• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Issues in outcomes research: an overview of randomization techniques for clinical trials.结果研究中的问题:临床试验随机化技术概述
J Athl Train. 2008 Apr-Jun;43(2):215-21. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.2.215.
2
The pursuit of balance: An overview of covariate-adaptive randomization techniques in clinical trials.对平衡的追求:临床试验中协变量自适应随机化技术概述
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Nov;45(Pt A):21-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.07.011. Epub 2015 Aug 2.
3
A better alternative to stratified permuted block design for subject randomization in clinical trials.在临床试验中,用于受试者随机分组的分层随机区组设计的一种更好替代方法。
Stat Med. 2014 Dec 30;33(30):5239-48. doi: 10.1002/sim.6266. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
4
Comparison of Pocock and Simon's covariate-adaptive randomization procedures in clinical trials.临床试验中 Pocock 和 Simon 的协变量适应性随机化程序比较
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Jan 25;24(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02151-3.
5
Randomization in substance abuse clinical trials.药物滥用临床试验中的随机化
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2006 Feb 6;1:6. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-1-6.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Simulation of various randomization strategies for a clinical trial in sickle cell disease.镰状细胞病临床试验中各种随机化策略的模拟。
Hematology. 2016 May;21(4):241-7. doi: 10.1080/10245332.2015.1101966. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
8
Properties of simple randomization in clinical trials.临床试验中简单随机化的性质。
Control Clin Trials. 1988 Dec;9(4):312-26. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(88)90046-3.
9
The impact of misclassification on covariate-adaptive randomized clinical trials.混杂因素自适应随机临床试验中分类错误的影响。
Biometrics. 2021 Jun;77(2):451-464. doi: 10.1111/biom.13308. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
10
Stratified randomization for platform trials with differing experimental arm eligibility.分层随机化用于具有不同实验组合格条件的平台试验。
Clin Trials. 2021 Oct;18(5):562-569. doi: 10.1177/17407745211028872. Epub 2021 Aug 21.

引用本文的文献

1
One-on-one and group-based physical activity intervention compared to a waitlist control for post-secondary student mental health and social well-being: A 3-arm parallel randomized controlled trial protocol.与等待名单对照组相比,一对一和基于小组的体育活动干预对大专学生心理健康和社会幸福感的影响:一项三臂平行随机对照试验方案。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 29;20(8):e0330851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330851. eCollection 2025.
2
Post-activation performance enhancement in resisted sprinting: effects of different loads and rest intervals on 100-m sprint segments.抗阻冲刺中激活后运动表现增强:不同负荷和休息间隔对100米冲刺分段的影响
Front Physiol. 2025 Aug 12;16:1544291. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1544291. eCollection 2025.
3
Peripheral Parenteral Nutrition and Personalized Nutritional Approach After Colorectal Resection Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Current Evidence.结直肠切除术后的外周肠外营养与个性化营养方法:当前证据的全面综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Aug 14;61(8):1459. doi: 10.3390/medicina61081459.
4
Evaluating the Cultural Adaptation of Evidence-Based HIV Prevention Interventions for African Immigrant Women: Exploratory Pilot Mixed-Methods Study.评估针对非洲移民妇女的循证艾滋病毒预防干预措施的文化适应性:探索性试点混合方法研究。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1007/s10903-025-01762-2.
5
Evaluating the feasibility of study methods for a future trial-based economic evaluation of a multistage shared decision-making program for type 2 diabetes mellitus: Protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled pilot study.评估未来一项针对2型糖尿病多阶段共享决策项目基于试验的经济评估研究方法的可行性:一项整群随机对照试验性研究方案
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 5;20(8):e0300944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300944. eCollection 2025.
6
Rigorous methodological approaches to address knowledge gaps in exercise, nutrition, immunity, and infection risk research.严谨的方法论方法,以填补运动、营养、免疫和感染风险研究中的知识空白。
Physiol Rep. 2025 Jul;13(14):e70479. doi: 10.14814/phy2.70479.
7
The impact of randomization techniques on the performance of pre-post design models.随机化技术对前后设计模型性能的影响。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Jul 19;25(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02632-z.
8
Evaluating the Effects of Yoga on the Body Mass Index and Heart Rate among Individuals with Substance Use Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial.评估瑜伽对物质使用障碍个体体重指数和心率的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2025 Jul 12. doi: 10.1007/s10484-025-09727-9.
9
Impact of almond milk fortified with vitamin D3-loaded soy protein nanoparticles on serum 25(OH)D3 concentrations in adults with CKD: a pilot double-blind randomized controlled trial.添加负载维生素D3的大豆蛋白纳米颗粒的杏仁奶对慢性肾脏病成年患者血清25(OH)D3浓度的影响:一项双盲随机对照试验的初步研究
J Nephrol. 2025 Jul 12. doi: 10.1007/s40620-025-02353-y.
10
Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in liver biopsy.超声造影在肝活检中的应用。
Pol J Radiol. 2025 Jun 6;90:e292-e298. doi: 10.5114/pjr/203333. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomization in substance abuse clinical trials.药物滥用临床试验中的随机化
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2006 Feb 6;1:6. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-1-6.
2
It's time for evidence.是时候拿出证据了。
J Athl Train. 2006 Jan-Mar;41(1):7.
3
Gold is not always good enough: the shortcomings of randomization when evaluating interventions in small heterogeneous samples.黄金并非总是足够好:评估小的异质性样本中的干预措施时随机化的缺点。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Dec;57(12):1219-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.06.003.
4
Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trial.急性中风临床试验中治疗分配的分层与适应性方法比较
Stat Med. 2003 Mar 15;22(5):705-26. doi: 10.1002/sim.1366.
5
The method of minimization for allocation to clinical trials. a review.分配至临床试验的最小化方法。综述
Control Clin Trials. 2002 Dec;23(6):662-74. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(02)00242-8.
6
Allocation concealment in randomised trials: defending against deciphering.随机试验中的分配隐藏:防范被破解。
Lancet. 2002 Feb 16;359(9306):614-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07750-4.
7
Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials: chance, not choice.随机试验中分配序列的产生:靠的是机遇,而非选择。
Lancet. 2002 Feb 9;359(9305):515-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07683-3.
8
Is the randomized clinical trial the gold standard of research?
J Androl. 2001 Nov-Dec;22(6):938-43. doi: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2001.tb03433.x.
9
How to randomise.如何进行随机化。
BMJ. 1999 Sep 11;319(7211):703-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7211.703.
10
Statistics notes. Treatment allocation in controlled trials: why randomise?统计学笔记。对照试验中的治疗分配:为何要随机化?
BMJ. 1999 May 1;318(7192):1209. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7192.1209.

结果研究中的问题:临床试验随机化技术概述

Issues in outcomes research: an overview of randomization techniques for clinical trials.

作者信息

Kang Minsoo, Ragan Brian G, Park Jae-Hyeon

机构信息

Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN, USA.

出版信息

J Athl Train. 2008 Apr-Jun;43(2):215-21. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.2.215.

DOI:10.4085/1062-6050-43.2.215
PMID:18345348
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2267325/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review and describe randomization techniques used in clinical trials, including simple, block, stratified, and covariate adaptive techniques.

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials are required to establish treatment efficacy of many athletic training procedures. In the past, we have relied on evidence of questionable scientific merit to aid the determination of treatment choices. Interest in evidence-based practice is growing rapidly within the athletic training profession, placing greater emphasis on the importance of well-conducted clinical trials. One critical component of clinical trials that strengthens results is random assignment of participants to control and treatment groups. Although randomization appears to be a simple concept, issues of balancing sample sizes and controlling the influence of covariates a priori are important. Various techniques have been developed to account for these issues, including block, stratified randomization, and covariate adaptive techniques.

ADVANTAGES

Athletic training researchers and scholarly clinicians can use the information presented in this article to better conduct and interpret the results of clinical trials. Implementing these techniques will increase the power and validity of findings of athletic medicine clinical trials, which will ultimately improve the quality of care provided.

摘要

目的

回顾并描述临床试验中使用的随机化技术,包括简单随机化、区组随机化、分层随机化和协变量适应性技术。

背景

需要通过临床试验来确定许多运动训练方法的治疗效果。过去,我们依赖科学价值存疑的证据来辅助治疗选择的判定。在运动训练行业,基于证据的实践的关注度正在迅速增长,这更加凸显了开展良好的临床试验的重要性。临床试验中强化结果的一个关键要素是将参与者随机分配到对照组和治疗组。尽管随机化看似是个简单的概念,但事先平衡样本量和控制协变量的影响等问题很重要。为解决这些问题已开发出各种技术,包括区组随机化、分层随机化和协变量适应性技术。

优势

运动训练研究人员和学术临床医生可以利用本文提供的信息更好地开展和解释临床试验结果。应用这些技术将提高运动医学临床试验结果的效力和有效性,最终改善所提供的护理质量。