Suppr超能文献

体积减少和冷冻保存方法对用于移植的解冻脐带血单位质量的影响。

Influence of volume reduction and cryopreservation methodologies on quality of thawed umbilical cord blood units for transplantation.

作者信息

Solves Pilar, Mirabet Vicente, Planelles Dolores, Carbonell-Uberos Francisco, Roig Roberto

机构信息

Umbilical Cord Blood Bank, Valencia Transfusion Centre, Avda del Cid, 65-A, 46014 Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Cryobiology. 2008 Apr;56(2):152-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 Feb 13.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although there is considerable variability in methodology among umbilical cord blood banks, their common goal is to achieve optimal product quality for transplantation. Cryopreservation is a critical issue for a long-term maintenance of cord blood viability and colony-forming capacities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We designed a prospective study to compare controlled (CRF) vs. non-controlled freezing (URF) of volume-reduced cord blood units. In addition, the influence of hydroxy ethyl starch (HES) on cryopreservation was also assayed. To assess the efficiency of protocols used, cell recoveries were measured and the presence of hematopoietic colony-forming units was quantified.

RESULTS

In the study phase, we observed similar CB haematopoietc recoveries for CRF and URF strategies, except for TNC recovery that was better for HES volume reduced CB units in the URF group. When we analysed the data of routine processed CB units in samples from satellite cryovials, we found better BFU-E, CFU-GM, CFU-GEMM and CFU recoveries for those units processed with HES than without HES, in an URF manner.

CONCLUSIONS

URF of CB units is a cryopreservation procedure that allows similar hematopoietic progenitor recoveries than CRF with programmed devices. However, our study suggests that those banks that cryopreserve CB units in a URF manner should use HES for volume reduction. On the other hand, for CRF cryopreservation methodology volume reduction with and without HES are equally useful.

摘要

引言

尽管脐带血库之间的方法存在很大差异,但其共同目标是实现用于移植的最佳产品质量。冷冻保存是脐带血活力和集落形成能力长期维持的关键问题。

材料与方法

我们设计了一项前瞻性研究,以比较体积减少的脐带血单位的控制冷冻(CRF)与非控制冷冻(URF)。此外,还测定了羟乙基淀粉(HES)对冷冻保存的影响。为了评估所用方案的效率,测量了细胞回收率并对造血集落形成单位的存在进行了定量。

结果

在研究阶段,我们观察到CRF和URF策略的脐带血造血回收率相似,但URF组中HES体积减少的脐带血单位的TNC回收率更好。当我们分析来自卫星冻存管样本中常规处理的脐带血单位的数据时,我们发现以URF方式用HES处理的单位比不用HES处理的单位具有更好的BFU-E、CFU-GM、CFU-GEMM和CFU回收率。

结论

脐带血单位的URF是一种冷冻保存程序,与使用程控设备的CRF相比,其造血祖细胞回收率相似。然而,我们的研究表明,那些以URF方式冷冻保存脐带血单位的血库应使用HES进行体积减少。另一方面,对于CRF冷冻保存方法,使用和不使用HES进行体积减少同样有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验