• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年中的预期性不公正:司法系统感知不公平方面的年龄和种族/族裔差异。

Anticipatory injustice among adolescents: age and racial/ethnic differences in perceived unfairness of the justice system.

作者信息

Woolard Jennifer L, Harvell Samantha, Graham Sandra

机构信息

Georgetown University Department of Psychology, 306H White Gravenor Building, 3700 O Street NW, Washington, DC 20057, USA.

出版信息

Behav Sci Law. 2008;26(2):207-26. doi: 10.1002/bsl.805.

DOI:10.1002/bsl.805
PMID:18344171
Abstract

The present study examines age differences in anticipatory injustice, or the expectation of unfair or discriminatory treatment in the legal system. 1,393 adolescents and young adults from the community or from detention centers and jails were interviewed regarding demographic and justice system experience, intelligence, expectations about fair treatment, and legal decisions. African Americans and Latinos and those with more system experience expected greater injustice across multiple legal contexts. Anticipatory injustice increased with age among African Americans and those with the most system experience. It also predicted choices about police interrogation, attorney consultation, and plea agreements. Anticipations of injustice during adolescence may affect future interactions with court officials as well as more general constructs of legal socialization.

摘要

本研究考察了预期不公正方面的年龄差异,即对法律系统中不公平或歧视性待遇的预期。研究人员对来自社区、拘留中心和监狱的1393名青少年和青年进行了访谈,内容涉及人口统计学和司法系统经历、智力、对公平待遇的期望以及法律决策。非裔美国人和拉丁裔以及那些有更多系统经历的人预计在多种法律背景下会有更大的不公正。在非裔美国人和那些有最多系统经历的人中,预期不公正随着年龄的增长而增加。它还预测了关于警方讯问、律师咨询和认罪协议的选择。青少年时期对不公正的预期可能会影响未来与法庭官员的互动以及更一般的法律社会化结构。

相似文献

1
Anticipatory injustice among adolescents: age and racial/ethnic differences in perceived unfairness of the justice system.青少年中的预期性不公正:司法系统感知不公平方面的年龄和种族/族裔差异。
Behav Sci Law. 2008;26(2):207-26. doi: 10.1002/bsl.805.
2
Racial/Ethnic Disproportionality in Psychiatric Diagnoses and Treatment in a Sample of Serious Juvenile Offenders.严重青少年罪犯样本中精神科诊断与治疗的种族/族裔不均衡性
J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Jul;46(7):1424-1451. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0573-4. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
3
Workplace discrimination predicting racial/ethnic socialization across African American, Latino, and Chinese families.职场歧视对非裔美国人、拉丁裔和华裔家庭中种族/族裔社会化的预测作用
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2014 Oct;20(4):550-560. doi: 10.1037/a0035321. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
4
Maltreatment, family environment, and social risk factors: Determinants of the child welfare to juvenile justice transition among maltreated children and adolescents.虐待、家庭环境和社会风险因素:受虐待儿童和青少年从儿童福利到少年司法过渡的决定因素。
Child Abuse Negl. 2017 Jan;63:7-18. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.11.013. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
5
Ethnic awareness, prejudice, and civic commitments in four ethnic groups of American adolescents.美国青少年四个族群的族群意识、偏见和公民承诺。
J Youth Adolesc. 2009 Apr;38(4):500-18. doi: 10.1007/s10964-009-9394-z. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
6
Negative and positive peer influence: Relations to positive and negative behaviors for African American, European American, and Hispanic adolescents.同伴的消极和积极影响:与非裔美国、欧裔美国和西班牙裔青少年的积极和消极行为的关系。
J Adolesc. 2009 Apr;32(2):323-37. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.02.003. Epub 2008 Aug 13.
7
African American teens and the neo-juvenile justice system.非裔美国青少年与新少年司法系统。
J Health Soc Policy. 2002;15(2):69-79. doi: 10.1300/J045v15n02_07.
8
The influence of school demographic factors and perceived student discrimination on delinquency trajectory in adolescence.学校人口统计学因素和感知到的学生歧视对青少年犯罪轨迹的影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2011 Oct;49(4):407-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 May 25.
9
Examining Injustice Appraisals in a Racially Diverse Sample of Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain.在一个种族多样化的慢性下背痛患者样本中考察不公正评价。
J Pain. 2019 Jan;20(1):83-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
10
An examination of the influence of procedurally just strategies on legal cynicism among urban youth experiencing police contact.考察程序公正策略对经历警察接触的城市青年法律犬儒主义的影响。
J Community Psychol. 2020 Jan;48(1):104-123. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22242. Epub 2019 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
What's Fair in Child Welfare? Parent Knowledge, Attitudes, and Experiences.儿童福利中的公平:家长的知识、态度和经验。
Child Maltreat. 2022 Feb;27(1):53-65. doi: 10.1177/1077559520975499. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
2
Building Biased Jurors: Exposing the Circularity of the Inherent Bias Rationale for Felon-Juror Exclusion.塑造有偏见的陪审员:揭示排除重罪陪审员固有偏见理由的循环性。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2019 Dec 19;27(1):110-125. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2019.1687047. eCollection 2020.
3
Interactive Education is Associated With Lower Incidence of Pedestrian-Related Injury in Children.
互动教育与儿童行人相关伤害发生率降低有关。
J Surg Res. 2019 Dec;244:57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.015. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
4
The Impact of Waiver to Adult Court on Youths' Perceptions of Procedural Justice.豁免至成人法庭对青少年程序正义认知的影响。
Psychol Public Policy Law. 2018 Nov;24(4):418-429. doi: 10.1037/law0000181.