Ma Jun, Stafford Randall S
Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, 795 El Camino Real, Stanford, CA 94301, USA.
Hypertension. 2008 May;51(5):1275-81. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.107086. Epub 2008 Mar 17.
Essential hypertension is the most common diagnosis in US primary care settings for middle-aged persons and seniors. Yet, data on hypertension screening, treatment, and control in such settings are limited. We analyzed National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data to examine the rates of and factors associated with hypertension screening, treatment, and control during US office visits in 2003 and 2004. Blood pressure was measured in 56% (95% confidence limits: 52% to 59%) of all visits by patients > or =18 years of age and in 93% (95% confidence limits: 89% to 96%) of hypertensive patient visits. Among the latter, 62% (95% confidence limits: 55% to 69%) were treated. Diuretics were the most commonly prescribed antihypertensive agents (46%; 95% confidence limits: 41% to 50%), and combination therapy was reported in 58% (95% confidence limits: 54% to 63%) of treated visits. Only 39% (95% confidence limits: 34% to 43%) of treated visits were at recommended blood pressure goals. The odds of not being screened for hypertension were notably greater for visits with a provider other than a primary care physician or cardiologist (10.0; 95% confidence limits: 5.5 to 16.7) and for nonwell care visits (5.6; 95% confidence limits: 3.6 to 8.3). Greater odds of not being treated for hypertension were noted by geographic region (South versus Northeast: 2.6; 95% confidence limits: 1.2 to 5.6) and visit type (first time versus return visits; 1.6; 95% confidence limits: 1.1 to 2.4). The odds of not having blood pressure controlled were greater for patients with comorbidities (1.6; 95% confidence limits: 1.1 to 2.4). In conclusion, more intervention efforts are needed to further reduce the gaps and variations in routine practice in relation to evidence-based practice guidelines for hypertension screening, treatment, and control.
原发性高血压是美国初级保健机构中中年人和老年人最常见的诊断疾病。然而,这些机构中有关高血压筛查、治疗和控制的数据有限。我们分析了全国门诊医疗调查数据,以研究2003年和2004年美国门诊就诊期间高血压筛查、治疗和控制的比率及相关因素。在所有18岁及以上患者就诊中,56%(95%置信区间:52%至59%)测量了血压,在高血压患者就诊中,93%(95%置信区间:89%至96%)测量了血压。在后者中,62%(95%置信区间:55%至69%)接受了治疗。利尿剂是最常用的降压药物(46%;95%置信区间:41%至50%),在58%(95%置信区间:54%至63%)的治疗就诊中报告了联合治疗。仅39%(95%置信区间:34%至43%)的治疗就诊达到了推荐的血压目标。由非初级保健医生或心脏病专家提供服务的就诊(比值比为10.0;95%置信区间:5.5至16.7)以及非健康护理就诊(比值比为5.6;95%置信区间:3.6至8.3)未进行高血压筛查的几率显著更高。按地理区域(南部与东北部相比:2.6;95%置信区间:1.2至5.6)和就诊类型(首次就诊与复诊;1.6;95%置信区间:1.1至2.4)来看,未接受高血压治疗的几率更高。患有合并症的患者血压未得到控制的几率更大(1.6;95%置信区间:1.1至2.4)。总之,需要更多的干预措施来进一步缩小与高血压筛查、治疗和控制的循证实践指南相关的常规实践中的差距和差异。