jan 30;6(1):e14803. doi: 10.2196/14803.
4
Sexually transmitted infections and sexual behaviors of men who have sex with men in an American Deep South PrEP clinic.美国东南部一家暴露前预防诊所中男男性行为者的性传播感染及性行为情况
Int J STD AIDS. 2020 Feb;31(2):127-135. doi: 10.1177/0956462419886228. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
5
HIV Prevention Method Preferences Within Sexual Partnerships Reported by HIV-Negative MSM and TW in Tijuana, Mexico.墨西哥蒂华纳 HIV 阴性男男性行为者和跨性别者报告的性伴侣内 HIV 预防方法偏好。
AIDS Behav. 2020 Mar;24(3):839-846. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02492-x.
6
Semen Arousal: Its Prevalence, Relationship to HIV Risk Practices, and Predictors among Men Using the Internet to Find Male Partners for Unprotected Sex.精液性唤起:其在通过互联网寻找男性无保护性行为伴侣的男性中的发生率、与HIV风险行为的关系及预测因素
J AIDS Clin Res. 2016;7(2). doi: 10.4172/2155-6113.1000546. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
7
Condom use attitudes and HIV risk among American MSM seeking partners for unprotected sex via the internet.通过互联网寻求无保护性行为伴侣的美国男男性行为者的避孕套使用态度和感染艾滋病毒风险
Int Public Health J. 2012 Oct-Dec;4(4):419-434.
8
Development and Content Validation of a Patient-Reported Sexual Risk Measure for Use in Primary Care.开发并验证一种用于初级保健的患者报告的性行为风险测量工具。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Oct;33(10):1661-1668. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4496-5. Epub 2018 May 29.
9
Mobile Phone Questionnaires for Sexual Risk Data Collection Among Young Women in Soweto, South Africa.南非索韦托地区年轻女性性行为风险数据采集的移动电话调查问卷。
AIDS Behav. 2018 Jul;22(7):2312-2321. doi: 10.1007/s10461-018-2080-y.
10
Does pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men change risk behaviour? A systematic review.男男性行为者的 HIV 预防暴露前预防是否会改变风险行为?系统评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Sep;27(17-18):3254-3265. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13990.